lonedog
Superstar
Joined on: May 26, 2004 11:15:47 GMT -5
Posts: 534
|
Post by lonedog on Jul 20, 2008 11:37:09 GMT -5
The term Pound for Pound we hear everywhere is crap.I'm sick of hearing it,especially from Dana's mouth.We hear it in boxing and now in MMA.
How do you measure P4P? Is there a formula?
Each weight class has it's best fighter and that's it.Yes some guys can move up and down a class and be a top fighter but that's it.The TOP fighter is generally a heavyweight.So my question again what's the P4P formula? There is none.
The bottom line is the Best Fighter in the world right now is FEDOR.
Just sick of hearing the B.S. term of pound for pound or maybe call it kilo for kilo.Let's just stick with Best Fighter.
|
|
|
Post by ajstyles888 on Jul 20, 2008 12:21:14 GMT -5
Silva = Number 1 and Fedor = Number 2
- Iron Heart
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Jul 20, 2008 13:07:01 GMT -5
The term Pound for Pound we hear everywhere is crap.I'm sick of hearing it,especially from Dana's mouth.We hear it in boxing and now in MMA. How do you measure P4P? Is there a formula? Each weight class has it's best fighter and that's it.Yes some guys can move up and down a class and be a top fighter but that's it.The TOP fighter is generally a heavyweight.So my question again what's the P4P formula? There is none. The bottom line is the Best Fighter in the world right now is FEDOR. Just sick of hearing the B.S. term of pound for pound or maybe call it kilo for kilo.Let's just stick with Best Fighter. Funny, cuz many MMA sites and mags rank Fedor as the best pound for pound fighter.
|
|
PdW2kX
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 8, 2007 23:34:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,551
|
Post by PdW2kX on Jul 20, 2008 13:11:43 GMT -5
Because this thread is about Fedor being #1, shouldn't it be in the Other Feds board?
Also, q(V_V)p to the continued P4P suckitude.
Why we can't all agree to disagree and yet still agree that both Fedor and Silva reek of awesomeness...is beyond me.
|
|
Johnny Lawrence - Cobra Kai
Main Eventer
Promotional consideration paid for by the following
Joined on: Jul 25, 2005 17:12:49 GMT -5
Posts: 3,209
|
Post by Johnny Lawrence - Cobra Kai on Jul 20, 2008 13:59:01 GMT -5
Pound for pound is a topic for stimulating discussion... nothing more, nothing less. There will never be a formula, because one isn't needed. Everyone will have an opinion. Everyone will make their argument, some more compelling than others.
But at the end of the day, it's an imaginary thing. There is no plausible way to know for sure who the best pound for pound fighter is. Which is why it's such a great topic of discussion: There are multiple arguments to be made.
I think people should always take a pound-for-pound discussion or ranking with a grain of salt, because we're never going to see what Fedor ACTUALLY fights like against a 145-pounder, and let's hope we never see a 250-pound Urijah Faber, either. So, relax... it's just a conversation starter.
|
|
lonedog
Superstar
Joined on: May 26, 2004 11:15:47 GMT -5
Posts: 534
|
Post by lonedog on Jul 20, 2008 14:02:42 GMT -5
The thread isn't about who the best P4P fighter is,it's about the term "pound for pound" term being worthless. period. It should be who the greatest fighter is........which is by far FEDOR. Nobody has yet to answer my question of what is the formula to determine P4P? ?
|
|
lonedog
Superstar
Joined on: May 26, 2004 11:15:47 GMT -5
Posts: 534
|
Post by lonedog on Jul 20, 2008 14:05:36 GMT -5
Pound for pound is a topic for stimulating discussion... nothing more, nothing less. There will never be a formula, because one isn't needed. Everyone will have an opinion. Everyone will make their argument, some more compelling than others. But at the end of the day, it's an imaginary thing. There is no plausible way to know for sure who the best pound for pound fighter is. Which is why it's such a great topic of discussion: There are multiple arguments to be made. I think people should always take a pound-for-pound discussion or ranking with a grain of salt, because we're never going to see what Fedor ACTUALLY fights like against a 145-pounder, and let's hope we never see a 250-pound Urijah Faber, either. So, relax... it's just a conversation starter. Alright finally a decent reply.......I know there's no formula, I'm just sick of hearing the term P4P always being thrown around.
