|
|
Post by ~*Young $ Money*~ on Feb 1, 2011 19:48:08 GMT -5
OK now if Sting and Taker do square off at WM most likely it will be Sting's only WM appearance. Alot of people i'm sure won't want Sting to lose but people don't want the streak to end. What side are you on?
|
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Feb 1, 2011 19:50:45 GMT -5
IF Sting signs a contract, he still wont fight Taker at this Mania. The Streak will never be broken and Sting wont job as his first and possibly last Mania.
|
|
TheEvilDoink1987
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 22, 2010 21:37:52 GMT -5
Posts: 2,634
|
Post by TheEvilDoink1987 on Feb 1, 2011 20:01:24 GMT -5
If all this turns out to be Sting I'm pretty certain he will do a spot where he actually helps the Undertaker win at WM. No match, just the HoF and a memorable WM moment with Taker.
I'd like that.
|
|
Mr. K.O
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 24, 2010 19:04:14 GMT -5
Posts: 4,094
|
Post by Mr. K.O on Feb 1, 2011 20:08:30 GMT -5
If all this turns out to be Sting I'm pretty certain he will do a spot where he actually helps the Undertaker win at WM. No match, just the HoF and a memorable WM moment with Taker. I'd like that. Me too. I bet a lot of us just want to see him in a WWE for the first time in his amazing career. Even if it was just for ONE night, people would still be happy. |
|
|
|
Post by slugger123 on Feb 1, 2011 21:04:03 GMT -5
They would be absolutely stupid to make Undertaker, the guy who has been with the WWE for 20 years with no problems, no leaving, and being the face of the business losing to a guy that has never worked for the WWE, and in fact worked for all it's competitors.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dangerous Donovan on Feb 1, 2011 22:41:20 GMT -5
As much as I would like to see it, I don't see this match happening. Like stated above, Taker can't have the streak broken and they wouldn't have Sting come in just to job to him.
However, to answer your question, I would have to pull for Sting if this match ever went down.
|
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Feb 1, 2011 22:42:34 GMT -5
IF Sting signs a contract, he still wont fight Taker at this Mania. The Streak will never be broken and Sting wont job as his first and possibly last Mania. Exactly! |
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Feb 1, 2011 23:03:00 GMT -5
Sting vs Undertaker at Wrestlemania 27 with one month of buildup is a lose-lose situation
|
|
|
|
Post by myaddow on Feb 1, 2011 23:21:59 GMT -5
If all this turns out to be Sting I'm pretty certain he will do a spot where he actually helps the Undertaker win at WM. No match, just the HoF and a memorable WM moment with Taker. I'd like that. Me too. I bet a lot of us just want to see him in a WWE for the first time in his amazing career. Even if it was just for ONE night, people would still be happy. I would be happy with that. |
|
|
|
Post by ToastMaster General on Feb 2, 2011 0:20:03 GMT -5
I'd want Taker to win as much I love Sting and all, but the streak must never end.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Feb 2, 2011 0:31:30 GMT -5
1 million % Taker.
If he loses at WM some bs happened..
The match would still be good but Taker wins at Mania and if they want do a rematch at a different PPV.
|
|
jonmc999
Superstar
Everybody Has their Price Everybodys going to Pay as the MILLION DOLLAR PRINCESS always gets Her WAY
Joined on: Jun 27, 2007 1:50:52 GMT -5
Posts: 524
|
Post by jonmc999 on Feb 2, 2011 2:05:56 GMT -5
I haven't worked out every minor detail like some people on here bit how about this for an idea,
Sting is based on tge film The Crow and in that film he is resurrected to avenge the death of someone, so how about Sting is the one who brings the Undertaker back so he can take revenge on Nexas and The Corre, first could be Barrett at Wrestlemania then at each PPV could be another member, could involve Tag match with Sting then the final person to get revenge on would be Kane at Wrestlemania28 which of course Undertaker would win but at a cost. Sting could appear on the ramp at wrestlemania and signal for the Druids to appear and collect the Taker to return him to his resting place as he completed his mission, never to be seen again until he is inducted into HOF the following year.
|
|
|
|
Post by cjskittles4 on Feb 2, 2011 6:22:34 GMT -5
Well, I wouldn't be pissed if Taker lost at Mania to Sting. Hell, the fact that Sting would be in a WWE ring would make me feel good enough. Screw the streak, it's high enough  |
|
|
|
Post by The Assassin on Feb 2, 2011 7:26:44 GMT -5
if Sting comes to WWE, he needs to win his matches. having him lose would just be ridiculous. but equally i can't see WWE or the fans accepting taker losing at WM, so the answer is, sting should not face taker at WM.
|
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Feb 2, 2011 11:26:58 GMT -5
Taker. The streak isn't ever ending. I have no desire to see Sting job to Taker but I am pretty sure I don't ever have to worry about it.
|
|
AV1
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 15, 2008 9:04:59 GMT -5
Posts: 2,870
|
Post by AV1 on Feb 2, 2011 12:16:21 GMT -5
undertaker and i would be very annoyed if sting won
why would wwe make the face of there company to lose at wrestlemania for the first time to someone who has competed for wwe's rivals and said he wouldn't go as he doesn't want his character ruined etc
plus i dont see what they have in common but the both wear similar attires
|
|
