|
|
Post by BCizzle on Jan 30, 2011 22:53:22 GMT -5
They all got screwed out of the Rumble this year. Why did the WWE announce them at all? To break the hearts of all the WGN WWE Superstars fans?
|
|
|
|
Post by slugger123 on Jan 30, 2011 22:53:50 GMT -5
Husky was in.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenny Powers on Jan 30, 2011 22:54:46 GMT -5
What the hell? Husky played a huge role in the Royal Rumble.
|
|
|
|
Post by BCizzle on Jan 30, 2011 22:59:39 GMT -5
Whoops, my bad. The first 3, then. (I didn't watch the PPV, I just read the report online.)
|
|
MikeMillenium
Main Eventer
I LOVE THE WWE AND EVERYTHING ABOUT IT
Joined on: Jul 21, 2010 13:45:54 GMT -5
Posts: 1,622
|
Post by MikeMillenium on Jan 30, 2011 23:01:27 GMT -5
To be honest, the WWE has made me not care too much about them not being in. At least we didn't get those entrants where the crowd was completely silent. I mean, they popped for Zack Ryder!
That being said, Superstars is probably my second favorite show. I miss more Smackdowns than Superstars.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eat Defeat. on Jan 30, 2011 23:01:29 GMT -5
I would have preferred Darren or DH to the useless Tyler Reks.
|
|
|
|
Post by cattlemutilation on Jan 30, 2011 23:08:03 GMT -5
I would have preferred Darren to Reks, Ryder, Chavo, and Santino at the minimum....
|
|
|
|
Post by muccguy88 on Jan 30, 2011 23:08:27 GMT -5
young, primo, and dh should have been in rather than hornswoggle, orton, and ziggler. im a fan of orton and ziggler but i always feel if ur wrestling for the title at the royal rumble u shouldnt be in the royal rumble match. that should be the trade off of being #1 contender.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Jan 30, 2011 23:23:16 GMT -5
I would have preferred Darren or DH to the useless Tyler Reks. Again his name is shortened to T.Reks, he's a bad ass who doesn't think planes should be taking off. |
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Jan 30, 2011 23:25:28 GMT -5
3 spots were wasted for Hornswoggle, Orton and Ziggler, although in Ziggler's case, you can say Vicki gave him that spot.
|
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jan 30, 2011 23:28:23 GMT -5
There was enough wasted space as it was, no need for more.
The 40 man idea was overkill, they could have easily taken ten guys away and no one would have noticed a shred of difference. The roster pool is deep right now, but most of those guys were used so poorly in the match that it would have been better off just leaving them out of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lk™ on Jan 30, 2011 23:30:44 GMT -5
they were replaced by riley, orton and ziggler. pointless really
|
|