|
|
|
Post by ajstyles888 on Jul 20, 2008 14:12:24 GMT -5
The thread isn't about who the best P4P fighter is,it's about the term "pound for pound" term being worthless. period. It should be who the greatest fighter is........which is by far FEDOR.Nobody has yet to answer my question of what is the formula to determine P4P? ? Ever heard of Anderson Silva ? I guess not .... - Iron Heart
|
|
lonedog
Superstar
Joined on: May 26, 2004 11:15:47 GMT -5
Posts: 534
|
Post by lonedog on Jul 20, 2008 14:14:32 GMT -5
The thread isn't about who the best P4P fighter is,it's about the term "pound for pound" term being worthless. period. It should be who the greatest fighter is........which is by far FEDOR.Nobody has yet to answer my question of what is the formula to determine P4P? ? Ever heard of Anderson Silva ? I guess not .... - Iron Heart So your saying Silva would beat Fedor?
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Jul 20, 2008 15:11:33 GMT -5
Silva = Number 1 and Fedor = Number 2 - Iron Heart Anderson Silva has 4 losses on his record. Fedor has one, which was a COMPLETE SHAM if you go back and watch it. So much of a sham that most people don't even consider it a loss, given that the way he lost was illegal in the first place. Fedor has beaten everyone they have put in front of him -- and decisively. For Fedor to not be ranked No. 1 in the world is total bull ****, and you know it. ... And I completely agree that the term "Pound for Pound" is crap.
|
|
DWright
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 7, 2005 18:30:58 GMT -5
Posts: 3,839
|
Post by DWright on Jul 20, 2008 15:19:32 GMT -5
Ever heard of Anderson Silva ? I guess not .... - Iron Heart So your saying Silva would beat Fedor? So you're saying Jake O'Brien is better than Urijah Faber? O'Brien would most definitely beat a guy he outweighs by more than 100 pounds, so therefore, he's the better fighter, right? O'Brien would probably lay on top of Faber for 3 rounds and the fight is over. Lyoto Machida fought BJ Penn at 205 and in all honesty, probably should have won in a split decision (if not lose) since he ran more than he engaged. But you're willing to say Machida is a better POUND FOR POUND fighter than BJ Penn? Your philosophy is way off. Pound for pound doesn't have a set formula, but it's still a great way to measure talent in fighters in different weight classes. The formula would basically consist of: A. Rank of opponents in that given weight class(es) B. Who that fighter has fought C. Who that fighter has beat D. The dominance (see: Anderson Silva, MW division, UFC) It can be argued that Fedor is the best pound for pound fighter in the world, but saying it's a lock is just a fan being biased. Fedor has 1 fight in 2008. 2 in 07, and 2 in 06. Other than Sylvia (who like it or not, was a big name for him to dominate), he hadn't beat anyone in his weight class since Cro Cop. He beat Lindland, but he usually fights at 185/205. Anderson Silva on the other hand, has DESTROYED everyone he's fought. Including Rich Franklin (x2), Chris Leben (very hard chin, hard to knock out...he knocked him out), Travis Lutter (defined Silvas ground game in this fight), Dan Henderson, Nate Marquardt, and now he moved up to destroy James Irvin, who had probably just broken into the top 15 LHW, or ast least was on the cusp of doing so. Fedors lack of fights and lack of opponents really put him behind. But POUND FOR POUND, Silva is probably a better fighter right now.
|
|
lonedog
Superstar
Joined on: May 26, 2004 11:15:47 GMT -5
Posts: 534
|
Post by lonedog on Jul 20, 2008 16:26:47 GMT -5
So your saying Silva would beat Fedor? So you're saying Jake O'Brien is better than Urijah Faber? O'Brien would most definitely beat a guy he outweighs by more than 100 pounds, so therefore, he's the better fighter, right? O'Brien would probably lay on top of Faber for 3 rounds and the fight is over. Lyoto Machida fought BJ Penn at 205 and in all honesty, probably should have won in a split decision (if not lose) since he ran more than he engaged. But you're willing to say Machida is a better POUND FOR POUND fighter than BJ Penn? Your philosophy is way off. Pound for pound doesn't have a set formula, but it's still a great way to measure talent in fighters in different weight classes. The formula would basically consist of: A. Rank of opponents in that given weight class(es) B. Who that fighter has fought C. Who that fighter has beat D. The dominance (see: Anderson Silva, MW division, UFC) It can be argued that Fedor is the best pound for pound fighter in the world, but saying it's a lock is just a fan being biased. Fedor has 1 fight in 2008. 2 in 07, and 2 in 06. Other than Sylvia (who like it or not, was a big name for him to dominate), he hadn't beat anyone in his weight class since Cro Cop. He beat Lindland, but he usually fights at 185/205. Anderson Silva on the other hand, has DESTROYED everyone he's fought. Including Rich Franklin (x2), Chris Leben (very hard chin, hard to knock out...he knocked him out), Travis Lutter (defined Silvas ground game in this fight), Dan Henderson, Nate Marquardt, and now he moved up to destroy James Irvin, who had probably just broken into the top 15 LHW, or ast least was on the cusp of doing so. Fedors lack of fights and lack of opponents really put him behind. But POUND FOR POUND, Silva is probably a better fighter right now. When did I ever mentioned Jake O'Brien or Urijah Faber?...But I'll give you a honest answer to a stupid question.Jake would eventually mount Faber and TKO him with stikes. Once again when did I ever mention B.J.Penn or Machida???Your analysis to that fight actually proves my point.P4P means nothing. P4P means absolutely nothing except for a fancy P.R. word. Dana uses it because he doesn't have greatest fighter in the world. You can tell your in Love with Silva and there's no doubt he's the best middleweight and can beat most of the middle to lower ranked lightheavyweights but he's far from the BEST fighter in the world,pound for pound,height for height or whatever else you want to call it. The best FIGHTER is FEDOR...
