|
Post by Byron F'N Saxton Fan on Jan 2, 2008 22:03:17 GMT -5
TNA has been around since 2002 and right now there on Spike averging a 1.1 rating, on a 2 hour slot. Do you think this is a make or break year for TNA?
|
|
|
Post by Iron Man on Jan 2, 2008 22:30:00 GMT -5
It will be the same imo. Nothing will really change...
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Jan 2, 2008 23:26:41 GMT -5
I would honestly say if any year decided the fate of TNA, it's this year. I think they need to heavily rely on their video game and using that to gain fans. The thing TNA doesn't do that would help them, is really listen to their fans, hire some guy to go on message boards to see what people say. They seem to have taken the Vince McMahon "we're too big to care" stance. That doesn't work when I guarantee that 1.1 million each week is primarily internet fans. TNA tries to grow and seems to think that they are, when your booking blows, you can't. To me if TNA doesn't pick it self up by the time their game is out, they may as well enjoy their final time. The game will get people to watch, but when they see it sucks and they get more action from the game than the show it's named after, TNA will lose. So yeah, I would honestly say 2008 will be their make or break year. They can either say the fans and keep doing what they're doing, or listen to who can really help them. People will say internet fans don't know, we kinda do. Sure we're the most unsatisfied group when it comes to champions or whatever, but if you take certain parts out and just listen to what we say about the awful angles where briefcases make number one contenders only to ignore that come January, we can help. It's not rocket science, it's pro wrestling.
|
|
|
Post by Ultimate Figure Collector on Jan 2, 2008 23:58:16 GMT -5
It will be the same imo. Nothing will really change... Agreed. TNA in 2008 will be the same TNA we are seeing now. Just with more WWE rejects..
|
|
|
Post by Johnny on Jan 3, 2008 1:05:36 GMT -5
I don't want TNA to get big. It's good as it is now. WWE got bigger and look what happened to them.
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Jan 3, 2008 1:30:26 GMT -5
Haven't they had 5 and a half "make or break" years already?
|
|
Too Sweet
Main Eventer
R.I.P MJ
Joined on: Sept 20, 2006 23:28:07 GMT -5
Posts: 3,611
|
Post by Too Sweet on Jan 3, 2008 8:16:03 GMT -5
I really think 2007 was more of a growing year for them, they got 2 Hours, They did more PPV's outside of the Impact Zone and they toured alot more than ever before.
If TNA doesn't step their game up with year they're doomed, Im hoping they'll do an Impact outside the Impact Zone.
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jan 3, 2008 9:20:49 GMT -5
they need to get it togetger
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Jan 3, 2008 9:43:05 GMT -5
I don't want TNA to get big. It's good as it is now. WWE got bigger and look what happened to them. ...they elevated the industry to a national level, defeated their three biggest rivals, acquired a metric load of classic footage in the process, and became the single most successful wrestling company of all time, to the point that they still make millions of dollars a year despite putting out a subpar product? Dear lord, you're right, TNA doesn't want that at all.
|
|
|
Post by htmlegend on Jan 3, 2008 23:32:01 GMT -5
I think if they continue to get a 1.1 throughout 2008, there won't be much of a 2009 for them. And i agree with Seanzor, they have taken the Vince McMahon philosoohy of "screw the fans, we're too big to listen to them".
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 25, 2024 6:49:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2008 2:57:52 GMT -5
Just get their booking straight, and people other than the IWC, will watch. Case in point, despite being innovative in some parts, fire Vince Russo, and get someone who knows what the fans want. JArrett, Cornette, HEyman = Booking HEaven. Just don't let Heyman anywhere NEAR that budget. Remember what happened last time he had control of a budget.
