|
|
Post by alexgg on Sept 3, 2008 15:00:13 GMT -5
how do you rate the figure made by jakks out of 5 ?
|
|
|
|
Post by The L.F.C Fan on Sept 3, 2008 15:00:44 GMT -5
3-5 - good.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 2:54:27 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2008 15:02:32 GMT -5
4/5 for me...there not really excellent
|
|
|
|
Post by Legends Collector on Sept 3, 2008 15:06:42 GMT -5
4/5-Great
|
|
STING
Main Eventer
Mattel Basic Legends/Flashback Collector
Joined on: Sept 4, 2007 19:39:59 GMT -5
Posts: 2,816
|
Post by STING on Sept 3, 2008 15:12:05 GMT -5
The CS line is EXCELLENT. Others, I would say are GOOD.
|
|
|
|
Post by hbk4champ on Sept 3, 2008 15:20:25 GMT -5
it's funny how everyone is saying that they don't think there excellant but that has the most votes. i voted great.
|
|
|
|
Post by ericbischoff on Sept 3, 2008 18:24:12 GMT -5
Depend on the figure, really. Overally I'd say "Good"
|
|
|
|
Post by JCF on Sept 3, 2008 18:26:35 GMT -5
Jakks provides us great lines 99 % of the time. We get new stars and updated attires fast, usually. I'd say they do great. Not excellent, as some things from time to time are a bust.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Sept 3, 2008 18:27:26 GMT -5
I give them a 2 and I'm being generous.
|
|
|
|
Post by sos6 on Sept 3, 2008 18:44:13 GMT -5
I give them a 4/5. Jakks are usually great with ocassional bad sets so I give them a 4.
|
|
|
|
Post by axemurderer on Sept 3, 2008 18:47:23 GMT -5
I have to go with an AVG 3. some figures have a complete 5 Star but then some of the figures come out a huge letdown...Case in point..RA35 Edge..5 Stars....but then you get something that could have been a HUGE figure..and it comes out like CSTT Kane with an RA5 repainted head...what a dissapointment.
|
|
|
|
Post by Next Manufactured’s Sweater on Sept 3, 2008 19:01:58 GMT -5
3 - average. There's so much reusing of parts, scans etc. That's probably a necessity for the frequency and price range of the figures, but still... It isn't a great output. For example, every RA Edge figure released lately (RA29, PPV16, AD28, RA35?) has been basically a repaint with maybe a hand switch. Same for every RA Matt Hardy for the last year or so. And when was the last time RA Cena wasn't screaming?
I also find the choices of figures a little odd. There have been way too many Elijah Burkes and Boogeymans considering how much either of them have been on TV.
|
|
|
|
Post by WalterF on Sept 3, 2008 19:09:33 GMT -5
I gave them a GREAT score, the second highest.
They produce so much great product and of course they re-use parts, but with the roster they're making and the sheer volume of figures they produce, to me, it's very understandable.
They release a lot of great lines and I think they are good at creating figures of new stars and when they make a figure well, they really do it. DA16 Edge, for example, absolutely outstanding. JAKKS makes a lot of figures that are truly great. They are also good with attires and keep the attires/looks of most figures very updated and done well.
I also just like the overall figures themselves. I like the kind of plastic they are, how they are articulated and how durable they are.
|
|
|
|
Post by Next Manufactured’s Sweater on Sept 3, 2008 19:19:42 GMT -5
I also just like the overall figures themselves. I like the kind of plastic they are, how they are articulated and how durable they are. That's a good point. They are very good figures, aside from occasional nitpicking details. I love BCA and TTL figures (and I think BCAs are still the most playable, with the possible exception of BNB) but Jakks really improved on them with the RA style. The articulation of the arms is a thousand times better than it was on TTLs. |
|
|
|
Post by BØRNS on Sept 3, 2008 19:25:12 GMT -5
It varies from figure to figure. There are some figs that are amazing, and then there are figs that are not worth the shipping rate....
|
|
|
|
Post by Artistix on Sept 3, 2008 20:52:56 GMT -5
By an overall action figure standard, I gave them 'good' 3/5
If soo many figures weren't missing tatoos & other various details, they would have scored 4/5.
If Jakks had used proper scale (ie - Kendrick not as tall as Undertaker, Mickie not towering over Beth) & more realistic bodies & paint work, they would have scored 5
|
|
|
|
Post by Vamp55 on Sept 3, 2008 22:06:10 GMT -5
i think there figures are great. Some get excellent, and some are just good. I think 4/5 is a fair call.
|
|
Irish Ghost
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Joined on: Mar 5, 2008 15:23:06 GMT -5
Posts: 1,674
|
Post by Irish Ghost on Sept 3, 2008 23:24:05 GMT -5
id say a 4/5
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Sept 4, 2008 0:04:52 GMT -5
They fluctuate.
I mean they can make perfect figs when they want to but then they can get a ZERO for rereleasing a crappy fig over and over again..
I guess the average would be like 3.5 imo.
|
|
plasticsuperstar
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 27, 2006 12:58:06 GMT -5
Posts: 4,085
|
Post by plasticsuperstar on Sept 4, 2008 0:15:00 GMT -5
Most of them are awesome but the ones that suck really do suck. The main problem is scale and considering they could've sorted out the scale of the whole RA/CS line with less new molds than most other companies make for each and every figure then that's unforgivable and means that Jakks don't really want to be very good.
|
|