|
|
|
Post by ajstyles888 on Jul 20, 2008 16:41:07 GMT -5
Lonedog i'm done reading your posts because from what i read you don't know what your talking about. Here you are saying Faber would lose and that Silva is '' far '' from the best. That's stupid to say ..
- Iron Heart
|
|
DWright
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 7, 2005 18:30:58 GMT -5
Posts: 3,839
|
Post by DWright on Jul 20, 2008 16:44:33 GMT -5
So you're saying Jake O'Brien is better than Urijah Faber? O'Brien would most definitely beat a guy he outweighs by more than 100 pounds, so therefore, he's the better fighter, right? O'Brien would probably lay on top of Faber for 3 rounds and the fight is over. Lyoto Machida fought BJ Penn at 205 and in all honesty, probably should have won in a split decision (if not lose) since he ran more than he engaged. But you're willing to say Machida is a better POUND FOR POUND fighter than BJ Penn? Your philosophy is way off. Pound for pound doesn't have a set formula, but it's still a great way to measure talent in fighters in different weight classes. The formula would basically consist of: A. Rank of opponents in that given weight class(es) B. Who that fighter has fought C. Who that fighter has beat D. The dominance (see: Anderson Silva, MW division, UFC) It can be argued that Fedor is the best pound for pound fighter in the world, but saying it's a lock is just a fan being biased. Fedor has 1 fight in 2008. 2 in 07, and 2 in 06. Other than Sylvia (who like it or not, was a big name for him to dominate), he hadn't beat anyone in his weight class since Cro Cop. He beat Lindland, but he usually fights at 185/205. Anderson Silva on the other hand, has DESTROYED everyone he's fought. Including Rich Franklin (x2), Chris Leben (very hard chin, hard to knock out...he knocked him out), Travis Lutter (defined Silvas ground game in this fight), Dan Henderson, Nate Marquardt, and now he moved up to destroy James Irvin, who had probably just broken into the top 15 LHW, or ast least was on the cusp of doing so. Fedors lack of fights and lack of opponents really put him behind. But POUND FOR POUND, Silva is probably a better fighter right now. When did I ever mentioned Jake O'Brien or Urijah Faber?...But I'll give you a honest answer to a stupid question.Jake would eventually mount Faber and TKO him with stikes. Once again when did I ever mention B.J.Penn or Machida???Your analysis to that fight actually proves my point.P4P means nothing. P4P means absolutely nothing except for a fancy P.R. word. Dana uses it because he doesn't have greatest fighter in the world. You can tell your in Love with Silva and there's no doubt he's the best middleweight and can beat most of the middle to lower ranked lightheavyweights but he's far from the BEST fighter in the world,pound for pound,height for height or whatever else you want to call it. The best FIGHTER is FEDOR... You said "Could Silva beat Fedor." Therefore, I compared other fights that would be completely out of weight class, proving that pound for pound does make sense. I agree that Jake O'Brien would beat Urijah Faber. He weights 100 pounds more and is obviously strong due to his size. Does this mean Jake O'Brien is better than Faber? Machida, who fights at 205, beat BJ Penn, who fights at 155 and has fought at 170, does this mean Machida is a better fighter than Penn? No, it means Machida had a considerable size advantage. Is Eddie Sanchez a better fighter than Kid Yamamoto? Is Antoni Hardonk a better fighter than Miguel Torres? Is Justin McCully a better fighter than Roger Huerta? All of those answers are very obvious. No. But they'd all more than likely beat them, because of their size advantage. But that by no means they're better figthers. Better striking, better JJ, better wrestling, better ground defense, better sprawls, better cardio, etc, etc + better opponents, more fights, more dominant victories... These are all things that make a fighter better than others. Some 155ers are better than some 230ers. (hell, the LW division is MUCH better than the HW division), but that doesn't mean they'd win in those match ups head to head. But POUND FOR POUND, they're better fighters. And for the record, I'm not even an Anderson Silva fan. Hell, I DESPISE that piece of crapKid Yamamoto, but he is one of the best POUND FOR POUND fighters in the world today. But with MORE fights, against BETTER fighters, in what's a BETTER division, he's dominated everyone he's stepped in the ring with, while improving each time. And because of his recent dominance and amount of fights he's been taking on, he's moved in front of Fedor in not only MY mind, but the minds of many in the world of MMA.
