|
Post by Joey Cush on Sept 14, 2008 22:31:17 GMT -5
When you went onto TNAwrestling.com, the first thing that you saw was that graphic. So, the most important thing should always be first. So it was a big deal when it turned out to be NOTHING.
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Sept 14, 2008 22:33:18 GMT -5
You keep going on, but you said you don't care. Do you like everything about TNA or does it just come off that way? I already asked him that earlier in the thread. He would not answer my post. Hmm.. 19 pages. Do you really think I saw your post with all these other replies? I didn't. Also, JOey why do you even care about the graphic? If the first thing on the website is more important then the video game is more important than Bound For Glory as well as the Knockouts DVD since it's 2nd.
|
|
|
Post by wwf1990 on Sept 14, 2008 22:37:22 GMT -5
^^ It's not that it's the most important, it's the first thing they wanted people to see.
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Sept 14, 2008 22:38:18 GMT -5
^^ It's not that it's the most important, it's the first thing they wanted people to see. But, that's not what he said. He said the most important things should always be first. I agree with you but that's not what he said. Also, even if the thing was a tease it's not like it was Bound For Glory or something. If it was BFG then it would be a big deal but it's No Surrender so it's nothing major or huge especially when the buy rate comes in it won't be a big jump or nothing from that one graphic. Also, I'm not fighting or whatever just stating my opinion much like y'all are - nothing more, nothing less.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 3:41:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2008 22:40:10 GMT -5
Yes, TNA is trying to get as much publicity for this game as possible right now. No Surrender is over and Bound For Glory isn't for another 4 weeks. TNA's main focus ( publicity wise ) is their first video game.
But if you guys want to continue this, please do so in PM's ( send me the juicy details, haha ). Back onto what's really important here...
I'm officially not ordering Bound For Glory, due to not wanting to sit through another crappy Sting main event... where he'll most likely walk out champion. The only that'll make me order is an AMAZING ( not just good ) undercard. Which I doubt will happen.
- Triple S
|
|
|
Post by kimberlysghost on Sept 14, 2008 22:42:02 GMT -5
I'm sorry. I didn't mean to start a fight. :/
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Sept 14, 2008 22:42:37 GMT -5
I'm actually excited for BFG (Yeah, I know what a surprise. Sue me) Sting/Joe - Who knows. Sting might put JOe over which would be a huge shock and mean more than Sting winning. Jarrett/Angle is gonna happen no doubt. Two years in the making Beer Money/LAX SSOS most likley Creed vs. Bashir vs. Petey - Ultimate X maybe? then the Knockouts match and so on. So, it has promise. I'm sorry. I didn't mean to start a fight. :/ Me either. It was more so of a dis-agreeing with ones opinion. Atleast we didn't resort to name calling .
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 3:41:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2008 22:45:31 GMT -5
Not saying it was a fight at all, and definitely wasn't only directed at either of you. Just saying, if you want to continue the debate... please do so in PM's.
- Triple S
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Sept 14, 2008 22:46:28 GMT -5
So, is there anything you don't like about TNA?
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Sept 14, 2008 22:46:31 GMT -5
Anywho, not the greatest PPV by any means but I enjoyed it for the mostpart.
|
|
|
Post by layton on Sept 14, 2008 22:48:45 GMT -5
I already asked him that earlier in the thread. He would not answer my post. Hmm.. 19 pages. Do you really think I saw your post with all these other replies? I didn't. Also, JOey why do you even care about the graphic? If the first thing on the website is more important then the video game is more important than Bound For Glory as well as the Knockouts DVD since it's 2nd. Yet, you still do not respond to the question. Interesting.
