|
|
Post by iyfwkidzc on Aug 19, 2008 9:41:50 GMT -5
why should he care about the fate of the company when tna is thorwing a way money on pac man jones and the other useless althles/celebrities TNA giving money to Pacman? Haven't seen that for about a year. And WWE hiring Freddie Prinze Jr. isn't "useless"? |
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Aug 19, 2008 11:16:50 GMT -5
I really want Sting to have one run in WWE but there isnt anyone I would really wanna see him against. Him vs Taker or him vs HBK just dont do anything for me. Taker and Sting dont really have anything between them....I mean whats the build up? They both wear black...Its gonna be a Johnny Cash on a pole match......Then with HBKs knees and back I dont think the match could be as entertaining as It would have been 10 years ago
|
|
StingerSplash™
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 23, 2006 14:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 1,429
|
Post by StingerSplash™ on Aug 20, 2008 16:13:50 GMT -5
I'm with Jarrett on this one. He's most likely the highest paid guy and he comes back March 27th (?) and then disappears.. comes back.. and is gonna dis-appear again. He doesn't do house shows, he rarley does tv and I don't see him being worth more money then the guys who work all the shows. Screw name value in the sense of paying a guy a truckload of money to work maybe 20 shows a year. Kurt might be paid alot but atleast Kurt - ya know - earns it. u cant say any of this. u dont know how much sting is getting paid. u dont know how much anyone is getting paid. i have a feeling there are many people who are getting overpaid. not just sting. one of my favorite wrestlers is kurt angle and i have a feeling he is getting paid the most out of any of the wrestlers there. im sure sting is getting paid what he deserves. many people might stop watching tna is sting left. |
|
|
|
Post by Ultimate Figure Collector on Aug 20, 2008 16:26:54 GMT -5
Sting is such a waste but it's also TNA's fault for always building around Sting when Bound For Glory comes around.
|
|
|
|
Post by laythvandam on Aug 20, 2008 16:27:03 GMT -5
Why all the hate for Sting?
He's one of the greatest and in my opinion THE greatest of all time, he's getting paid whatever he is because he deserves it, moreso than any of the no names that are around in TNA, he's above getting the sack and he deserves that money like it or not, if he was doing nothing for the company they'd let him go, but he is, he's still a draw.
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Aug 20, 2008 16:58:47 GMT -5
I'm with Jarrett on this one. He's most likely the highest paid guy and he comes back March 27th (?) and then disappears.. comes back.. and is gonna dis-appear again. He doesn't do house shows, he rarley does tv and I don't see him being worth more money then the guys who work all the shows. Screw name value in the sense of paying a guy a truckload of money to work maybe 20 shows a year. Kurt might be paid alot but atleast Kurt - ya know - earns it. u cant say any of this. u dont know how much sting is getting paid. u dont know how much anyone is getting paid. i have a feeling there are many people who are getting overpaid. not just sting. one of my favorite wrestlers is kurt angle and i have a feeling he is getting paid the most out of any of the wrestlers there. im sure sting is getting paid what he deserves. many people might stop watching tna is sting left. It came out that Sting's getting atleast 500,000. You're also missing my point.. - For the time Sting works he doesn't deserve that much. If he worked a Kurt Angle schudle - yes he would. - Kurt works select house shows, every PPV, every TV. - Sting works NO house shows, selevt PPVs, select TV So, Kurt deserves his. Sting doesn't. Also, noone started watching TNA because of Sting. The ratings have been the same since the day he came in (he got them their first 1.2.. nothing higher) so I doubt anyone would stop watching because he left. Why all the hate for Sting? He's one of the greatest and in my opinion THE greatest of all time, he's getting paid whatever he is because he deserves it, moreso than any of the no names that are around in TNA, he's above getting the sack and he deserves that money like it or not, if he was doing nothing for the company they'd let him go, but he is, he's still a draw. That's the thing - he's not a draw anymore. Look at TNA's ratings - ever since he came in they've been the same. Did he get TNA their first 1.2? Sure, but the next week it went back to normal. He's not a draw anymore. |
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Aug 20, 2008 17:11:13 GMT -5
Why all the hate for Sting? For me, because he's not WCW Sting... he's a family man and born again Christian in face paint. |
|
The Doctor
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 3, 2002 19:03:52 GMT -5
Posts: 3,446
|
Post by The Doctor on Aug 20, 2008 21:38:09 GMT -5
That's the thing - he's not a draw anymore. Look at TNA's ratings - ever since he came in they've been the same. Did he get TNA their first 1.2? Sure, but the next week it went back to normal. He's not a draw anymore. If that is your measuring stick, then I hate to break it to you, but, nobody is a draw in TNA. |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Aug 20, 2008 21:47:45 GMT -5
That's the thing - he's not a draw anymore. Look at TNA's ratings - ever since he came in they've been the same. Did he get TNA their first 1.2? Sure, but the next week it went back to normal. He's not a draw anymore. If that is your measuring stick, then I hate to break it to you, but, nobody is a draw in TNA. That's not what I'm saying dude. Everyone acts like Sting came in and ratings went from 0.2 to 1.2 when in reality it didn't. They're over hyping Sting's "drawing power". |
|
