|
Post by TurboEddie on Sept 7, 2008 1:39:02 GMT -5
Well do you. Why is it when a certain wrestler you don't like does something its terrible but when someone you like does it,its okay. Examples *Edge cashes in Money in the Bank=Genius *Punk does it=hate *Big Show,Cena,Kane,Undertaker,Batista all beat Khali or Umaga withing one or two matches=fair *Triple H does it=burying(Same with the dog situation) *Punk has been World Champ for 4 months=fine *Triple H 5 or 6 months=boredom!(is two months really that much of a difference) *Rey Mysterio isn't main event/WHC=too small *6ft 220 Pound Jericho=Next World Champion *Jeff Hardy does drugs=pot head and undeserving bastard! *HBK does drugs(90's)=Future Hall of Famer(same with RVD from what I've heard) *Jeff Hardy=all he ever did was jump off of ladders *Edge=Former 4(?) time world champion(RVD as well former 1 time WWE champion) *WWE never pushes any new talent They get about 20 fresh faces crazy pushes and you people hate almost all of them. *Punk=not WHC material *The Kendrick=needs to be next WWE champion (might be wrong on that one) *Kofi Kingston=did nothing to win the IC title *Santino's first and current run with the belt(he was like jobbing to Beth and D'lo and Mickie for about a month or two,no one seems to complain then) There are probably more but those are the only ones I have. Besides that it just seems like a lot of people are just never satisfied on here. Its like you get what you want(Punk as Champion,Shelton as Champion,new talent almost every week,interesting feuds, and pushes for all your favorites)yet you still aren't happy. I don't understand. Oh, my God, somebody FINALLY sees things the same way I do. Nobody is ever satisfied.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. McCluer on Sept 7, 2008 1:41:17 GMT -5
i totally agree, lol. but Jericho should be next champion jsut saying but i like rey as champ too
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Sept 7, 2008 4:05:11 GMT -5
To a degree though wrestling fans are fickle by nature. I thought we all knew this.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 30, 2024 2:50:35 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2008 5:13:13 GMT -5
the Triple H thing. i was thinking about this last night watching sd!. Regarding HHH's matches with Umaga/ Khali, Cena got a fluke win over Umaga at NYR 07, and then won a brutal LMS at Royal Rumble 07, in which Umaga still looked like a beast, and wasn't harmed by the loss. same with Khali. Cena got a submission win at JD 07, after capitalizing on Khali being floored, which had not happened many times before. then at SNME, Khali cleanly pinned Cena with one foot after his double handed chokeslam. then at ONS 07, Cena won after an FU, which was impressive. Triple H bloodied Umaga to explain his first suspension. then when Umaga came back, he beat Umaga clean at No Mercy in his 2nd match of the night. and then again beat him at Cyber Sunday. With Khali the past month, i'll admit the Summerslam match wasn't god awful, but Tripper still broke out of the vice grip, which no one was able to. and then last night, he is double handed chokeslammed, but kicks out of a pinfall, and can be able to taunt and pose after the spinebuster he hits, before hitting a pedigree and winning. great post-I agree 100%.+1 for you man
|
|
missedgehead
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 14, 2008 22:24:41 GMT -5
Posts: 3,178
|
Post by missedgehead on Sept 7, 2008 10:30:10 GMT -5
Wrestling fans are pretty fickle. That is my opinion. About the MITB, Edge is a heel and Punk is a face. I mean, it kind of makes sense that is cool that Edge does it. Edge is an awesome wrestler , refering to the Jeff Hardy comparison, and can wrestle a normal match. Jeff, to me, is a spot fest.
|
|
|
Post by Kody on Sept 7, 2008 11:00:06 GMT -5
Well do you. Why is it when a certain wrestler you don't like does something its terrible but when someone you like does it,its okay. Examples *Edge cashes in Money in the Bank=Genius *Punk does it=hate *Big Show,Cena,Kane,Undertaker,Batista all beat Khali or Umaga withing one or two matches=fair *Triple H does it=burying(Same with the dog situation) *Punk has been World Champ for 4 months=fine *Triple H 5 or 6 months=boredom!(is two months really that much of a difference) *Rey Mysterio isn't main event/WHC=too small *6ft 220 Pound Jericho=Next World Champion *Jeff Hardy does drugs=pot head and undeserving bastard! *HBK does drugs(90's)=Future Hall of Famer(same with RVD from what I've heard) *Jeff Hardy=all he ever did was jump off of ladders *Edge=Former 4(?) time world champion(RVD as well former 1 time WWE champion) *WWE never pushes any new talent They get about 20 fresh faces crazy pushes and you people hate almost all of them. *Punk=not WHC material *The Kendrick=needs to be next WWE champion (might be wrong on that one) *Kofi Kingston=did nothing to win the IC title *Santino's first and current run with the belt(he was like jobbing to Beth and D'lo and Mickie for about a month or two,no one seems to complain then) There are probably more but those are the only ones I have. Besides that it just seems like a lot of people are just never satisfied on here. Its like you get what you want(Punk as Champion,Shelton as Champion,new talent almost every week,interesting feuds, and pushes for all your favorites)yet you still aren't happy. I don't understand. Yeah, I agree with almost everything you said man. But, we need to face it...WF/the IWC will NEVER be happy...ever.
|
|
|
Post by rockbottom42385 on Sept 7, 2008 13:05:52 GMT -5
CM Punk was a face while he done this. Edge wasn't. Batista and Cena made Umaga look like a savage to stop, Triple H...didn't. CM Punk has only had the world title TWICE, Triple H had it 12 times. Edge does more ground wrestling than Jeff Hardy RVD was only on pot whereas Jeff Hardy was on well..everything. Brian Kendrick isnt WWEC material Rey Mysterio AND Jericho desearve world titles. Don't care what anybody says. It doesn't matter if CM Punk was a face when he cashed in Money In The Bank, that doesn't make him untalented. Everyone worships Edge on here anyway. He's great no doubt, one of my favorites, but CM Punk is a great talent as well. Edge' first cashing in was good, his second one was boring on the Undertaker. Actually, that is one of my least favorite moments in WWE history. I like the first time and CM Punk's cashing in equally. I am not a fan of RVD's or Edge's second cashing in.
|
|
|
Post by TeamExtreme718x on Sept 7, 2008 14:22:19 GMT -5
I think you pretty much exactly right with everything but the Punk reign for 4 months and HHH for 6 months..This is HHHs 12th title reign..As it is only Punks first..
|
|
Hollywood QJD
Main Eventer
Awesome Enters
Joined on: Aug 27, 2008 15:03:06 GMT -5
Posts: 4,040
|
Post by Hollywood QJD on Sept 7, 2008 16:03:47 GMT -5
Well do you. Why is it when a certain wrestler you don't like does something its terrible but when someone you like does it,its okay. Examples *Edge cashes in Money in the Bank=Genius *Punk does it=hate Last time i checked, CM punk wasnt nicknamed, " the Ultimate Opportunist." Also, he's no where near Edge's level.
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Sept 7, 2008 16:48:46 GMT -5
Wrestling fans are pretty fickle. That is my opinion. About the MITB, Edge is a heel and Punk is a face. I mean, it kind of makes sense that is cool that Edge does it. Edge is an awesome wrestler , refering to the Jeff Hardy comparison, and can wrestle a normal match. Jeff, to me, is a spot fest. Though Jeff in the last year has really picked up his game and is doing the little things in the ring that make the match good.
|
|