|
|
lonedog
Superstar
Joined on: May 26, 2004 11:15:47 GMT -5
Posts: 534
|
Post by lonedog on Jul 20, 2008 18:03:13 GMT -5
Lonedog i'm done reading your posts because from what i read you don't know what your talking about. Here you are saying Faber would lose and that Silva is '' far '' from the best. That's stupid to say .. - Iron Heart You are one of the most useless posters on any forum out here.Just stick with copying and pasting old or newer information from mma websites on the board,that's the only thing your good for on here. Of course Faber would lose to Jake O'Brien,obviously you have no clue who O'Brien is. When did I say Silva is "far" from the best.Read before you write or don't write at all.
|
|
lonedog
Superstar
Joined on: May 26, 2004 11:15:47 GMT -5
Posts: 534
|
Post by lonedog on Jul 20, 2008 18:19:00 GMT -5
When did I ever mentioned Jake O'Brien or Urijah Faber?...But I'll give you a honest answer to a stupid question.Jake would eventually mount Faber and TKO him with stikes. Once again when did I ever mention B.J.Penn or Machida???Your analysis to that fight actually proves my point.P4P means nothing. P4P means absolutely nothing except for a fancy P.R. word. Dana uses it because he doesn't have greatest fighter in the world. You can tell your in Love with Silva and there's no doubt he's the best middleweight and can beat most of the middle to lower ranked lightheavyweights but he's far from the BEST fighter in the world,pound for pound,height for height or whatever else you want to call it. The best FIGHTER is FEDOR... You said "Could Silva beat Fedor." Therefore, I compared other fights that would be completely out of weight class, proving that pound for pound does make sense. I agree that Jake O'Brien would beat Urijah Faber. He weights 100 pounds more and is obviously strong due to his size. Does this mean Jake O'Brien is better than Faber? Machida, who fights at 205, beat BJ Penn, who fights at 155 and has fought at 170, does this mean Machida is a better fighter than Penn? No, it means Machida had a considerable size advantage. Is Eddie Sanchez a better fighter than Kid Yamamoto? Is Antoni Hardonk a better fighter than Miguel Torres? Is Justin McCully a better fighter than Roger Huerta? All of those answers are very obvious. No. But they'd all more than likely beat them, because of their size advantage. But that by no means they're better figthers. Better striking, better JJ, better wrestling, better ground defense, better sprawls, better cardio, etc, etc + better opponents, more fights, more dominant victories... These are all things that make a fighter better than others. Some 155ers are better than some 230ers. (hell, the LW division is MUCH better than the HW division), but that doesn't mean they'd win in those match ups head to head. But POUND FOR POUND, they're better fighters. And for the record, I'm not even an Anderson Silva fan. Hell, I DESPISE that piece of **** Kid Yamamoto, but he is one of the best POUND FOR POUND fighters in the world today. But with MORE fights, against BETTER fighters, in what's a BETTER division, he's dominated everyone he's stepped in the ring with, while improving each time. And because of his recent dominance and amount of fights he's been taking on, he's moved in front of Fedor in not only MY mind, but the minds of many in the world of MMA. I understand where you coming from,I know what P4P is perceived as,I'm just sick of the term being thrown around like the best P4P fighter in the world is THEE best overall fighter in the world.
