|
|
Post by sincityhero on Jun 19, 2008 19:51:16 GMT -5
I was just wondering about this, Before I would never really pay this close attention to his size but damn the guy is tiny lol I meen SERIOUSLY small, He is a great wrestler and has been for a while but im wondering if he can technically be called a midget? I meen his whole body is sooo tiny, his arms, legs etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by iyfwkidzc on Jun 19, 2008 19:55:53 GMT -5
Oh my  ing god... no Aries isn't a midget. |
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on Jun 19, 2008 19:56:02 GMT -5
He's only 5'9". It's not like he is 5 foot.
|
|
|
|
Post by sincityhero on Jun 19, 2008 21:32:19 GMT -5
Oh my ing god... no Aries isn't a midget. Have you taken your meds today? |
|
|
|
Post by lariato on Jun 19, 2008 22:00:45 GMT -5
5'9"?! Holy crapon a stick.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Jun 19, 2008 22:06:47 GMT -5
He's only 5'9". It's not like he is 5 foot. That means he is taller than Sydal |
|
|
|
Post by sincityhero on Jun 19, 2008 22:13:15 GMT -5
But sydal's body looks normal lol Idk man aries body just looks reaaal tiny.
|
|
Blehschmidt
Main Eventer
Regal > You
Joined on: Mar 25, 2007 10:50:50 GMT -5
Posts: 1,171
|
Post by Blehschmidt on Jun 19, 2008 22:54:00 GMT -5
Look at old footage of Jimmy Jacobs, or Colin Delaney, or Jack Evans.
Just because Aries isn't huge, doesn't make him a midget.
|
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Jun 19, 2008 22:55:44 GMT -5
I would say that Aries really has no future in WWE any time soon but hey.. he's still got a great body for Japan and ROH.
|
|
|
|
Post by NOW that's WRESTLING on Jun 20, 2008 5:03:03 GMT -5
If you think his body looks tiny now, imagine what it was like before the steroids...  |
|
|
|
Post by perilloboy123 on Jun 20, 2008 8:57:45 GMT -5
Aries looks fine. I just saw him wrestle Danielson at Take No Prisoners. Seriously, I don't know what you're talking about, man.
|
|
|
|
Post by sincityhero on Jun 20, 2008 17:36:13 GMT -5
If you think his body looks tiny now, imagine what it was like before the steroids... lol he did look bigger in tna |
|
|
|
Post by Doomrider on Jun 20, 2008 20:18:39 GMT -5
I think under 4'10" is technically being a midget, so no.
|
|
|
|
Post by AndyPeck13 on Jun 20, 2008 20:32:15 GMT -5
I think under 4'10" is technically being a midget, so no. this man is correct....to be considered a midget i believe you have to be under either 4'9,'10 or '11....so no he's not...and they do not classify midgets based on the size of the persons arms, torso or whatever...only their height |
|
|
|
Post by pimpmaster5000 on Jun 20, 2008 22:08:23 GMT -5
are you intellectually- disabled? seriously what the #$%^
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Jun 20, 2008 22:22:50 GMT -5
At 5-9, he is taller than me...
To be legally considered a midget, don't you have to be like 4-6 or something?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 26, 2024 22:49:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2008 22:32:56 GMT -5
At 5-9, he is taller than me... To be legally considered a midget, don't you have to be like 4-6 or something? Like it's been stated, the legal height of a midget is 4'10" |
|
|
|
Post by Cass on Jun 20, 2008 22:35:34 GMT -5
Didn't WWE originally hire Mikey Batts to compete in the Junior Division?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 26, 2024 22:49:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2008 22:39:16 GMT -5
Didn't WWE originally hire Mikey Batts to compete in the Junior Division? Yeah, but WWE is all on crack, so.... |
|
|
|
Post by pimpmaster5000 on Jun 21, 2008 4:02:42 GMT -5
Didn't WWE originally hire Mikey Batts to compete in the Junior Division? Yeah, but WWE is all on crack, so.... dylan postal is 5 foot 3 isnt he so hes just short and hes considered a midgit |
|
