Fallen Angel
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 7, 2009 4:11:49 GMT -5
Posts: 1,526
|
Post by Fallen Angel on Jan 30, 2010 13:16:15 GMT -5
lol
|
|
|
|
Post by The Dude on Jan 30, 2010 13:19:48 GMT -5
LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by DontHassleTheHoff on Jan 30, 2010 13:48:04 GMT -5
Hes not wrong...
|
|
|
|
Post by mnm213 on Jan 30, 2010 14:15:46 GMT -5
Hmm... AJ Styles, Kurt Angle, Samoa Joe, Daniels, Ken Anderson... yep, damn those 50 year olds. But I mean, Jericho said it, the same thing WWE marks never shut up about and people claim it's the holy grail. Sorry, but he's wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by hbkmattelfan on Jan 30, 2010 14:23:56 GMT -5
Hmm... AJ Styles, Kurt Angle, Samoa Joe, Daniels, Ken Anderson... yep, damn those 50 year olds. But I mean, Jericho said it, the same thing WWE marks never shut up about and people claim it's the holy grail. Sorry, but he's wrong. Well said bro. Seriously AJ has had the world title since sept and has main evented every ppv since than, but damn those 50 year old headliners. Hall & Waltman have had very small roles in TNA, Hogan has been just an on air character, Sting is not too involved in anything right now, and Flair is basically AJ's mouthpiece of sorts. Where are these 50 year old HEADLINERS Jericho is speaking of? TNA Main eventers at the moment AJ ''im the best thing in wrestling today'' Styles= 31 Kurt Angle= 41 Ken Anderson........... Anderson= 33 Samoa Joe= 30 |
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jan 30, 2010 14:46:11 GMT -5
Hmm... AJ Styles, Kurt Angle, Samoa Joe, Daniels, Ken Anderson... yep, damn those 50 year olds. But I mean, Jericho said it, the same thing WWE marks never shut up about and people claim it's the holy grail. Sorry, but he's wrong. I think Jericho was referring to the fact that TNA has a bunch of washed up old guys who, in all actuality, aren't likely to do the company any favors. I support TNA, and I think what they're trying to do is great, but I think this Hogan and company thing is still too fresh to know whether or not they're in it for the reasons they're saying they are. In a couple months time, Hogan and his boys may shove everyone aside when they're not getting the ratings against WWE that they wanted to. It's too early to tell. I'm not going to judge what Hogan is doing just yet, but putting the idea past him is just ignoring everything Hogan has a history of doing, and I'm not convinced he's reformed just yet. |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jan 30, 2010 14:51:52 GMT -5
Jericho is too awesome.
|
|
|
|
Post by King of Kings on Jan 30, 2010 14:54:44 GMT -5
Well I am a fan of TNA, at the same time I find it funny that the ones saying Jericho is wrong are the ones with TNA sigs.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 30, 2010 14:56:22 GMT -5
Hmm... AJ Styles, Kurt Angle, Samoa Joe, Daniels, Ken Anderson... yep, damn those 50 year olds. But I mean, Jericho said it, the same thing WWE marks never shut up about and people claim it's the holy grail. Sorry, but he's wrong. Well said bro. Seriously AJ has had the world title since sept and has main evented every ppv since than, but damn those 50 year old headliners. Hall & Waltman have had very small roles in TNA, Hogan has been just an on air character, Sting is not too involved in anything right now, and Flair is basically AJ's mouthpiece of sorts. Where are these 50 year old HEADLINERS Jericho is speaking of? TNA Main eventers at the moment AJ ''im the best thing in wrestling today'' Styles= 31 Kurt Angle= 41 Ken Anderson........... Anderson= 33 Samoa Joe= 30 Joe and Anderson aren't headliners, sorry. |
|
|
|
Post by hbkmattelfan on Jan 30, 2010 15:00:14 GMT -5
Well I am a fan of TNA, at the same time I find it funny that the ones saying Jericho is wrong are the ones with TNA sigs. True, i see what your saying for sure but the wwe fans are so biased its not even funny. The politics in in WWE are insane, there are alot more young guys thriving in TNA than their are in WWE. Sure Vince got a Hard on for Sheamus and Drew but how often do the realy talented guys make it to the top in WWE? It's not so much that im defending TNA because im a fanboy, i just simply think the WWE fans are iggnorant. |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jan 30, 2010 15:02:28 GMT -5
Well I am a fan of TNA, at the same time I find it funny that the ones saying Jericho is wrong are the ones with TNA sigs. True, i see what your saying for sure but the wwe fans are so biased its not even funny. The politics in in WWE are insane, there are alot more young guys thriving in TNA than their are in WWE. Sure Vince got a Hard on for Sheamus and Drew but how often do the realy talented guys make it to the top in WWE? It's not so much that im defending TNA because im a fanboy, i just simply think the WWE fans are iggnorant.Elaborate on that last one, buddy. |
|
|
|
Post by hbkmattelfan on Jan 30, 2010 15:02:47 GMT -5
Well said bro. Seriously AJ has had the world title since sept and has main evented every ppv since than, but damn those 50 year old headliners. Hall & Waltman have had very small roles in TNA, Hogan has been just an on air character, Sting is not too involved in anything right now, and Flair is basically AJ's mouthpiece of sorts. Where are these 50 year old HEADLINERS Jericho is speaking of? TNA Main eventers at the moment AJ ''im the best thing in wrestling today'' Styles= 31 Kurt Angle= 41 Ken Anderson........... Anderson= 33 Samoa Joe= 30 Joe and Anderson aren't headliners, sorry. Joe has main evented many a TNA ppv and had the buyrates do quite well considering TNA's growth at the time. Joe is infact a headliner. Anderson will be headlining PPVs any month now. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 30, 2010 15:04:10 GMT -5
Joe and Anderson aren't headliners, sorry. Joe has main evented many a TNA ppv and had the buyrates do quite well considering TNA's growth at the time. Joe is infact a headliner. Anderson will be headlining PPVs any month now. Joe used to be a headliner. Not any more. Anderson will always play second, maybe even third or fourth fiddle to everyone else in the company. |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jan 30, 2010 15:04:54 GMT -5
You agreed that Joe is AT THE MOMENT. Last year isn't at the moment because he wasn't even on the last PPV.
