|
|
Post by THE *Legendary* STINGER on Oct 15, 2009 22:07:23 GMT -5
Are you flippin kidding me?!!!!!
is this right? TNA figures wont be out for another year? could this be wrong?
|
|
|
|
Post by Double J on Oct 15, 2009 22:18:31 GMT -5
I doubt it's wrong, Fall 2010 is their target date, but plans change sometimes.
|
|
|
|
Post by blu3blazer on Oct 15, 2009 22:22:28 GMT -5
They said all along, since the first press release after getting the TNA license, that they wouldn't be out until Fall 2010.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Oct 15, 2009 22:23:50 GMT -5
Probably has something to do with a no compete clause.
|
|
austin209
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
How Bout Them Cowboys
Joined on: Jan 17, 2009 1:33:17 GMT -5
Posts: 1,707
|
Post by austin209 on Oct 15, 2009 23:00:13 GMT -5
I can't believe rsc has mattell wwe for pre order already and most are out of stock
|
|
|
|
Post by Raoul the Great on Oct 15, 2009 23:07:13 GMT -5
Wow, that is BAD planning. Nothing like giving Mattel a massive headstart in the competition.
I don't honestly understand the delay. Jakks has known of this for HOW LONG? And what is up with the half-assed final series and dropping figures from line-ups? I figured it was for TNA's benefit. Now it was clearly laziness.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Dude on Oct 15, 2009 23:10:44 GMT -5
HAHA, I like this. More space for Mattel.
|
|
|
|
Post by legionofsemidoom on Oct 16, 2009 0:55:03 GMT -5
I can't believe rsc has mattell wwe for pre order already and most are out of stock They werent in stock to begin with |
|
thespecialone
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 8, 2009 17:48:05 GMT -5
Posts: 2,762
|
Post by thespecialone on Oct 16, 2009 0:58:09 GMT -5
lmfao i knew this would happen but oh well only figures i want are the jarrett and angle thats it You first said you just wanted angle...Now you want jarrett too. I give you a week to see the light, want them all and finally realise how crappy mattel head scans are... |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Oct 16, 2009 0:58:46 GMT -5
You guys ever think it's a LEGAL reason? And not just Jakks going "Oh..no.. we'll wait until June"?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Dude on Oct 16, 2009 1:05:26 GMT -5
You guys ever think it's a LEGAL reason? And not just Jakks going "Oh..no.. we'll wait until June"? It's not. Their contract is up, therefore they have no obligations to WWE. Just like when a superstar's contract is up, he can do as he please, unless he is released from his contract then he has a 90 no compete clause. Because their contract is finished then there is no legal matter involved. |
|
MakaiClub
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 23, 2003 4:34:50 GMT -5
Posts: 3,477
|
Post by MakaiClub on Oct 16, 2009 1:49:07 GMT -5
Frankly I wonder if TNA will even be in business a year from now.
|
|
Joe CR
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 10, 2008 5:54:34 GMT -5
Posts: 2,980
|
Post by Joe CR on Oct 16, 2009 2:20:52 GMT -5
No Steiner/Booker then as according to reports, they're on their way out. Sting could be going as soon as Sunday. Angle could have gone by then as could Jarrett. Can't see Foley being there much longer as well as Nash. A lot can happen in a year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Oct 16, 2009 2:23:44 GMT -5
Why are you shocked that it will be a year? Jakks has a lot of work to do figuring out all the details they are going to take off of the protos.
lol
|
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Oct 16, 2009 2:49:51 GMT -5
Frankly I wonder if TNA will even be in business a year from now. Yeah, because people have wondered that for the past 7 years and what do you know, it aint happended yet. |
|
|
|
Post by DZ: WF Legacy on Oct 16, 2009 3:36:29 GMT -5
I'm worried that by that time it might be too late for Sting. I mean they could always sign him to a special contract if he does indeed leave soon, but who knows.
|
|
|
|
Post by LeighD on Oct 16, 2009 4:55:00 GMT -5
You guys ever think it's a LEGAL reason? And not just Jakks going "Oh..no.. we'll wait until June"? It's not. Their contract is up, therefore they have no obligations to WWE. Just like when a superstar's contract is up, he can do as he please, unless he is released from his contract then he has a 90 no compete clause. Because their contract is finished then there is no legal matter involved. Not trying to knock on you, but have you read Jakks' WWE and TNA licensing contracts? There are more than 1 kind of contracts in this world, most are unique to be honest. |
|
|
|
Post by The Dude on Oct 16, 2009 6:10:28 GMT -5
It's not. Their contract is up, therefore they have no obligations to WWE. Just like when a superstar's contract is up, he can do as he please, unless he is released from his contract then he has a 90 no compete clause. Because their contract is finished then there is no legal matter involved. Not trying to knock on you, but have you read Jakks' WWE and TNA licensing contracts? There are more than 1 kind of contracts in this world, most are unique to be honest. No, but they wouldn't add a stipulation saying you can't produce any other wrestling figures for almost a year. That's absurd, and only an idiot would sign hat deal.. I'm that Jakks has their own reasons, and whatever that may be it's a huge mistake. |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Oct 16, 2009 6:20:02 GMT -5
yea, really makes no sense, if thats the case then why show anything now...why not just wait till Feb toy fair. By then Booker, scott, sting prob wont even be there. Plus it gives a leg up for Mattel to get their product out. I guess it wont matter to them casue Jakks will still have WWE toys on the shelves.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan88 on Oct 16, 2009 13:40:02 GMT -5
Why are you shocked that it will be a year? Jakks has a lot of work to do figuring out all the details they are going to take off of the protos. lol lol that wouldn't surprise me if it was true  |
|
