Matt Hardy Collector
Superstar
Not a good guy or a bad guy
Joined on: Jun 10, 2010 12:35:15 GMT -5
Posts: 608
|
Post by Matt Hardy Collector on Jun 23, 2010 15:31:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Searching for a Former Clarity on Jun 23, 2010 15:39:24 GMT -5
I did this too actually (found some R3 including Jeff Hardy, DDP, Hogan, Kane, ect...) in my storage. They were also my favorite thing Jakks did except some of them that had the weird back arch to them I hated...
They are pretty good scale with Mattel but now after having the Mattels, The R3s arms seem very off (never saw that very well before Mattel though). They are good head choices to use with Mattel customs too.
|
|
Matt Hardy Collector
Superstar
Not a good guy or a bad guy
Joined on: Jun 10, 2010 12:35:15 GMT -5
Posts: 608
|
Post by Matt Hardy Collector on Jun 23, 2010 15:47:10 GMT -5
When I sized them up and went on Wiki for the heights of the people everyone except RVD is in scale even the custom Bradshaw is in scale. But Hogan and Booker both have that horrible arch in their backs. I know I should have more around the garage but those tubs are buried.
|
|
|
|
Post by Searching for a Former Clarity on Jun 23, 2010 15:52:01 GMT -5
When I sized them up and went on Wiki for the heights of the people everyone except RVD is in scale even the custom Bradshaw is in scale. But Hogan and Booker both have that horrible arch in their backs. I know I should have more around the garage but those tubs are buried. I was gonna ask about that Bradshaw, didnt know it was A custom. That arch is absolutely awful but they were great figures with too short of A run. I always loved the finger articulation (was not on all of them though). |
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Jun 23, 2010 15:56:23 GMT -5
When I sized them up and went on Wiki for the heights of the people everyone except RVD is in scale even the custom Bradshaw is in scale. But Hogan and Booker both have that horrible arch in their backs. I know I should have more around the garage but those tubs are buried. There's is a Hogan in a shirt mold without that torso. Click on pic to enlarge -  |
|
|
|
Post by Searching for a Former Clarity on Jun 23, 2010 16:08:46 GMT -5
Those Kanes were awesome as well as the ABA Undertaker (bottom one). Nice to see some of those pics again. I still have about 50% of the ones I had but I really wish I had the other half that I got rid of.
|
|
|
|
Post by BoJack Hogan on Jun 23, 2010 16:21:30 GMT -5
I brought back Rikishi and Draft Angle, two of my favorite ever figures. Thank you Mattel for allowing the reintegration of R3s.
|
|
Matt Hardy Collector
Superstar
Not a good guy or a bad guy
Joined on: Jun 10, 2010 12:35:15 GMT -5
Posts: 608
|
Post by Matt Hardy Collector on Jun 23, 2010 16:33:07 GMT -5
Jakks really screwed up when they stopped making R3, in my mind they were the most realistic figs Jakks ever made thankfully they can get some new use with Mattels line.
|
|
joesgonnakillu
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 14, 2010 12:43:23 GMT -5
Posts: 1,365
|
Post by joesgonnakillu on Jun 24, 2010 0:42:31 GMT -5
I wish I kept my R3
|
|
|
|
Post by scissorsman on Jun 24, 2010 1:39:00 GMT -5
I love that custom Bradshaw figure!
|
|
|
|
Post by clonetrooper on Jun 24, 2010 4:20:22 GMT -5
yea i've dug my R3's out aswell for my display. My personal favourites are Billy, Chuck and Booker T in his training pants and vest (so tempted to turn it into a Kofi custom)
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Jun 24, 2010 6:49:53 GMT -5
I hated R3 figs but some people actually really liked them..
I only had like 3 and sold them already so that was cool.
|
|
NAЯDO
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 9, 2010 6:48:36 GMT -5
Posts: 2,308
|
Post by NAЯDO on Jun 24, 2010 7:34:27 GMT -5
Glad to see those figures. I like that Kane with the mask only problem is that he's too skinny.
|
|
|
|
Post by alexgg on Jun 24, 2010 8:21:21 GMT -5
R3 Undertaker was like my first figure, i thourght the company had messed up on the "hardcore hampionship" didnt realise for a few years that it never actual had the C on it anyway.  gook figure, but I dont have it now : -/ |
|
tree
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Jun 2, 2010 8:04:50 GMT -5
Posts: 51
|
Post by tree on Jun 24, 2010 9:18:34 GMT -5
This might sound a little stupid, but whats "R3"?
|
|
|
|
Post by Searching for a Former Clarity on Jun 24, 2010 10:16:03 GMT -5
This might sound a little stupid, but whats "R3"? It was A series of figures released by Jakks before they made RA style figures but after and during TTL style figures. They were the first series of figures to be in scale with one another as well I believe. It was A pretty short run of the style of figures but Mattel figures are very much like the R3 figures (much improved though) and are in the same scale as well. |
|
|
|
Post by D.B.K. on Jun 24, 2010 11:37:48 GMT -5
yeah R3 were great figs....  |
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Jun 24, 2010 12:28:35 GMT -5
R3 =
Real scan
Real scale
and I think Real Reaction
|
|
|
|
Post by Gangrel-Brood on Jun 24, 2010 13:39:46 GMT -5
The overuse of the Austin body killed the line's appeal for me.
|
|