Anderson will never be a true headliner IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by mnm213 on Jan 30, 2010 15:05:28 GMT -5
Well said bro. Seriously AJ has had the world title since sept and has main evented every ppv since than, but damn those 50 year old headliners. Hall & Waltman have had very small roles in TNA, Hogan has been just an on air character, Sting is not too involved in anything right now, and Flair is basically AJ's mouthpiece of sorts. Where are these 50 year old HEADLINERS Jericho is speaking of? TNA Main eventers at the moment AJ ''im the best thing in wrestling today'' Styles= 31 Kurt Angle= 41 Ken Anderson........... Anderson= 33 Samoa Joe= 30 Joe and Anderson aren't headliners, sorry. Spoiler... Joe is fighting AJ for the title at AAO, and is a former world champion. Anderson is fighting in a number one contenders match and has gone over Jarrett and Abyss already.So yes, they ARE main attractions in TNA considering they put time into them and they main event shows. Joe is a former world champion and has a gauranteed title shot. |
|
|
|
Post by hbkmattelfan on Jan 30, 2010 15:08:22 GMT -5
True, i see what your saying for sure but the wwe fans are so biased its not even funny. The politics in in WWE are insane, there are alot more young guys thriving in TNA than their are in WWE. Sure Vince got a Hard on for Sheamus and Drew but how often do the realy talented guys make it to the top in WWE? It's not so much that im defending TNA because im a fanboy, i just simply think the WWE fans are iggnorant.Elaborate on that last one, buddy. I guess blind might have been a better word. Alot of the things WWE fans bash about TNA are things that are plaguing WWE atm. How often does HHH lose a match these days? What are they already using to draw for Wrestlemania, HBK Taker 2. We all know in some form HHH will be in a title Match this year again. WWE is a thousands times worse when it comes to new blood [minus the ones vince has a boner for] get a real chance. Yet TNA is some sort of Retirement home because they give older wrestlers small roles in hopes of breathing life into their characters etc.? |
|
|
|
Post by hbkmattelfan on Jan 30, 2010 15:10:48 GMT -5
Joe has main evented many a TNA ppv and had the buyrates do quite well considering TNA's growth at the time. Joe is infact a headliner. Anderson will be headlining PPVs any month now. Joe used to be a headliner. Not any more. Somebody has not read the spoilers hmmmmmmm  Anderson will always play second, maybe even third or fourth fiddle to everyone else in the company. Way to early to say something like this when he just came in and has already main evented an impact. |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jan 30, 2010 15:14:19 GMT -5
Elaborate on that last one, buddy. I guess blind might have been a better word. Alot of the things WWE fans bash about TNA are things that are plaguing WWE atm. How often does HHH lose a match these days? What are they already using to draw for Wrestlemania, HBK Taker 2. We all know in some form HHH will be in a title Match this year again. WWE is a thousands times worse when it comes to new blood [minus the ones vince has a boner for] get a real chance. Yet TNA is some sort of Retirement home because they give older wrestlers small roles in hopes of breathing life into their characters etc.? The difference between Triple H and these 'older guys' that TNA brings in is that Triple H can still go. He is one of the most polished guys in the ring and people still bust a nut when he comes out. TNA brings in guys people really dont care about, like Orlando Jordan and Sean Morley, going over guys who deserve much better than that. They are using HBK/Undertaker to draw because it was such a draw last year that a lot of people want to see it again; but most likely, it's going to be a swerve. Possibly HBK Vs HHH which could keep HHH out of the title picture but still in a big time match. |
|
|
|
Post by hbkmattelfan on Jan 30, 2010 15:19:58 GMT -5
I guess blind might have been a better word. Alot of the things WWE fans bash about TNA are things that are plaguing WWE atm. How often does HHH lose a match these days? What are they already using to draw for Wrestlemania, HBK Taker 2. We all know in some form HHH will be in a title Match this year again. WWE is a thousands times worse when it comes to new blood [minus the ones vince has a boner for] get a real chance. Yet TNA is some sort of Retirement home because they give older wrestlers small roles in hopes of breathing life into their characters etc.? The difference between Triple H and these 'older guys' that TNA brings in is that Triple H can still go. He is one of the most polished guys in the ring and people still bust a nut when he comes out. TNA brings in guys people really dont care about, like Orlando Jordan and Sean Morley, going over guys who deserve much better than that. They are using HBK/Undertaker to draw because it was such a draw last year that a lot of people want to see it again; but most likely, it's going to be a swerve. Possibly HBK Vs HHH which could keep HHH out of the title picture but still in a big time match. I see what your saying but TNA does not have these guys you talk about headlining. So what if Hogan thinks Jordan will be a star and has him picking up midcard wins. Its not like he brought in the Nasty's and gave them the tag titles. In TNA their main focus is their 31 year old world champion. Everything else is secondary. The WWE champion is a complete after thought to DX. That is just sickening. I will agree with you that DX draws but it still sucks to have to sit through. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 19, 2024 11:03:33 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2010 15:20:10 GMT -5
Jericho's tweets are always awsome, people shouldn't expect less.
|
|
