Deleted
Joined on: Oct 31, 2024 20:01:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2008 22:13:30 GMT -5
KATIE & KANE'S ILLIGITAMATE CHILD LIVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THEY WERE JUST IMMATURE TEENS HAVING FUN BEFORE KANE'S FACE WAS BURNED IN THE FIRE AND BEFORE KATIE'S TRAGIC DEMISE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
B.D. & El G.
Main Eventer
RIP SNS 2/15/82 - 4/11/11
Joined on: Jan 2, 2008 17:52:29 GMT -5
Posts: 4,113
|
Post by B.D. & El G. on Jul 7, 2008 22:15:33 GMT -5
Vince, come to think of it, that could be why they're not commenting on his condition.
|
|
|
|
Post by The-Rock on Jul 7, 2008 22:20:25 GMT -5
my thought process while I was watching
1. Paul Bearer
2. Undertaker (he needs to come to Raw, raw is boring as hell)
3. His gimmick
4. Tim White
5. Vince Mcmahon
6. 3rd brother
7. illegitimate son
i am so sick of Kane, its the Same old **** with him every time he wrestles and appears on raw. then they always find a way to screw it up. This is why I was so pissed to see him come to raw. atleast he turned heel, because he is lame as hell as a face.
Doesn't Paul Bearer have a son who is getting into wrestling or something? Seems unlikely that they would bring him back since he is happy in his current life running a funeral home, and now he is really skinny and doesn't look the same.
|
|
|
|
Post by thestartofnewera on Jul 7, 2008 22:22:53 GMT -5
I def have to say KANE was referring to Vince McMahon when KANE said is he dead or alive. Then again this could be a way for Taker to make his comeback on RAW. Taker on RAW would be awesome be Taker feuding would suck big time. I would not mind seeing KANE and Vince McMahon feud a while.
|
|
|
|
Post by justamazing on Jul 7, 2008 22:23:25 GMT -5
KATIE & KANE'S ILLIGITAMATE CHILD LIVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THEY WERE JUST IMMATURE TEENS HAVING FUN BEFORE KANE'S FACE WAS BURNED IN THE FIRE AND BEFORE KATIE'S TRAGIC DEMISE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Umm, didn't he rape her while she was dead? How is it possible for a baby to pop out of a dead woman's womb?  |
|
Loose Cannon
Main Eventer
R.I.P
Joined on: May 16, 2005 21:56:29 GMT -5
Posts: 2,836
|
Post by Loose Cannon on Jul 7, 2008 22:28:06 GMT -5
kane was talking about himself...hes going heel...now hes all sympathetic about vince...COME ON PEOPLE...and SD has barely anyone..Taker will be returning to SD....
|
|
|
|
Post by TeamExtreme718x on Jul 7, 2008 22:30:33 GMT -5
A 3rd brother would be amazing..But i seriously doubt it..
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 31, 2024 20:01:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2008 22:32:32 GMT -5
Maybe Kane is refering to his own self. His old character... is it coming back? Or will remain dead? That's the first thing I thought. I don't think it's 'Taker, as 'Taker was "banished", it's not like he disappeared of was in an accident or whatever. Vince, meh, doubt that aswell. I say he's referring to himself. |
|
|
|
Post by Angel Beast on Jul 7, 2008 22:33:25 GMT -5
KATIE & KANE'S ILLIGITAMATE CHILD LIVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THEY WERE JUST IMMATURE TEENS HAVING FUN BEFORE KANE'S FACE WAS BURNED IN THE FIRE AND BEFORE KATIE'S TRAGIC DEMISE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! they never had a kid. and kane was burned when he was a child |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 31, 2024 20:01:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2008 22:34:19 GMT -5
If it's McMahon, it better make sense... which knowing the WWE writers, it won't. If it's The Undertaker, boo to that. We've seen Taker vs. Kane more times than I can count. But still, if done differently... it could be awesome. A third brother storyline, like McMahon, could be good... but probably won't.
So, i'm personally pulling for it to be The Undertaker. As long as Kane can be booked seriously again, i'll be happy. Plus, the mask wouldn't be a bad bonus... WWE, i've been good this year. Just that one gift will do.
- Triple S
|
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Jul 7, 2008 22:35:50 GMT -5
The Return of Al Wilson?
|
|
|
|
Post by Angel Beast on Jul 7, 2008 22:36:49 GMT -5
i wonder if he's referring to Paul Bearer. even though it was four years ago.
|
|
|
|
Post by American Phenom on Jul 7, 2008 22:41:45 GMT -5
I think he's referring to himself: Kane, the monster.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jul 7, 2008 22:43:24 GMT -5
I'd say yes, if they hadn't just fired Torrie. |
|
|
|
Post by Ace Bennett on Jul 7, 2008 22:45:21 GMT -5
i think hes talking about somebody who we don't know
|
|
|
|
Post by Gussy on Jul 7, 2008 22:47:24 GMT -5
It is probably Vince! He will probbaly say it was him who tried to kill Vince.
|
|
|
|
Post by Barrett on Jul 7, 2008 22:50:16 GMT -5
My first thought was Paul Bearer, and until the storyline is furthered he's my top guess.
|
|
|
|
Post by American Phenom on Jul 7, 2008 22:51:51 GMT -5
Maybe Kane is a huge Dark Knight fan, and is talking about Heath Ledger?
Either that, or Eddie Murphy's career?
|
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Jul 7, 2008 22:56:52 GMT -5
I'd say yes, if they hadn't just fired Torrie. I'd be up for it, if it meant the return of Dawn Marie. |
|
|
|
Post by jomoishollywood on Jul 7, 2008 22:57:33 GMT -5
That heel turn was godly. Wow. I'd love to see where this leads to.. Thats pretty much what I was just about to say. I just hope they dont screw up on this. Edit: Its the Undertaker. Why would he be talking about Vince McMahon? Its unlikely he tried killing Vince, I dont see a reason why he would. |
|