|
|
|
Post by trivium666 on Jul 20, 2008 18:22:59 GMT -5
Lonedog i'm done reading your posts because from what i read you don't know what your talking about. Here you are saying Faber would lose and that Silva is '' far '' from the best. That's stupid to say .. - Iron Heart You are one of the most useless posters on any forum out here.Just stick with copying and pasting old or newer information from mma websites on the board,that's the only thing your good for on here. Of course Faber would lose to Jake O'Brien,obviously you have no clue who O'Brien is. When did I say Silva is "far" from the best.Read before you write or don't write at all. about 3 posts ago dumabass....
|
|
DWright
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 7, 2005 18:30:58 GMT -5
Posts: 3,839
|
Post by DWright on Jul 20, 2008 18:23:42 GMT -5
You said "Could Silva beat Fedor." Therefore, I compared other fights that would be completely out of weight class, proving that pound for pound does make sense. I agree that Jake O'Brien would beat Urijah Faber. He weights 100 pounds more and is obviously strong due to his size. Does this mean Jake O'Brien is better than Faber? Machida, who fights at 205, beat BJ Penn, who fights at 155 and has fought at 170, does this mean Machida is a better fighter than Penn? No, it means Machida had a considerable size advantage. Is Eddie Sanchez a better fighter than Kid Yamamoto? Is Antoni Hardonk a better fighter than Miguel Torres? Is Justin McCully a better fighter than Roger Huerta? All of those answers are very obvious. No. But they'd all more than likely beat them, because of their size advantage. But that by no means they're better figthers. Better striking, better JJ, better wrestling, better ground defense, better sprawls, better cardio, etc, etc + better opponents, more fights, more dominant victories... These are all things that make a fighter better than others. Some 155ers are better than some 230ers. (hell, the LW division is MUCH better than the HW division), but that doesn't mean they'd win in those match ups head to head. But POUND FOR POUND, they're better fighters. And for the record, I'm not even an Anderson Silva fan. Hell, I DESPISE that piece of **** Kid Yamamoto, but he is one of the best POUND FOR POUND fighters in the world today. But with MORE fights, against BETTER fighters, in what's a BETTER division, he's dominated everyone he's stepped in the ring with, while improving each time. And because of his recent dominance and amount of fights he's been taking on, he's moved in front of Fedor in not only MY mind, but the minds of many in the world of MMA. I understand where you coming from,I know what P4P is perceived as,I'm just sick of the term being thrown around like the best P4P fighter in the world is THEE best overall fighter in the world. I think it's used in most cases perfectly fine. The reason you're upset is because Dana White is trying to market his top fighter as the best fighter in the world. It's a business, and a smart business move. Many casual MMA fans know UFC, they watch UFC. For many, they don't know who Fedor even is. Dana is trying to make money of his fighters. To even promote anyone outside of his company as the best fighter in the world, would be a horrible move by him. Why try to sell other people on other companies? But I won't argue that right NOW, Anderson Silva is the best pound for pound fighter in the world. When/If Fedor fights 3 times a year, and starts facing the competition he can now face (or re-face) with guys like Barnett, Couture, Rothwell, Arlovski, etc. I would put him right back on that pedestal. The ONLY reason I pick Silva right now is his track record over the past 2 years, while Fedor has taken on minimal opponents, and not even decent ones at that. Beating up Yao Ming doesn't overly impress me.
|
|
|
Post by ajstyles888 on Jul 20, 2008 18:32:09 GMT -5
Lonedog i'm done reading your posts because from what i read you don't know what your talking about. Here you are saying Faber would lose and that Silva is '' far '' from the best. That's stupid to say .. - Iron Heart You are one of the most useless posters on any forum out here.Just stick with copying and pasting old or newer information from mma websites on the board,that's the only thing your good for on here. Of course Faber would lose to Jake O'Brien,obviously you have no clue who O'Brien is. When did I say Silva is "far" from the best.Read before you write or don't write at all. This IS a message board. And i think everyone around here apperciates when i pass along MMA related news. This isn't the only section i post on for your information. And for the record you just made a complete ass out of your self when you said '' When did i say Silva is far from the best ? '' Because we all saw where you said that.
|
|
|
Post by ajstyles888 on Jul 20, 2008 18:33:41 GMT -5
You are one of the most useless posters on any forum out here.Just stick with copying and pasting old or newer information from mma websites on the board,that's the only thing your good for on here. Of course Faber would lose to Jake O'Brien,obviously you have no clue who O'Brien is. When did I say Silva is "far" from the best.Read before you write or don't write at all. about 3 posts ago dumabass.... Thank you ! + 1 - Iron Heart
|
|