|
|
Post by Dan on Dec 30, 2009 8:56:50 GMT -5
I think the whole Undertaker V Shawn Michaels Rematch is being spoken of and built up, so that Shawn can turn on Triple H.
If Shawn Michaels wins the Royal Rumble, and Triple H is Champion come the Elimination Chamber PPV, he will have the choice to choose which Champion he faces. Perhaps, they are building up the idea so much that everyone expects Shawn to choose Taker... when he turns on Triple H and faces him at Wrestlemania.
Undertaker V John Cena could also then happen.
Just a glimmor of hope that they could both still go down?
|
|
Vintage ToneBoat
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 27, 2008 14:17:16 GMT -5
Posts: 2,097
|
Post by Vintage ToneBoat on Dec 30, 2009 9:00:28 GMT -5
i thought they were hinting at cena vs taker for this year with taht tag match on raw back in october (?) where cena hit the f-u on taker at the end for no reason
|
|
The Stranger
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 21, 2007 1:09:47 GMT -5
Posts: 2,200
|
Post by The Stranger on Dec 30, 2009 9:16:47 GMT -5
That's actually a great idea. I wouldn't mind seeing HBK/Taker II or HBK/HHH. As long as Shawn is heel in both feuds, it's all gravy.
|
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Dec 30, 2009 11:55:07 GMT -5
i thought they were hinting at cena vs taker for this year with taht tag match on raw back in october (?) where cena hit the f-u on taker at the end for no reason Taker actually tombstoned Cena |
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Dec 30, 2009 12:16:36 GMT -5
i thought they were hinting at cena vs taker for this year with taht tag match on raw back in october (?) where cena hit the f-u on taker at the end for no reason Taker actually tombstoned Cena I think the original plan was to have Undertaker V Cena, and then DX split up for Triple H V Shawn Michaels at Wrestlemania, which is really the only logical reason for DX getting back together again this year. But, since they got the Bret V Vince Match going now, it might make things too overpacked to have three massive Storylines this big going on at once, and may take it away from the Bret angle with DX splitting up. Which is why the only logical reason for it to still go down this way is for HBK to choose Triple H over Undertaker if he wins the Royal Rumble. |
|
gravedigger3
Main Eventer
Empire Wrestling Federation
Joined on: Apr 7, 2006 21:17:04 GMT -5
Posts: 3,434
|
Post by gravedigger3 on Dec 30, 2009 12:30:40 GMT -5
that would be nice
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Giggs' Munchies on Dec 30, 2009 13:38:02 GMT -5
Taker actually tombstoned Cena I think the original plan was to have Undertaker V Cena, and then DX split up for Triple H V Shawn Michaels at Wrestlemania, which is really the only logical reason for DX getting back together again this year. But, since they got the Bret V Vince Match going now, it might make things too overpacked to have three massive Storylines this big going on at once, and may take it away from the Bret angle with DX splitting up.Which is why the only logical reason for it to still go down this way is for HBK to choose Triple H over Undertaker if he wins the Royal Rumble. WM XIX was a Hogan return, but they still managed Rock - Austin, HHH - Booker T and Lesnar - Angle. |
|
|
|
Post by miserere on Dec 30, 2009 18:13:00 GMT -5
I think the original plan was to have Undertaker V Cena, and then DX split up for Triple H V Shawn Michaels at Wrestlemania, which is really the only logical reason for DX getting back together again this year. But, since they got the Bret V Vince Match going now, it might make things too overpacked to have three massive Storylines this big going on at once, and may take it away from the Bret angle with DX splitting up.Which is why the only logical reason for it to still go down this way is for HBK to choose Triple H over Undertaker if he wins the Royal Rumble. WM XIX was a Hogan return, but they still managed Rock - Austin, HHH - Booker T and Lesnar - Angle. Triple H/Booker T over HBK's return to WrestleMania against Jericho? Odd. Especially considering Hogan was at WMX8, as well. |
|
|
|
Post by gordon on Dec 30, 2009 18:21:04 GMT -5
Maybe HBK doesn't win the Rumble, maybe Taker loses the title.
Maybe it's D-X vs BOD at Mania?
|
|
|
|
Post by ericbischoff on Dec 30, 2009 18:23:28 GMT -5
I would love to see Shawn Michaels vs HHH at SummerSlam. Let have Undertaker vs Shawn Michaels at WrestleMania, but in some speciality match. I mean not like as Hell in a Cell as it wont make sense for the WrestleMania.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ldeow on Dec 30, 2009 18:26:12 GMT -5
yes i would much rather see trips shawn then shawn taker again.
|
|
|
|
Post by mnm213 on Dec 30, 2009 19:03:18 GMT -5
Shawn better not win the rumble again.
|
|
Dabid
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Mar 9, 2005 8:35:56 GMT -5
Posts: 319
|
Post by Dabid on Dec 30, 2009 20:51:53 GMT -5
Shawn better not win the rumble again. When was the last time Shawn won the Royal Rumble? 1996? God, that's 14 YEARS ago. It's not like he wins it every other year or something...  |
|
|
|
Post by gordon on Dec 30, 2009 21:00:45 GMT -5
Shawn better not win the rumble again. When was the last time Shawn won the Royal Rumble? 1996? God, that's 14 YEARS ago. It's not like he wins it every other year or something... If anyone should be winning 3 Rumble's, it's Shawn. When I think of the Rumble, I think of HBK. |
|
leafs911
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 18, 2007 22:56:50 GMT -5
Posts: 2,004
|
Post by leafs911 on Dec 31, 2009 2:35:23 GMT -5
thats a good idea . . . . but I don't think HBK will win the Rumble . . . . but i still want him to face HHH and not Undertaker two years in a row
|
|
|
|
Post by Ldeow on Dec 31, 2009 2:38:05 GMT -5
Shawn vs Triple H in an Iron man match.
|
|