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Jan 6, 2008 10:28:37 GMT -5
Just get their booking straight, and people other than the IWC, will watch. Case in point, despite being innovative in some parts, fire Vince Russo, and get someone who knows what the fans want. JArrett, Cornette, HEyman = Booking HEaven. Just don't let Heyman anywhere NEAR that budget. Remember what happened last time he had control of a budget. I'd put Lance Storm somewhere on that booking committee. Not necessarily as a booker, but moreso as a filter.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 25, 2024 6:49:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2008 11:17:24 GMT -5
Im hoping for a change. I think they should fire Russo actually have good storylines. But nothing will change this year.
|
|
|
Post by bowlofpetunias on Jan 6, 2008 12:05:03 GMT -5
Just get their booking straight, and people other than the IWC, will watch. Case in point, despite being innovative in some parts, fire Vince Russo, and get someone who knows what the fans want. JArrett, Cornette, HEyman = Booking HEaven. Just don't let Heyman anywhere NEAR that budget. Remember what happened last time he had control of a budget. I'd put Lance Storm somewhere on that booking committee. Not necessarily as a booker, but moreso as a filter. queue eff tee
|
|
|
Post by perilloboy123 on Jan 6, 2008 14:19:07 GMT -5
They have to get rid of Russo if they want anything good to happen.
|
|
|
Post by Iron Man on Jan 6, 2008 14:20:53 GMT -5
They have to get rid of Russo if they want anything good to happen. You mean Jarrett and Dutch Mantell.
|
|
|
Post by Ian from 616Entertainment. on Jan 6, 2008 14:38:05 GMT -5
Just get their booking straight, and people other than the IWC, will watch. Case in point, despite being innovative in some parts, fire Vince Russo, and get someone who knows what the fans want. JArrett, Cornette, HEyman = Booking HEaven. Just don't let Heyman anywhere NEAR that budget. Remember what happened last time he had control of a budget. I'd put Lance Storm somewhere on that booking committee. Not necessarily as a booker, but moreso as a filter. Lance Storm may have his share of ideas after seeing the show every week, but how do we know that he could churn out the ideas every time he shows up for work? To me, Storm is a critic. Critics don't do the work, they bitch about it. I'm not saying you're wrong, and I'm not saying Storm sucks. What I'm saying is that you can't judge his creativity and long term helpfulness based on the fact that after the show is over and done with, Lance has his own say. Half of us on this board could come up with better ideas than TNA is currently using, for god's sake.
|
|
|
Post by perilloboy123 on Jan 6, 2008 16:10:59 GMT -5
They have to get rid of Russo if they want anything good to happen. You mean Jarrett and Dutch Mantell. No, I mean Russo, but I wouldn't mind seeing them go, as well.
|
|
|
Post by Iron Man on Jan 6, 2008 16:33:50 GMT -5
You mean Jarrett and Dutch Mantell. No, I mean Russo, but I wouldn't mind seeing them go, as well. Russo has very little to do with anything in TNA. The stuff he has done is bad but not nearly as bad as Dutch and Jeff.
|
|
|
Post by bowlofpetunias on Jan 6, 2008 18:56:51 GMT -5
I'd put Lance Storm somewhere on that booking committee. Not necessarily as a booker, but moreso as a filter.Lance Storm may have his share of ideas after seeing the show every week, but how do we know that he could churn out the ideas every time he shows up for work? To me, Storm is a critic. Critics don't do the work, they bitch about it. I'm not saying you're wrong, and I'm not saying Storm sucks. What I'm saying is that you can't judge his creativity and long term helpfulness based on the fact that after the show is over and done with, Lance has his own say. Half of us on this board could come up with better ideas than TNA is currently using, for god's sake. I'm sure you feel like you just made a sound post without a reasonable rebuttal, but just wait, because he never claimed that Lance Storm should be a booker or a writer or anything of that nature. In bold, I have highlighted the comment in question. He believes that Lance would have a great position as adviser to the booking committee. I, for one, agree, as should anyone has read his blogs about TNA. In these blogs, Storm has shown a great mind for the business and that's really what Total Non-Stop Action needs.
|
|