mfunston20
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Oct 3, 2009 18:19:20 GMT -5
Posts: 301
|
Post by mfunston20 on Mar 6, 2011 3:06:15 GMT -5
After The Undertaker is done with wrestling, who do you think is the next wrestler to have a streak like The Undertaker if anyone? Or do you think he should be the only one to have a streak like that to keep meaning of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by ~*Young $ Money*~ on Mar 6, 2011 3:08:46 GMT -5
WWE can't make plans for a month down the road right now so i highly doubt someone will have a streak like Taker for a while.
|
|
|
|
Post by BØRNS on Mar 6, 2011 3:20:08 GMT -5
I think if Cena won WM 24, he would be the next. They totally blew it, otherwise he'd be 8-0 at WM 27.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 14, 2024 19:24:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2011 3:22:15 GMT -5
the miz. he's only 17 wins away from tying taker  |
|
|
|
Post by Himmy! on Mar 6, 2011 10:41:31 GMT -5
Don't think there'll be another one like it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 14, 2024 19:24:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2011 10:47:52 GMT -5
there should never be another streak like this.
|
|
|
|
Post by aagance0213 on Mar 6, 2011 10:53:22 GMT -5
I don't there should be anymore streaks. Its sad seeing HHH and Taker go, but, in a way, i kinda like it because it puts for pressure on the WWE to have a good WM every year
|
|
|
|
Post by Irish Wrestling Entertainment on Mar 6, 2011 10:53:42 GMT -5
Like has been stated, there should never be another streak. Unless Undertaker loses to a Wrestlemania 'newcomer' and asks him to carry on the streak when he leaves - but I know a lot of people including myself would be against the principal of this idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Wrestling on Mar 6, 2011 12:33:50 GMT -5
I wouldn't mind something like 9-0 at most, but without going every year with "Who will break the streak?"
|
|
|
|
Post by aagance0213 on Mar 6, 2011 12:50:03 GMT -5
I wouldn't mind something like 9-0 at most, but without going every year with "Who will break the streak?" I can see that. And the only two wrestlers do this, is Del Rio and Miz. Or maybe Daniel Bryan. |
|
codebreaker22
Superstar
Best In The World
Joined on: Oct 29, 2010 18:02:55 GMT -5
Posts: 604
|
Post by codebreaker22 on Mar 6, 2011 13:34:44 GMT -5
Don't think there'll be another one like it. Yeah, can't see it happening. |
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Mar 6, 2011 13:40:12 GMT -5
the miz. he's only 17 wins away from tying taker Except he is 1-1 at Wrestlemania |
|
|
|
Post by mrrocky619 on Mar 6, 2011 13:52:00 GMT -5
they BETTER, and i mean BETTER NOT have anyone even come close to tieing the streak. if they do i will come down there, shine up takers streak real nice, and shove it up their candy ass's! but srsly, they should not have anyone even come close to the streak.
|
|
Mr. K.O
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 24, 2010 19:04:14 GMT -5
Posts: 4,094
|
Post by Mr. K.O on Mar 6, 2011 13:59:41 GMT -5
I remember that when they wanted to do The Undertaker vs Edge Match, they wanted to make it Streak vs Streak instead of Streak vs Title, but it all changed when Edge lost at WM23. But to answer your question, I don't think anyone else should have a Streak. I feel that if a superstar is about to retire or leave, they should have an accolade that made them unique. Ex. Duggan won the 1st Rumble, Flair is a 16 time World Champion, HBK (a lot), and Taker has his Streak.
|
|
Callum1993
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 21, 2010 13:30:03 GMT -5
Posts: 2,268
|
Post by Callum1993 on Mar 6, 2011 14:11:06 GMT -5
the miz. he's only 17 wins away from tying taker Except he is 1-1 at Wrestlemania The tag match against Primo and Carlito was a dark match so I dont think it counts |
|
|
|
Post by 1992 on Mar 6, 2011 14:14:58 GMT -5
Except he is 1-1 at Wrestlemania The tag match against Primo and Carlito was a dark match so I dont think it counts Honestly that would be to much of a controversy to build around. Like if A-Train and Big Show went over Taker but it was a dark match so it doesn't count. It would still be recognized by EVERYONE as a Wrestlemania loss, because he did in fact lose...at Wrestlemania. |
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Mar 6, 2011 14:17:46 GMT -5
The tag match against Primo and Carlito was a dark match so I dont think it counts Honestly that would be to much of a controversy to build around. Like if A-Train and Big Show went over Taker but it was a dark match so it doesn't count. It would still be recognized by EVERYONE as a Wrestlemania loss, because he did in fact lose...at Wrestlemania. No, he lost... BEFORE WrestleMania  Good Lord, they even said themselves he is 1-0 at Mania. Dark matches do not count as taking place at WrestleMania, because WrestleMania does not begin until the PPV starts. Are we seriously discussing this? -_- |
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Mar 6, 2011 15:06:08 GMT -5
Honestly that would be to much of a controversy to build around. Like if A-Train and Big Show went over Taker but it was a dark match so it doesn't count. It would still be recognized by EVERYONE as a Wrestlemania loss, because he did in fact lose...at Wrestlemania. No, he lost... BEFORE WrestleMania Good Lord, they even said themselves he is 1-0 at Mania. Dark matches do not count as taking place at WrestleMania, because WrestleMania does not begin until the PPV starts. Are we seriously discussing this? -_- But the sign on the marquis still says Wrestlemania, not Sunday Night Heat, Free For All or anything like that. |
|
|
|
Post by Lewscher on Mar 6, 2011 15:50:37 GMT -5
WWF/E Has Undertaker WCW Had Goldberg No more need for a streak in pro-wrestling. The 'E' just ran takers for longer and many years after Goldberg as the 'E' made an anual streak and WCW ran a weekly streak   |
|
|
|
Post by jfinnomore on Mar 6, 2011 16:26:24 GMT -5
no one and its not really needed.
|
|
