|
Post by Cassa Nova Kid on Nov 1, 2010 17:21:40 GMT -5
European Championship is Back ;D
|
|
Nash
Main Eventer
True join date = May 2006
Joined on: Apr 8, 2010 14:48:43 GMT -5
Posts: 1,695
|
Post by Nash on Nov 1, 2010 17:33:36 GMT -5
Yay/Nay
World Titles: Nay Tag Titles: Yay (know it happened already, but still) U.S./I.C.: Nay Womens/Divas: Yay
So pretty much, what they did so far is enough and should just keep things as is.
|
|
|
Post by Randolph J 'Hurricane' Spencer on Nov 1, 2010 17:49:59 GMT -5
the us title only dates back to 2003 regardless of what wwe says. they need 1 world champion, 1 ic champion and 1 set of tag champs, then they can always add another mid card belt to the list like a european belt or tv belt. bringing the cruiserweight belt back would also be a good thing.
|
|
|
Post by Nick the Quick on Nov 1, 2010 19:12:12 GMT -5
100% against unifying anymore titles, there's no reason for it. Too many guys already aren't getting World title pushes, unifying them would only make that worse. They only had one world title when the brand extension started, and it didn't work out well. Why would anything be different now?
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Nov 1, 2010 19:14:03 GMT -5
100% NAY! them. I didn't care with the tag belts but I hated it with the diva's title and women's title. I will absolutely be mad if they unify the IC and US belt and then the world titles. A lot of good people will have nothing to do and the same people will be pushed to the limited amount of belts so I don't like this at all!
|
|
|
Post by wyleecyotee on Nov 1, 2010 19:19:14 GMT -5
Wouldn't mind them unifying the World Titles as it would bring back that one big Championship for all the "superstars" to work towards.
Keep the US and IC as brand exclusive titles.
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Nov 1, 2010 19:19:53 GMT -5
I'm with the "Unify everything except US/IC" camp.
I would hope that if they unified the big titles, they keep the World title as the belt. It has the WWE logo, plus all the verbose wording. Thus making it the "WWE World Heavyweight Wrestling Championship."
|
|
|
Post by wyleecyotee on Nov 1, 2010 19:23:38 GMT -5
I'm with the "Unify everything except US/IC" camp. I would hope that if they unified the big titles, they keep the World title as the belt. It has the WWE logo, plus all the verbose wording. Thus making it the "WWE World Heavyweight Wrestling Championship." ???In the WWE?
|
|
|
Post by JDSFullmetal on Nov 1, 2010 19:25:07 GMT -5
No they are fine as they are, but they do need to make the titles more prestiges. This.
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Nov 1, 2010 19:29:52 GMT -5
I'm with the "Unify everything except US/IC" camp. I would hope that if they unified the big titles, they keep the World title as the belt. It has the WWE logo, plus all the verbose wording. Thus making it the "WWE World Heavyweight Wrestling Championship." ???In the WWE? Hey, I didn't engrave the belt.
|
|
|
Post by njpunk on Nov 1, 2010 19:32:58 GMT -5
Personally, I think every belt but the world titles should be unified, with the world titles becoming the "WWE Raw" and "WWE Smackdown" World Heavyweight Championships.
|
|
|
Post by wyleecyotee on Nov 1, 2010 19:35:29 GMT -5
???In the WWE? Hey, I didn't engrave the belt. If they where to unify them I would guess they would make a new belt as it would sell well in repicas and such.
|
|
|
Post by gordon on Nov 1, 2010 19:36:12 GMT -5
Definitely not.
Keep the World titles and the US/IC title seperate PLEASE!
|
|
|
Post by LeighD on Nov 1, 2010 19:36:52 GMT -5
I like the idea. Narrow the titles to:
- WWE World Heavyweight - Intercontinental - TV - Tag Team - Women's
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Nov 2, 2010 10:34:47 GMT -5
No they are fine as they are, but they do need to make the titles more prestiges. This. Yea well ; maybe you don't remember or never seen when with the WWE had 4 titles only, they were prestiges. In order to make it prestiges, you have to unify the both titles. Because you can't have two at being at the Main Event at WM. The one chance should be at the Royal Rumble.
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Nov 2, 2010 12:17:13 GMT -5
No. I like their being 4 titles. There are enough superstars on each show to warrant that.
The Tag Titles needed to be unified because there are hardly any real tag teams now.
Both shows need strong main events, having those main event superstars fighting for SOMETHING is good. If not, you mine as well screw the roster split, screw the draft, and have everyone all over the place....it'd be too confusing and too much. The writers can barely book good storylines on ONE show...let them try 2. Plus with 1 guy as champ it would be so much of the same crap on one show.
|
|
|
Post by DMO™ on Nov 2, 2010 13:15:45 GMT -5
I'm for it, but I have a feeling there is going to be A LOT more multi man matches which are good but as long as they have good stories behind them.
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Nov 2, 2010 14:08:49 GMT -5
And the brands don't even mean anything anymore. Jack Swagger cashed in his MITB contract in a roster he wasn't even in.
|
|
|
Post by DMO™ on Nov 2, 2010 14:29:47 GMT -5
And the brands don't even mean anything anymore. Jack Swagger cashed in his MITB contract in a roster he wasn't even in. ...... The wrestlemania MITB briefcase contract states that he could cash it in on ANY current WWE champion so.......
|
|
|
Post by Lk™ on Nov 2, 2010 15:58:51 GMT -5
yes, but i think there should be another belt just below the ic/us title. i just wanna see danielson dominate both rosters.
|
|