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Sept 14, 2008 22:49:25 GMT -5
Maybe I didn't respond because it has NOTHING to do with No Surrender. Feel free to PM if you're just dying to know which I find funny.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Sept 14, 2008 22:53:00 GMT -5
You're right. You couldn't take one post to say it and be done with. You had to drag it out and then finally say PM you.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 3:41:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2008 23:17:45 GMT -5
You're right. You couldn't take one post to say it and be done with. You had to drag it out and then finally say PM you. In all fairness, Slappy... it isn't on topic and would be considered spamming. If you would like to know his response, PM him. If he doesn't answer, then I dunno what to tell you. But it shouldn't be discussed in here. - Triple S
|
|
|
Post by layton on Sept 14, 2008 23:22:29 GMT -5
Maybe I didn't respond because it has NOTHING to do with No Surrender. Feel free to PM if you're just dying to know which I find funny. You've been talking about the Knockout's DVD and TNA's video game and Bound For Glory. Those do not really have a lot to do with No Surrender either. You can argue and say "But those topics were started because people were talking about the Foley advertisement and I was just proving my point by using those examples, so it does have something to do with No Surrender." Well, the same can be said for me, because my post was in relation to a comment about No Surrender as well. It was a mediocre PPV, and you were justifying it to no end. I was just asking if there was anything you did not like about TNA.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 3:41:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2008 23:24:34 GMT -5
Maybe I didn't respond because it has NOTHING to do with No Surrender. Feel free to PM if you're just dying to know which I find funny. You've been talking about the Knockout's DVD and TNA's video game and Bound For Glory. Those do not really have a lot to do with No Surrender either. You can argue and say "But those topics were started because people were talking about the Foley advertisement and I was just proving my point by using those examples, so it does have something to do with No Surrender." Well, the same can be said for me, because my post was in relation to a comment about No Surrender as well. It was a mediocre PPV, and you were justifying it to no end. I was just asking if there was anything you did not like about TNA. See, this I wouldn't consider spam. Rather than asking why he likes TNA so much... he's asking why he thought No Surrender was such a great show. I'll allow you guys to debate No Surrender, but I won't allow you guys to hound him about being a fanboy of TNA. Hope that makes sense, haha. - Triple S
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Sept 14, 2008 23:27:25 GMT -5
Ugh, another BFG built around Sting?
Judging by his track record in TNA, Joe's not going over him.
|
|
|
Post by Spicoli~! on Sept 14, 2008 23:27:37 GMT -5
happy to see bashir win a title since he was burried alot in WWE...although I would've liked Creed to hold it instead
|
|
|
Post by layton on Sept 14, 2008 23:32:12 GMT -5
You've been talking about the Knockout's DVD and TNA's video game and Bound For Glory. Those do not really have a lot to do with No Surrender either. You can argue and say "But those topics were started because people were talking about the Foley advertisement and I was just proving my point by using those examples, so it does have something to do with No Surrender." Well, the same can be said for me, because my post was in relation to a comment about No Surrender as well. It was a mediocre PPV, and you were justifying it to no end. I was just asking if there was anything you did not like about TNA. See, this I wouldn't consider spam. Rather than asking why he likes TNA so much... he's asking why he thought No Surrender was such a great show. I'll allow you guys to debate No Surrender, but I won't allow you guys to hound him about being a fanboy of TNA. Hope that makes sense, haha. - Triple S I do not mind the fact that he is a TNA fanboy. I am not hounding him about that at all. I am a big TNA fan. I think there need to be more hardcore TNA fans that recognize the talent TNA really has. My problem is the simple fact that there are flaws in the product that I thought it would be safe to assume everyone saw, but as of right now until he answers, I am not sure TNAFan124 sees any of these flaws.
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Sept 14, 2008 23:35:31 GMT -5
How did I justify the PPV to "no end"? I simply said I enjoyed it. I never said it was amazing at all - you want my true opinion on the PPV? Here then:
Prince Justice vs. Rock N' Rave Infection - Far from the best match ever but I was entertained by Curry Man and Christy. It even had some solid action in it. PPV worthy? Proball not but it served it's job as a "filler"
Kong vs. ODB - Soild match. Not up to par with their Against All Odds(?) match but solid match with some solid action. Kinda disappointed with ODB jobbing out to Kong because it could've skyrocketed her into a match vs. Tayor Wilde for the title.
Abyss/Morgan vs. 3D - Sloppy city. Bored.
Taylor/Angelina - Not up to Knockouts par but still very enjoyable. Could've delt without Rhino and Kip being at ringside but still enjoyed it.
Bashir/Williams/Creed - Awesome back and forth action between the three, nice little spots and a shocking ending that made me HATE Bashir for screwing Petey out of retaining the title - his job was done.
Lethal/Dutt - great action, very good finish that made me want to beat the crap out of Val for screwing Lethal over. Still very good match.
Beer Money vs. LAX - It was.. umm.. blah. Nothing like Hard Justice but far from the worst match.
AJ/Trigg - I enjoyed it. I see why others didn't enjoy it but I found it very good and imo it kinda put AJ over as "tough" since he could've easily got knocked out by Trigg or taped out but he didn't. Then him saying he's a wrestler and tha'ts not what he does put him over aswell.
Main Event - Very good way to end the show and I marked out like a little girl when Jarrett hit Angle with the gutair and handed Joe the title.
Overall - I was entertained. It wasn't the best PPV this year but better than Victory Road imo. Out of 10 - I would say 6 1/2 of 10
|
|