*Ricky Spanish*
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 16, 2008 23:44:21 GMT -5
Posts: 4,093
|
Post by *Ricky Spanish* on Nov 1, 2010 5:03:47 GMT -5
Okay lots of talk of the 4 main titles to have a unification. I for one am dead set against this we tried it when bishoff took them all away and left one for hunter.It just doesnt work IMO half the glory of wrestling soap opera we watch is seeing our fav star age and grow into main eventers.I think it was the right move with the tag titles and womens but not ic/us or world/wwe.We need those so we can have matchs of guys giving it their all to become the A guy IE WWE champ or US champ pretty much what is on Raw at that current time lol
|
|
|
|
Post by machoking on Nov 1, 2010 6:17:14 GMT -5
100% yay.
I know a lot of talent will end up overlooked, but it'll lead to an overall stronger main event & mid card scene. Two championships for each division are no longer needed as people show up on RAW/SD whenever it seems to suit them. Besides, Champion vs. Champion at WM could be a huge draw.
|
|
CMD
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Joined on: Apr 16, 2003 0:08:57 GMT -5
Posts: 5,666
|
Post by CMD on Nov 1, 2010 6:46:34 GMT -5
I generally support unifying titles except in the case of the IC Title and US Title. Both of those titles have a rich lineage to them (although I could see them unifying them and favoring the IC title simply because they created it), and could stand on their own brands, with the guys holding them and contending for them as the guys from each brand who are ultimately gunning for the very top prize.
-CMD
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Nov 1, 2010 7:19:55 GMT -5
I would love it if they went back to just having the WWE, IC, Women's/Diva's, and World Tag Team Championships.
|
|
|
|
Post by cjskittles4 on Nov 1, 2010 7:45:24 GMT -5
yay
but I'd like them to keep the US and IC titles separately because it would be like the IC and Euro titles from back in the day, but with the IC being number 2 and US being number 3
|
|
|
|
Post by pedigree619 on Nov 1, 2010 7:54:48 GMT -5
I think we should have a world title (the sacagawea), tag titles (pennies), the IC title(quarter), the US title(dime) and the Divas champonship(nickel).
|
|
|
|
Post by TheChamp420 on Nov 1, 2010 8:35:53 GMT -5
Nay, there are already too many maineventers that are in the mix, imagine all of em going for 1 title?
|
|
|
|
Post by JTG on Nov 1, 2010 8:43:58 GMT -5
On the surface it sounds good that there would only be one World Championship, however like said above there are just too many maineventers right now and I could foresee there being a problem with certain guys not getting a break in that division. Hell even the mid-card division would suffer. At least they could add something like a TV Title or something for some other mid-carders or like others have said just keep the IC and US titles.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nick Papagiorgio on Nov 1, 2010 10:57:44 GMT -5
HELL NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
|
|
Bullgod
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 8, 2006 14:22:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,014
|
Post by Bullgod on Nov 1, 2010 11:15:40 GMT -5
Im 100% down with it, I think it would give the main event more status.
I say ditch the Intercontinental and U.S, as much as I like them for traditional purpose I feel WWE would benefit more with a Raw champion and a Smackdown champion as there secondary championships.
|
|
|
|
Post by McBlake on Nov 1, 2010 11:22:46 GMT -5
No. 2 mid card titles are a MUST imo. One for each brand, really unfair on some guys that need the mid card title to elevate their careers.
Having 5 titles wouldn't be bad imo, although I'd prefer to have a major title on each brand also.
|
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Nov 1, 2010 11:52:45 GMT -5
YAY.
I think it would be great for one thing. And thats for the Royal Rumble match. Because then they'll be only one chance to have a Main Event spot at WM. And that would make it very valuable.
|
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Nov 1, 2010 11:55:23 GMT -5
No. 2 mid card titles are a MUST imo. One for each brand, really unfair on some guys that need the mid card title to elevate their careers. Having 5 titles wouldn't be bad imo, although I'd prefer to have a major title on each brand also. Then you can use the I.C Champion as that second major title.The I.C Champion back in the days was that second major title. And it has a lot of history behind it. |
|
|
|
Post by moocow on Nov 1, 2010 12:12:30 GMT -5
No because there are too many wrestlers on the roster nowadays.
|
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Nov 1, 2010 12:18:07 GMT -5
No because there are too many wrestlers on the roster nowadays. But does everybody have to win ? You only win the WWE C/WHC , if you're great. And if your favorite mid card wrestler doesn't , he doesn't win. Rowdy Pipper never won. Jake the Snake never won. You can name plenty who've haven't. |
|
cyantist
Superstar
Joined on: May 9, 2010 6:47:56 GMT -5
Posts: 950
|
Post by cyantist on Nov 1, 2010 14:18:19 GMT -5
I think the brands need unifying again. 4 shows before a PPV really isnt enough time to build a fued (which it sometimes is used as) Compare that to 2001 and earlier. 8 Shows a month with the guys competing on both allowed to get all the twists and turns out without it being rushed
|
|
henryelliott
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Oct 24, 2010 12:09:11 GMT -5
Posts: 158
|
Post by henryelliott on Nov 1, 2010 14:34:46 GMT -5
I vote yay, how much better was it when the focus was on one heavyweight title, a midcarders (intercontinental) and one set of tag straps
|
|
|
|
Post by alexgg on Nov 1, 2010 15:08:58 GMT -5
No they are fine as they are, but they do need to make the titles more prestiges.
|
|
TheEdgeHead41
Main Eventer
#1 Mysterio Fan!
Joined on: Dec 2, 2009 15:20:46 GMT -5
Posts: 2,339
|
Post by TheEdgeHead41 on Nov 1, 2010 16:31:33 GMT -5
IC/US Yay. WWE/WHC Nay.
|
|
Dekabreak
Main Eventer
lel
Joined on: Dec 29, 2005 17:13:19 GMT -5
Posts: 3,682
|
Post by Dekabreak on Nov 1, 2010 17:18:48 GMT -5
I'd like to see a Drew McIntyre/European Championship storyline.
|
|
