|
|
Post by 3Lephant (Naptown Icon) on May 31, 2010 13:22:56 GMT -5
Disclaimer: Nothing has ever been confirmed either way, this is strictly an opinion thread and not dirt.
Sid is probably one of my all time favorites. He was a monster heel, and also a huge face in 1996. I was just watching a Raw with Sid in 96 vs. Triple H, and the crowd was incredibly hot for him. I know we've come a long way since 14 years ago, but I just feel like if he was given the chance to play the big man in TNA I think it could really draw some money. That, and it would be cool to see him actually do something on a national scale again.
I am aware that it doesn't fit in their current plans or budget, so this is really more hypothetical than anything else.
|
|
|
|
Post by wccwfan4life on May 31, 2010 14:17:03 GMT -5
Sid is one of the better giants to come along in wrestling imo. Not sure what he could really offer today seeing as he wasn't that good in the ring then,and im not sure i wanna see what he's like now.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 13, 2024 17:13:50 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2010 14:21:50 GMT -5
Please no.
The roster is overpacked with people who need to retire as it is.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mac on May 31, 2010 14:24:00 GMT -5
TNA is full of old farts so they do not need him.
|
|
|
|
Post by XHW on May 31, 2010 15:27:16 GMT -5
completely unneccessary, too many guys in TNA as it is
|
|
|
|
Post by AdamBomb on May 31, 2010 16:22:37 GMT -5
Where's that guy with Hogan in his sig... you know, about him hearing bad ideas for TNA?
Yeah, that's about how I feel.
|
|
|
|
Post by 3Lephant (Naptown Icon) on May 31, 2010 17:08:43 GMT -5
Do you guys not know what hypothetical means?
|
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on May 31, 2010 17:11:02 GMT -5
Please no. The roster is overpacked with people who need to retire as it is. Agreed. They dont need Sid....they have Matt Morgan and he is BETTER than Sid. |
|
|
|
Post by jfinnomore on May 31, 2010 17:46:03 GMT -5
Do you guys not know what hypothetical means? yep and even in the hypothetical sense, bringing Sid in would be terrible. |
|
|
|
Post by P@ul on May 31, 2010 17:55:55 GMT -5
As stated, Matt Morgan > Sid Vicious
|
|
|
|
Post by wccwfan4life on May 31, 2010 18:24:07 GMT -5
Please no. The roster is overpacked with people who need to retire as it is. Agreed. They dont need Sid....they have Matt Morgan and he is BETTER than Sid. Morgans ring skills are 1000x better, however he lacks Sid's presence. |
|
|
|
Post by Terrys Wrestling Figures on May 31, 2010 18:25:56 GMT -5
I'm a big Sid fan, but TNA doesn't need him & i sure he doesn't need TNA, would be nice to see him manage in WWE though
|
|
|
|
Post by Nix Hex on May 31, 2010 18:57:28 GMT -5
I always liked Sid..But I just don't know how he would fit in with TNA..I wouldn't mind seeing him show up for a month or 2 though..I enjoyed his last run in WCW but that was a long time ago..Too bad he wasn't able to go to WWE during the Invasion..Does he still wrestle?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 13, 2024 17:13:50 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2010 21:54:10 GMT -5
I hope not, really. The ring's small enough as it is.
|
|
|
|
Post by k5 on May 31, 2010 23:10:37 GMT -5
i'd actually be okay with it, but first i'd like to see some talent cut.
|
|
