|
|
Post by iyfwkidzc on Aug 6, 2008 15:38:14 GMT -5
Greetings fellow pic fedders.
The following message concerns youtube feds that have frequently shown up on the board.
I was thinking.
Do you think Youtube feds should be put in discussion?
Since there won't be a Youtube fed board anytime soon, if not ever.
So, Yes? or No?
We're looking for 10 "Yes" answers or 10 "No" answers.
|
|
|
|
Post by (=wwefan617=) on Aug 6, 2008 15:40:04 GMT -5
if youtube feds do not have their own board then i would say give them their own thread. it would be much easier. but putting them in discussion would serve the same purpose so i'll say yes. =)
|
|
|
|
Post by takerfandan on Aug 6, 2008 16:07:03 GMT -5
no way it would just ruin the disscusion thread, just make A THREAD called YOUTUBE FEDS tbh
|
|
|
|
Post by iyfwkidzc on Aug 6, 2008 16:10:44 GMT -5
no way it would just ruin the disscusion thread, just make A THREAD called YOUTUBE FEDS tbh We're going to put the thread in discussion.  |
|
Dyamez
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 24, 2006 14:30:15 GMT -5
Posts: 1,394
|
Post by Dyamez on Aug 6, 2008 16:43:31 GMT -5
why not just let them have their own thread?
|
|
|
|
Post by (=wwefan617=) on Aug 6, 2008 16:52:51 GMT -5
why not just let them have their own thread? i think you are confusing the chat thread with the discussion thread. this very thread itself is a thread inside of the discussion thread |
|
whatthe[img]http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/wfcensored.gif[/img]isrop
Guest
|
Post by whatthe[img]http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/wfcensored.gif[/img]isrop on Aug 6, 2008 17:32:49 GMT -5
YouTube feds are a cancer eating away at the core of pic fedding. Is it any coincidence that when people refer to the glory days of pic fedding there were no youtube/video feds?
|
|
|
|
Post by iyfwkidzc on Aug 6, 2008 17:37:16 GMT -5
[quote author="@whatthe  isrop" timestamp="1218061969" source="/post/1515119/thread"]YouTube feds are a cancer eating away at the core of pic fedding. Is it any coincidence that when people refer to the glory days of pic fedding there were no youtube/video feds?[/quote] Yes. And the thing is, youtubers actually think youtube feds are good.  But whatever. |
|
whatthe[img]http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/wfcensored.gif[/img]isrop
Guest
|
Post by whatthe[img]http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/wfcensored.gif[/img]isrop on Aug 6, 2008 17:38:26 GMT -5
Well, youtubers are bad people and they should feel bad.
What happened to the board that this degree of crapwas tolerated?
|
|
|
|
Post by iyfwkidzc on Aug 6, 2008 17:56:48 GMT -5
I don't know.
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Aug 6, 2008 20:02:19 GMT -5
Perosnally i dont have a problem with youtube feds as long as they are shows. One match...you tube or not is not a show. A show consistes of backstage stuff 2 or more matches, commentary. IMO. If it's just a match or a bunch of ani's it needs locked.
|
|
Dyamez
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 24, 2006 14:30:15 GMT -5
Posts: 1,394
|
Post by Dyamez on Aug 6, 2008 20:07:48 GMT -5
well yeah I'm ok with them having a thread in discussion..
I can only think that if they can't get their own board... don't you think they are not worth it?
I'm sorry no offense meant to youtube fedders, I can also imagine that youtube feds may be the future of fedding if done properly. But for now PIC fed is PICTURE federation, not video or animation federation. Maybe they can have a thread in the ani board?
|
|
|
|
Post by alex123ecw on Aug 7, 2008 17:06:33 GMT -5
They should have a sticked thread in the pic fed board saying " Post badYoutubefeds here".
|
|
