|
|
Post by MichaelTheMartian on Dec 22, 2009 8:45:47 GMT -5
The title pretty much says it all, should the WWE make it like that again? Maybe ECW being feautred on both RAW & Smackdown ones. It gives more fueds to happen on the shows and more young guys to make appearances on the PPV.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kyle - legendkilla2k9 on Dec 22, 2009 9:04:14 GMT -5
Maybe.
I think some people would lose interest as not all of the main talent would be shown, but it is a good way to have lesser talent on ppvs and titles like US and Inter would be more serious.
|
|
|
|
Post by Zeke on Dec 22, 2009 9:11:04 GMT -5
Maybe one or two a brand a year.
|
|
Ross
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 21, 2008 9:43:29 GMT -5
Posts: 3,154
|
Post by Ross on Dec 22, 2009 9:13:58 GMT -5
i say yes but let ecw join sd's it gives more people storylines and alows them to build the storylines for longer
|
|
|
|
Post by machoking on Dec 22, 2009 9:19:19 GMT -5
No. Single branded PPV's rarely delivered as an entire show, they had some great matches now and again; but the quality overall fluctuated way too much. At least with joint branded PPV's we're normally guaranteed at least a few good matches.
|
|
June
Main Eventer
High Fives All Around!!!
Joined on: May 31, 2009 10:54:49 GMT -5
Posts: 4,457
|
Post by June on Dec 22, 2009 9:19:19 GMT -5
The single brand PPV's were terrible with the exception of a few. I'm glad they are gone.
|
|
|
|
Post by ericbischoff on Dec 22, 2009 9:26:35 GMT -5
WWE already done it, I guess they don't do it anymore because that doesn't make lots of profits? So, I believe WWE try make decents match from tri-brands, such as Cena vs Jericho, Undertaker vs Batista and Christian vs Shelton Benjamin, where all would want to see it and buy the PPV.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yeezy's Mullet: Team X Blades on Dec 22, 2009 10:05:31 GMT -5
No thank you. They were rarely ever good shows as a whole. And most of the time, unless it was a gimmick match, the main event wasn't that goo either. The greatest perk from having those PPVs was that we got to see the CW division flourish. Besides that we've been able to see the same things and have the same things happen with or without them.
|
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Dec 22, 2009 11:05:03 GMT -5
Hell no! Felt like I was watching episodes of Raw and SmackDown on pay-per-view.
|
|
|
|
Post by ZMaster on Dec 22, 2009 12:39:57 GMT -5
It was a bad idea the first time around. I didn't feel like watching an extended version of Raw and Smackdown on PPV. I didn't find the PPVs that great but that's just me.
|
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Dec 22, 2009 12:41:50 GMT -5
Raw can barely handle their own two hour show, let alone a three hour Pay-Per-View.
|
|
elmsrock
Main Eventer
Dollars and Destruction
Joined on: Jan 26, 2005 10:12:17 GMT -5
Posts: 1,571
|
Post by elmsrock on Dec 22, 2009 13:17:51 GMT -5
It was okay when they did this with a little deeper talent roster, like in 2005. But I think now it is a bad idea. Look at the three hour Raws and super shows, they are so much better because of the interaction between all the brands!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 12, 2024 0:54:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2009 9:59:50 GMT -5
Raw can barely handle their own two hour show, let alone a three hour Pay-Per-View. they handle their three hour raw's just fine in my opinion as for the ppv's no...i remeber it got to the point where we would have impromptu matches on spot which something you wanna stay away from in ppv's |
|
|
|
Post by XHW on Dec 23, 2009 10:28:33 GMT -5
yes, it gave most of the roster a chance to wrestle and show their skills, now it is just the best 20 wrestlers in WWE
|
|
|
|
Post by The Silent Flute (joepetree) on Dec 23, 2009 10:37:10 GMT -5
I say no because you get better matches for a tri branded ppv rather then a sing branded ppv
|
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Dec 23, 2009 10:49:10 GMT -5
no. the whole thing was just a gimmick to try and get people to buy more shows.
|
|
WM = "The Viper"
Main Eventer
I hear voices in my head, they council me, they understand...
Joined on: Apr 19, 2006 13:13:11 GMT -5
Posts: 1,617
|
Post by WM = "The Viper" on Dec 23, 2009 11:30:24 GMT -5
Yes, because not everyone gets to shine on the weekly shows. The PPV's would help them do that. But if this were to happen, ECW would probably have to be gone, as the roster is too small to make a whole PPV (I like ECW, I'm just saying).
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 12, 2024 0:54:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2009 12:01:09 GMT -5
Yeah, I mean it worked out so well in previous years, what with matches the likes of Kenzo Suzuki vs. Charlie Haas, Orlando Jordan vs. Heidenreich, and Gregory Helms vs. Super Crazy tearing it up on PPV. ... wait, what?  |
|
