|
|
Post by Dan88 on Feb 8, 2011 19:39:40 GMT -5
Wonder who else are on 99%? I got a 75% for posting a photo of donuts.  LMAO, how random |
|
|
|
Post by Dan88 on Feb 8, 2011 19:47:11 GMT -5
Maybe 1 day?  |
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Feb 9, 2011 6:31:05 GMT -5
I can only speak on the ones I give. I'm sure there are plenty of warnings in the past that are borderline. Also, there are plenty of times you get away without a warning. It evens out. Truth is, if you don't act up, you don't get warnings. It actually is that simple. Unless the admins like you, then you get away with it all. It's a joke to get warning bars for calling a guy a douche. Yet I report someone calling me a "  ing spaz" and they get away with it. Please, go ahead and explain that. Biased as admins is the explination. |
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Feb 9, 2011 9:14:38 GMT -5
Yes the only answer must be biased admins. That is the only possible solution to your conundrum. You just happen to be on the super secret dossier of members we intentionally try to screw over whenever given the opportunity. The secret is out and the illuminati is panicking.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Feb 9, 2011 9:22:22 GMT -5
Well done on ignoring the fact you admins ignored when I reported someone for name calling but I get a warning bar for it. If that's not biased then please explain why that happened.
|
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Feb 9, 2011 9:31:43 GMT -5
Show me the post or report. We only get about a hundred of them a day. I can't say what happened because I don't remember it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Feb 9, 2011 9:35:44 GMT -5
Thread got moved to evidence room now. But when I reported it JS read my pm and just locked the thread. He didn't do his normal reply to say the member had been warned.
Wouldn't surprise me if he didn't get warned and it got moved because of the off topic discussion.
|
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Feb 9, 2011 9:37:51 GMT -5
So you don't know for sure they weren't warned, you just assume he wasn't? All this and you aren't even sure? Link me to that persons account and give me a time frame of when it happened and I'll tell you. FYI I never reply to the reporter when I dish out warnings. Makes the job take twice as long.
|
|
|
|
Post by chaz on Feb 9, 2011 9:40:24 GMT -5
I got a 25% warning bar for sharing a friendly joke with someone in a discussion thread.
The warning bars are handed out on far too many occasions for the most trivial and unnecessary incidents. Yet, over the past week I've seen people called 'retards', 'idiots', etc. on the WWE board and my guess is not a single thing was done. I reported someone and, again, I doubt anything was done. It does seem that the veteran members are tolerated more.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Feb 9, 2011 9:42:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Feb 9, 2011 9:43:17 GMT -5
I got a 25% warning bar for sharing a friendly joke with someone in a discussion thread. The warning bars are handed out on far too many occasions for the most trivial and unnecessary incidents. Yet, over the past week I've seen people called 'retards', 'idiots', etc. on the WWE board and my guess is not a single thing was done. I reported someone and, again, I doubt anything was done. It does seem that the veteran members are tolerated more. I got 25% for calling Mr Old School an idiot, even though he trolls every week and gets away with it. |
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Feb 9, 2011 9:45:09 GMT -5
You doubt anything was done, or you know nothing was done. Only mods and admins can see the warning bars and notes, so you really don't know if we did anything or not. You just have in your mind that we are biased and we don't do anything except try to screw people. So you just assume we did nothing. But you don't even know, or try to find out whether we did or not?
Sometimes we are more lenient than others. It happens. Sometimes when there is fighting we will just lock the thread and move on. Sometimes if it's bad enough everyone who participated will get a warning. Sometimes if we are in a bad mood, we are less likely to let it go that someone got called a douche. We're human. Just like any real judge. Sometimes if you are a frequent troublemaker, you're less likely to be let go. That's life. But you guys just assuming that we are singling you out and trying to somehow screw you is ridiculous. You call someone an a-hole, we don't know if you are joking or not. Want to be safe, don't call someone an a-hole.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Feb 9, 2011 9:50:36 GMT -5
Way to ignore what I said again.
So go ahead and tell me, was anything done for his insult to me?
|
|
|
|
Post by chaz on Feb 9, 2011 9:52:09 GMT -5
I can understand that you get a lot of reports and it may be a lengthy process to go through them all. But if that's the case, does it not make more sense to dedicate that time to focus on the more serious or offensive incidents? You can't say that a harmless discussion where profanity is used is worth a warning bar or worse than someone being verbally put down and called a 'intellectually- disabled person'. That's the kind of thing that seems to slide. I assume nothing was done because the culprits carry on doing it as if no warning was made. I'm sure if I was warned for such an incident I'd make sure to avoid it again.
|
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Feb 9, 2011 9:53:51 GMT -5
name calling - TRW - Issued: Feb 3, 2011, 1:10pm Happy? |
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Feb 9, 2011 9:55:41 GMT -5
I got a 25% warning bar for sharing a friendly joke with someone in a discussion thread. The warning bars are handed out on far too many occasions for the most trivial and unnecessary incidents. Yet, over the past week I've seen people called 'retards', 'idiots', etc. on the WWE board and my guess is not a single thing was done. I reported someone and, again, I doubt anything was done. It does seem that the veteran members are tolerated more. I got 25% for calling Mr Old School an idiot, even though he trolls every week and gets away with it. And you report him every time he does it right? I assume so. And to be honest, sometimes your definition of trolling is different from ours. |
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Feb 9, 2011 9:56:39 GMT -5
Should have deleted the reply too at same time, tbh.
But if he got warned then yeah sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Feb 9, 2011 10:00:06 GMT -5
I got 25% for calling Mr Old School an idiot, even though he trolls every week and gets away with it. And you report him every time he does it right? I assume so. And to be honest, sometimes your definition of trolling is different from ours. Im sure some one reports him. And yeah I guess it is since I got reported by a mod for trolling when I had a negative opinion. I didn't get a warning for that so I guess that you/JS actually agreed with me on the fact it was opinion and not trolling. |
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Feb 9, 2011 10:04:50 GMT -5
I usually delete the posts, sometimes I forget. It happens to be honest. But once it was moved to the evidence room, it was a moot point. Sometimes we do that so we can go back and see what the issue was. But he was warned, just like you asked. So I don't see why you were so bent out of shape about it.
Sometimes we mess up, sure. But most of the time we do our job, and we do it well.
|
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Feb 9, 2011 10:07:04 GMT -5
And you report him every time he does it right? I assume so. And to be honest, sometimes your definition of trolling is different from ours. Im sure some one reports him. And yeah I guess it is since I got reported by a mod for trolling when I had a negative opinion. I didn't get a warning for that so I guess that you/JS actually agreed with me on the fact it was opinion and not trolling. I don't think they do report him. I haven't seen a report come in on him in quite some time. So, if you want something reported, the only way to be sure is if you do it yourself. You can't just assume that someone else has or will do it, then be upset that nothing was done. I know I can come across as a jerk sometimes, but seriously, work with us here guys. We're not trying to be unfair to anybody. |
|
