|
|
Post by The Sexy Psychotic on Jul 21, 2009 14:41:02 GMT -5
Right, now first off I just want to say that this is purley speculation by myself, but it does seem logical.
O.K, so the whole PG thing started last year, around the time Triple H was on SD! and had just won the Title, but also he had just had his 2nd child. So, I'm having a stab in the dark, that its possible that due to Triple H having 2 young kids, it may have kinda shoved Vince to make the decision to go PG, which took out any real violence that was present.
So, now we are being told about the writers going more TV-13/14. This seems fishy to me as, well we're near SummerSlam, and we've pretty much been told that the idea all along has been for an Orton/Hunter HIAC match at SS as the blow-out. So, could this chnage maybe have to do with Triple H wanting to have a massive win, but bloodying Orton up bad winning his Title back? I mean it makes sense, we had a HIAC match last year, yet it stayed PG, yet when Triple H is going into a HIAC match the PG thing starts to get faded out. Just a thought
Discuss
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. McCluer on Jul 21, 2009 14:44:45 GMT -5
yea its gonna fade plus we are getting more and more of the diva stuff like we used to diva swimsuits and dancing and all that so im sure pg is going out the door
|
|
|
|
Post by Byron F'N Saxton Fan on Jul 21, 2009 14:56:39 GMT -5
HHH and Orton will be as blloody as last years Cell match. I think with a whole show dedicated to having the main events in the Cell, They will have their Cell match then. This PG crap needs to go though.
|
|
Kid Lightning
Superstar
Joined on: Dec 21, 2002 17:15:17 GMT -5
Posts: 961
|
Post by Kid Lightning on Jul 21, 2009 14:56:45 GMT -5
I really do not think we will see Orton vs HHH in HIAC at Summerslam cause isn't there a PPV called Hell in a Cell now?
|
|
|
|
Post by jeffhardy0101 on Jul 21, 2009 15:20:17 GMT -5
As much as I hate the PG Rating the Hell In The Cell Match between Edge and The Undertaker at SummerSlam was just fine last year. We will probably get the Randy Orton Vs Triple H Hell In The Cell match at Hell In The Cell (the PPV). Randy Orton and Triple H cant put on a decent match to save their life so a Hell In The Cell Match wont really interest me. I wont belive WWE has gone back to TV 13/14 until we start seeing blood again though Shawn Michaels juiced last year at The Great American Bash and WWE was PG then. Hmmm.
|
|
|
|
Post by mnm213 on Jul 21, 2009 15:27:27 GMT -5
Who cares tbh? It's still wrestling, not like all matches are contended in a debating contest.
People overract at this PG thing, if you don't like it - don't watch. You wanted WRESTLING and less promos, now we got that, less divas in swimsuits, less promos, and now you're all mad over it. You'll all be complaining again when it goes back, believe me.
|
|
|
|
Post by jeffhardy0101 on Jul 21, 2009 15:36:06 GMT -5
My only beef with the PG Rating is that the wrestling is less violent. There are alot of small things I don't like about it like WWE mainly doing everything to please the kids but I just hate that the matches arn't as violent as they used to be. I liked brutal, bloddy matches not just watered down brutality.
|
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jul 21, 2009 16:06:08 GMT -5
I don't think Triple H had anything to do with the PG thing. They say Linda was the one pushing for it. If they drop it, it will only be to increase ratings.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Future on Jul 21, 2009 16:19:44 GMT -5
Who cares tbh? It's still wrestling, not like all matches are contended in a debating contest. People overract at this PG thing, if you don't like it - don't watch. You wanted WRESTLING and less promos, now we got that, less divas in swimsuits, less promos, and now you're all mad over it. You'll all be complaining again when it goes back, believe me. Actually, RAW seems to be nothing but promos, comedy sketches and lame joke matches since the transition to PG. So I don't see your logic there. Just about 20 minutes of in ring action in a two hour span. SD & ECW haven't been affected that much quality wise since the PG switch. Other than the fact that ECW almost never has any extreme rules matches, or anything with the risque content of the original company it's named for. But that's no surprise. |
|
|
|
Post by mnm213 on Jul 21, 2009 16:24:24 GMT -5
Who cares tbh? It's still wrestling, not like all matches are contended in a debating contest. People overract at this PG thing, if you don't like it - don't watch. You wanted WRESTLING and less promos, now we got that, less divas in swimsuits, less promos, and now you're all mad over it. You'll all be complaining again when it goes back, believe me. Actually, RAW seems to be nothing but promos, comedy sketches and lame joke matches since the transition to PG. So I don't see your logic there. Just about 20 minutes of in ring action in a two hour span. SD & ECW haven't been affected that much quality wise since the PG switch. Other than the fact that ECW almost never has any extreme rules matches, or anything with the risque content of the original company it's named for. But that's no surprise. The only promos last night were the ZZ top ones. The rest of the segments were build ups for NOC. And that Hornswoggle/Chavo thing would have been going on if it was PG-13 anyways... |
|
