Deleted
Joined on: Nov 26, 2024 9:49:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2008 22:22:16 GMT -5
*Waits for the next Kurt Angle interview where he'll proceed to say "yeah, so we're beating RAW in the ratings" once again*  |
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Jun 21, 2008 22:58:43 GMT -5
*Waits for the next Kurt Angle interview where he'll proceed to say "yeah, so we're beating RAW in the ratings" once again* He was right, you know. Have you seen Raw's Thursday night ratings? Practically nonexistent. |
|
"Jefe"
Superstar
you go get that beautiful pig
Joined on: Apr 16, 2008 20:15:53 GMT -5
Posts: 534
|
Post by "Jefe" on Jun 22, 2008 18:38:10 GMT -5
Rounded up and down they're the same so it makes no difference.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mac on Jun 23, 2008 4:49:29 GMT -5
great news for TNA and me as a Fan
|
|
|
|
Post by punkforchampion on Jun 24, 2008 18:59:35 GMT -5
congrats tna on beating the f brand that now boosts you up from an f to a d-
|
|
|
|
Post by †hê Jå§ðñ Wïllïåm§ on Jun 24, 2008 19:16:14 GMT -5
^ Shut up...
Only thing I was thinking when i read this was a 2 hour show beat a 1 hour show, big deal.
|
|
LYIAM
Main Eventer
Vikings 10-6-0
Joined on: Mar 2, 2004 15:54:05 GMT -5
Posts: 2,772
|
Post by LYIAM on Jun 27, 2008 8:42:55 GMT -5
TNA should be getting higher than a 1.03
|
|
|
|
Post by Gene on Jun 27, 2008 20:46:25 GMT -5
I am not a TNA hater, but look at the truth. TNA beating ECW is not a big thing. If TNA started going towards a 2. rating then it's a big thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by cstoney16 on Jun 27, 2008 20:56:19 GMT -5
Wow, we've got a bunch of TNA haters in here. Honestly, it could mean a shot in the arm for TNA. Most of you are failing to realize that TNA is still in the growing stage. Sure they've been around for a little while now, but they've been on SpikeTV for what, a year now? Before that what channel were they on? Oh thats right, it was weekly pay-per-view shows. Now, how long has WWE been on TV? It's no comparison. WWE is an established entity that has been on tv for a long time now. TNA is in the learning stage of whats working and what isn't. You can't expect them to come in and immediately contend with WWE in the rating.
Give it a little time and TNA will have their rating steadily increase.
|
|
|
|
Post by ICW on Jun 27, 2008 21:33:00 GMT -5
How is barely beating WWE's C show a 'shot in the arm for TNA'?
I could imagine how thrilled they must be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Jun 27, 2008 22:45:40 GMT -5
Wow, we've got a bunch of TNA haters in here. Honestly, it could mean a shot in the arm for TNA. Most of you are failing to realize that TNA is still in the growing stage. Sure they've been around for a little while now, but they've been on SpikeTV for what, a year now? Before that what channel were they on? Oh thats right, it was weekly pay-per-view shows. Now, how long has WWE been on TV? It's no comparison. WWE is an established entity that has been on tv for a long time now. TNA is in the learning stage of whats working and what isn't. You can't expect them to come in and immediately contend with WWE in the rating. Give it a little time and TNA will have their rating steadily increase. Uh, October 2005? But that's not enough for more than a 1.0? |
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Jun 28, 2008 14:13:11 GMT -5
0.9 this past week
ECW beat them
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Jun 28, 2008 17:53:57 GMT -5
Wow, we've got a bunch of TNA haters in here. Honestly, it could mean a shot in the arm for TNA. Most of you are failing to realize that TNA is still in the growing stage. Sure they've been around for a little while now, but they've been on SpikeTV for what, a year now? Before that what channel were they on? Oh thats right, it was weekly pay-per-view shows. Now, how long has WWE been on TV? It's no comparison. WWE is an established entity that has been on tv for a long time now. TNA is in the learning stage of whats working and what isn't. You can't expect them to come in and immediately contend with WWE in the rating. Give it a little time and TNA will have their rating steadily increase. Uh... First, they debuted on Spike in October 2005 - so not "a" year but going on three years. Second, before SpikeTV they was on Fox Sports Net on Fridays at 3PM PLUS their weekly pay-per-views. Then they lost FSN and started airing iMPACT on their website and had monthly PPVs. |
|
|
|
Post by ajstyles888 on Jun 29, 2008 10:15:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by iwgp on Jul 1, 2008 11:45:35 GMT -5
|
|
