Revelation O'Deeves
Superstar
The Man Called Sting...
Joined on: Jan 21, 2007 20:53:50 GMT -5
Posts: 943
|
Post by Revelation O'Deeves on Jul 8, 2008 16:07:54 GMT -5
we all know the attitude era was great but we need to stop talking about it and move on haha. why? is there some rule that says the attitude era isnt open for discussion anymore? Nope guess the Additude era is the next Chris Benoit *looks around* Who is he again =D listin I love Benoit and i love the additude era and i will never stop talking about them! |
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Jul 8, 2008 16:13:35 GMT -5
Not that Attitude Era discussion isn't allowed...but further discussion may result in moving this thread to the Classic board.
|
|
|
|
Post by 49% Motherf**ker, 51% SOB on Jul 8, 2008 16:23:57 GMT -5
Do you think if the name change never took place that the Additude Era would still be around? Or even if it ended do you think if it was still/or if they could go back to being the WWF we would have a much better product? I know some of you will probly say how would a name afect the overall product, but some of you may know that a name is very vitail to a brand/product. I think now that we are the WWE there alot more soap opraish story lines example being edge and vickys wedding (not say there wasnt soap opraish story lins in the F) but we can honistly say we had alot more talented wrestling durring the World WRESTLING Federation. so anyone eles think this? Too much time on your hands!!!! |
|
Revelation O'Deeves
Superstar
The Man Called Sting...
Joined on: Jan 21, 2007 20:53:50 GMT -5
Posts: 943
|
Post by Revelation O'Deeves on Jul 8, 2008 16:36:18 GMT -5
Do you think if the name change never took place that the Additude Era would still be around? Or even if it ended do you think if it was still/or if they could go back to being the WWF we would have a much better product? I know some of you will probly say how would a name afect the overall product, but some of you may know that a name is very vitail to a brand/product. I think now that we are the WWE there alot more soap opraish story lines example being edge and vickys wedding (not say there wasnt soap opraish story lins in the F) but we can honistly say we had alot more talented wrestling durring the World WRESTLING Federation. so anyone eles think this? Too much time on your hands!!!! No actully i dont have much time on my hands at all thank you every much but i am just an intulecual person who is a big wrestling fan and doesnt only look at the entertainment perpose of it but also the business behind it and how things are ran you on the other hand sir have way to much time on your hands if u look at every thread in order just to bash it. I think i rest my case |
|
|
|
Post by ztj_wwf on Jul 8, 2008 17:43:50 GMT -5
Well thats b.c you never got to experiance the RAW (no pun intended)ness of the WWF No. I've watch a few episode's of Raw from the 90's. I just prefer WWE. How? |
|
|
|
Post by Keyboard Cat on Jul 8, 2008 17:47:41 GMT -5
No. I've watch a few episode's of Raw from the 90's. I just prefer WWE. How? WWE on demand, old PPV, And Video's/DVD's. but if you mean WHY do I prefer WWE over WWF. That is because I started watching wrestling AFTER the name change. |
|
|
|
Post by Chicago on Jul 8, 2008 18:02:35 GMT -5
WWE on demand, old PPV, And Video's/DVD's. but if you mean WHY do I prefer WWE over WWF. That is because I started watching wrestling AFTER the name change. Watching the WWF on tape now is not the same thing as actually experiencing it as it was happening. The Attitude era was incredible and, not to attack you personally or anything, but if you weren't around to experience it, than you will never know why so many people feel so nostalgic about it. |
|
|
|
Post by cooliceman63 on Jul 8, 2008 19:00:07 GMT -5
ive seen both and i think they both have advantages and disadvantages. WWF had better writers and storylines while WWE has much better performers, Id take Cena over Austin any day
|
|
Get A Rhythm™
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 25, 2007 4:17:23 GMT -5
Posts: 2,120
|
Post by Get A Rhythm™ on Jul 8, 2008 19:14:46 GMT -5
No. The name change didn't change the product. It's always been entertainment.
|
|
|
|
Post by Barrett on Jul 8, 2008 19:20:53 GMT -5
The Attitude Era had been over for at least a year before the name changed.
|
|
scoobypat
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 22, 2006 18:39:00 GMT -5
Posts: 2,442
|
Post by scoobypat on Jul 8, 2008 19:53:47 GMT -5
The Attitude Era died before the name change. As far as I'm concerned the Attitude Era died the night after Wresltemania 17, that night the Rock began his filming career and took his first long hiatus, the WCW/ECW storyline began to develop, SCSA and McMahon were working together and stars from WCW began showing up. Basically the brand began to lose it's identity.
|
|
|
|
Post by TeamExtreme718x on Jul 8, 2008 20:48:06 GMT -5
Dont blame the name for the quality of WWE..The fact is..Were just older now..And that makes everything different..
|
|
|
|
Post by BrIaNMeRcY on Jul 8, 2008 21:05:35 GMT -5
Get the "F' out! Since I started watching in early 2004 I kinda like the WWE name more. WWE sounds like crap compared to WWF. |
|
sig credit to Focalin
