Nitro
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 29, 2006 18:50:40 GMT -5
Posts: 3,839
|
Post by Nitro on Apr 18, 2010 6:39:26 GMT -5
Everytime I watch TNA I always see Kevin Nash jobbing and barely getting any offence in a match and now the same thing is happening to Scott Hall. I find it really stupid that they don't get a single punch in yet they win the match because their opponent got distracted or some other bullcrap.
I know they're heels but even heels don't take that much of an ass kicking
|
|
|
|
Post by No Brokeback on Apr 18, 2010 6:57:48 GMT -5
It's the 'NWO' dude...that's how they've always been.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 30, 2024 13:03:07 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2010 8:18:51 GMT -5
Because they're two 50 year old men. If they owned everyone it'd be ridiculous.
|
|
starpower
Main Eventer
18 Refs and Climbing
Joined on: Dec 14, 2006 21:01:22 GMT -5
Posts: 1,045
|
Post by starpower on Apr 18, 2010 10:03:28 GMT -5
imo they should be the tag champs i mean atleast so me NAMES would have the straps
|
|
|
|
Post by 3Lephant (Naptown Icon) on Apr 18, 2010 11:12:32 GMT -5
I think from a booking perspective, you had to do something to make the dudleyz look strong most of the match because of the Nasty Boys. Nasty Boys beat them like 2 or 3 times in a row and got released so it does make sense to an extent. I just don't know if it had to be THAT much.
Blame it on Russo.
|
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Apr 18, 2010 11:58:52 GMT -5
The question is not why are Hall and Nash jobbers(because they still win a lot of their matches), it's why do they still have jobs in TNA?
|
|
Drdoom
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 10, 2006 12:29:28 GMT -5
Posts: 3,516
|
Post by Drdoom on Apr 18, 2010 13:18:09 GMT -5
Rediculous to get rid of the Nastys before the big Dudleyz pay off. Hopefully this doesn't end the same way
|
|
|
|
Post by Nix Hex on Apr 18, 2010 15:09:47 GMT -5
Because they're two 50 year old men. If they owned everyone it'd be ridiculous. Agreed |
|
nWo_Sentinel
Superstar
Joined on: Feb 21, 2009 20:38:16 GMT -5
Posts: 538
|
Post by nWo_Sentinel on Apr 18, 2010 17:22:13 GMT -5
It's the 'NWO' dude...that's how they've always been. You must not know alot about the nWo..... |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 30, 2024 13:03:07 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2010 18:01:54 GMT -5
I think from a booking perspective, you had to do something to make the dudleyz look strong most of the match because of the Nasty Boys. Nasty Boys beat them like 2 or 3 times in a row and got released so it does make sense to an extent. I just don't know if it had to be THAT much. Blame it on Russo. As often as I can, without resorting to Cornette-like tendencies...  |
|
|
|
Post by specterkev on Apr 18, 2010 18:09:16 GMT -5
It's the 'NWO' dude...that's how they've always been. You must not know alot about the nWo..... damn right the nWo where dominate |
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Apr 18, 2010 23:08:19 GMT -5
because they'll be reasoning their existence as 'putting them over'.
|
|
|
|
Post by cooliceman63 on Apr 18, 2010 23:19:02 GMT -5
The question is not why are Hall and Nash jobbers(because they still win a lot of their matches), it's why do they still have jobs in TNA? Really? Last time I checked they were both established names. I have no idea why all of you IWC idiots think that having established names in TNA is a bad thing. All you do is bitch about Hogan, Hardy, Hall, Nash, and Waltman. Newsflash guys, they are much better for the company than guys like Styles, Generation Me, Shelley and SAbin or any of the X-division because the casual fan knows who they are and can be drawn to Impact when the channel surf. |
|
kjw
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Jul 14, 2005 14:31:52 GMT -5
Posts: 279
|
Post by kjw on Apr 19, 2010 0:15:46 GMT -5
I think that Hall And Oates are way better than Hall And Nash,and Hall and Nash never had the hit records that Hall And Oates had.
|
|
B-Radimus Prime
Main Eventer
R.I.P. Luna :(
Joined on: Jun 20, 2006 21:37:05 GMT -5
Posts: 2,572
|
Post by B-Radimus Prime on Apr 19, 2010 4:35:41 GMT -5
The question is not why are Hall and Nash jobbers(because they still win a lot of their matches), it's why do they still have jobs in TNA? Really? Last time I checked they were both established names. I have no idea why all of you IWC idiots think that having established names in TNA is a bad thing. All you do is bitch about Hogan, Hardy, Hall, Nash, and Waltman. Newsflash guys, they are much better for the company than guys like Styles, Generation Me, Shelley and SAbin or any of the X-division because the casual fan knows who they are and can be drawn to Impact when the channel surf. Yeah, I'm not really seeing what good Hogan, Hardy, Hall, Nash, Waltman, etc. are doing for TNA at all. I've never been a fan of any of these guys, but I understand that they are "draws" and "big names", but they've only turned TNA into more of a joke. They're by no means better for TNA than the young, exciting wrestlers that built the company in the first place. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 30, 2024 13:03:07 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2010 12:00:04 GMT -5
I think it's more Hall than Nash, they're hesitant to really get behind them as a group because of the potential for Hall to not show up like he has before. If he continues to be on his best behavior in a few months that may change.
|
|
