Mirror Images
Main Eventer
fan since '92
Joined on: Jun 7, 2005 4:07:40 GMT -5
Posts: 2,809
|
Post by Mirror Images on Mar 8, 2010 7:00:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Mar 8, 2010 7:12:39 GMT -5
Wow. Such a great lookin fig. Thanks for the pics
|
|
lVloNsteR DUCK
Mid-Carder
:')
Joined on: Jan 26, 2010 13:28:15 GMT -5
Posts: 122
|
Post by lVloNsteR DUCK on Mar 8, 2010 7:15:41 GMT -5
WOW  i dont collect basics but that may just persuade me to get him  |
|
|
|
Post by purplekangaroo on Mar 8, 2010 7:30:01 GMT -5
Great torso and pants mould- better than Jakks.
Facescan- sucks. Worse than both of Jakks.
|
|
Mirror Images
Main Eventer
fan since '92
Joined on: Jun 7, 2005 4:07:40 GMT -5
Posts: 2,809
|
Post by Mirror Images on Mar 8, 2010 7:33:38 GMT -5
Great torso and pants mould- better than Jakks. Facescan- sucks. Worse than both of Jakks. In person the face scan is far better than jakks.  |
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Mar 8, 2010 7:38:23 GMT -5
I bought it recently too and it is indeed awesome. The body is perfect, specifically suited to khali as are the tights. Did you get the double punjabi version or the one with only one logo? Hopefully you got the one with both. The scan is not as strong as jakks second one but in person its not too far off, only real problem is the hair/forehead looks a tad bit off but its miles and miles better than the first jakks one. Its a great figure for sure and looks great scale wise.
|
|
|
|
Post by purplekangaroo on Mar 8, 2010 7:40:53 GMT -5
Great torso and pants mould- better than Jakks. Facescan- sucks. Worse than both of Jakks. In person the face scan is far better than jakks. Thanks for the close-up. However, i prefer Jakks' non-smiling scan to this sad expression by Mattel. And they painted his eyes wonky too! |
|
Mirror Images
Main Eventer
fan since '92
Joined on: Jun 7, 2005 4:07:40 GMT -5
Posts: 2,809
|
Post by Mirror Images on Mar 8, 2010 7:41:57 GMT -5
I bought it recently too and it is indeed awesome. The body is perfect, specifically suited to khali as are the tights. Did you get the double punjabi version or the one with only one logo? Hopefully you got the one with both. The scan is not as strong as jakks second one but in person its not too far off, only real problem is the hair/forehead looks a tad bit off but its miles and miles better than the first jakks one. Its a great figure for sure and looks great scale wise. No I got the one punjabi version but it doesnt bother me too much. I always thought that Jakks always got Khalis beard wrong they either seemed to do too much stubble or make it too dark. Overall I prefer the mattel scan. The eyes arent wonky on the figure maybe its just the way I took the picture. |
|
|
|
Post by Lk™ on Mar 8, 2010 7:53:48 GMT -5
yeah, that scan looks pretty nice. he looks like punjabi jesus.
|
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Mar 8, 2010 8:00:15 GMT -5
I bought it recently too and it is indeed awesome. The body is perfect, specifically suited to khali as are the tights. Did you get the double punjabi version or the one with only one logo? Hopefully you got the one with both. The scan is not as strong as jakks second one but in person its not too far off, only real problem is the hair/forehead looks a tad bit off but its miles and miles better than the first jakks one. Its a great figure for sure and looks great scale wise. No I got the one punjabi version but it doesnt bother me too much. I always thought that Jakks always got Khalis beard wrong they either seemed to do too much stubble or make it too dark. Overall I prefer the mattel scan. The eyes arent wonky on the figure maybe its just the way I took the picture. As long as youre happy thats what matters.  I prefer the double logo so it looks more complete. Good point ont he stubble. That was a slight letdown on the second scan although they fixed it in the TT and RA42 release. This mattel one got his lips right though and the eyes dont look wonky to me either. |
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Mar 8, 2010 8:46:10 GMT -5
The scale looks perfect. Thanks for the great pics!
|
|
|
|
Post by juicewinslow on Mar 8, 2010 9:09:04 GMT -5
Im really looking forward to this figure. Thanks for posting pics.
I dont understand why they would make 1 with PUNJABI only on 1 side... and 1 with it on both sides... Doesnt make sense to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Mar 8, 2010 9:19:41 GMT -5
They definitley nailed his torso look. Height is good of course.
I don't like Mattel's hands at the wrist joints. His hand turns but not his wrist...that looks weird. His arms are too skinny too.
|
|
|
|
Post by D.B.K. on Mar 8, 2010 11:23:59 GMT -5
cool looking fig
|
|
|
|
Post by spam on Mar 8, 2010 12:17:57 GMT -5
Well the arms are definitely better than the JAKKS one.
|
|
Quincy
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 11, 2003 13:19:53 GMT -5
Posts: 2,674
|
Post by Quincy on Mar 8, 2010 12:56:00 GMT -5
Can you take a comparison pic of the Mattel Khali with a Jakks RA Kane and Jakks DA Kane?
|
|
Mirror Images
Main Eventer
fan since '92
Joined on: Jun 7, 2005 4:07:40 GMT -5
Posts: 2,809
|
Post by Mirror Images on Mar 8, 2010 13:06:50 GMT -5
Can you take a comparison pic of the Mattel Khali with a Jakks RA Kane and Jakks DA Kane?   ill try and do the others soon |
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Mar 8, 2010 13:14:09 GMT -5
Everything about Mattel's Khali is better than Jakks' Khali.
|
|
thereklessone
Main Eventer
23 Refs and counting!
Joined on: Jan 24, 2006 16:48:18 GMT -5
Posts: 1,283
|
Post by thereklessone on Mar 8, 2010 15:28:08 GMT -5
Can you take a comparison pic of the Mattel Khali with a Jakks RA Kane and Jakks DA Kane? ill try and do the others soon After seeing a comparison of the newer Jakks Kahli and the Mattel Kahli, I have to say that Mattel's, IMO, is better than Jakks'. Thanks for the pics. |
|
DKR
Main Eventer
It's all good...
Joined on: Feb 13, 2008 13:23:53 GMT -5
Posts: 3,916
|
Post by DKR on Mar 8, 2010 20:29:29 GMT -5
That figure looks so good it may persuade me to actually buy a Khali figure.
|
|
