|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Apr 18, 2011 13:51:40 GMT -5
At Wrestlemania 28 if Triple H and Undertaker had another huge epic encounter, both throwing everything at one another and in the end Triple H and Undertaker do the spot where they're both out-cold and they each drape the arm over the other one allowing the ref to count to three. Technically Triple H would have beat The Undertaker and ended the streak but yet The Undertaker still pinned Triple H making the streak 20-0... or 19-0-1. Both men walk off into the sunset believing they both accomplished what they set out to do...
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Apr 18, 2011 13:53:09 GMT -5
I think it'd be stupid to end the match that way.
|
|
|
|
Post by v/\v on Apr 18, 2011 13:56:11 GMT -5
Very stupid. I don't mind it going either way, as long as it feels right in the moment. This year was good setup to make Takerstreak look reasonably beatable.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 5:53:01 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2011 13:56:17 GMT -5
I think it'd be stupid to end the match that way. |
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Apr 18, 2011 13:59:14 GMT -5
I would feel really dissapointed and cheated.
The "Streak" isn't something that was ever planned, he's beaten a decent amount of nobodies or washed up people along the way, and nobody cared about "the Streak" or even called it "The Streak" until like Wrestlemania 22.....but the fact is that either by fluke or by design it's gotten to 19-0 so there is NO reason why it shouldn't get to 20-0.
|
|
Infinite
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 27, 2009 13:49:36 GMT -5
Posts: 2,608
|
Post by Infinite on Apr 18, 2011 13:59:39 GMT -5
At this point, I really think it should just end 20-0, clean as a whistle.
|
|
|
|
Post by "The Visionary" Eldniw on Apr 18, 2011 13:59:53 GMT -5
Hmm....I honestly think, if Undertaker takes off until WM28, it may be over at 19-1. The -1 will be the thing to make him realize that he can't go anymore, and he'll walk away before he spends the rest of his life in a wheelchair. And before he turns into a bitter, self-centered, delusional, senile old man like Billy Graham.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Apr 18, 2011 14:06:53 GMT -5
I would feel really dissapointed and cheated. The "Streak" isn't something that was ever planned, he's beaten a decent amount of nobodies or washed up people along the way, and nobody cared about "the Streak" or even called it "The Streak" until like Wrestlemania 22.....but the fact is that either by fluke or by design it's gotten to 19-0 so there is NO reason why it shouldn't get to 20-0. WM 18. They were mentioning it during his match with Flair. |
|
thespecialone
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 8, 2009 17:48:05 GMT -5
Posts: 2,762
|
Post by thespecialone on Apr 18, 2011 14:10:59 GMT -5
On this road to WM, HHH said that the streak is what "feeds" him or something like that...
It would actually be cool to see him lose the streak and then...puff...turn into dust.
|
|
|
|
Post by ahunter8056 on Apr 18, 2011 14:41:30 GMT -5
No thanks. Already seen HHH VS Taker twice. People should only get one shot.
|
|
|
|
Post by missy12931 on Apr 18, 2011 14:59:08 GMT -5
lets get undertaker a new opponent, not the same 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Apr 18, 2011 15:05:39 GMT -5
lets get undertaker a new opponent, not the same 1 Not a single other person in the WWE is a credible threat to the streak outside of Triple H... Maybe Edge could've been but... seriously who would you put in there that can be built as a credible threat to the streak? |
|
|
|
Post by The-Rock on Apr 18, 2011 15:06:33 GMT -5
No thanks. Already seen HHH VS Taker twice. People should only get one shot. ya, I didn't event want to see him fight HHH this year. I would have much preferred Sheamus, Jack Swagger, Alberto Del Rio, or any number of people. I always wanted to see Umaga face Undertaker at wrestlemania. |
|
|
|
Post by D.B.K. on Apr 18, 2011 15:13:20 GMT -5
No thanks. Already seen HHH VS Taker twice. People should only get one shot. this |
|
thestongguy
Main Eventer
Refs: 11
Joined on: Aug 15, 2004 22:17:02 GMT -5
Posts: 1,063
|
Post by thestongguy on Apr 18, 2011 15:13:48 GMT -5
undertaker will make it to 20-0. and honestly, if he ever was to lose the streak it would have to be at 20-1, and to someone of takers choosing.
|
|
|
|
Post by painfulregret on Apr 18, 2011 15:32:32 GMT -5
lets get undertaker a new opponent, not the same 1 Not a single other person in the WWE is a credible threat to the streak outside of Triple H... Maybe Edge could've been but... seriously who would you put in there that can be built as a credible threat to the streak? Chris Jericho? I would of said Cena, but his match with Rock rules out that possibility. |
|
|
|
Post by orton1994 on Apr 18, 2011 16:30:07 GMT -5
Yoshi Tatsu will turn heel and take out the Undertaker
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 5:53:01 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2011 16:31:01 GMT -5
From what I've read and heard about Taker, he's the kind of guy who would like to hand over the streak to somebody worthy and give back to the business.
Think of it this way, if Taker retires at 20-0 and takes the streak with him to his ranch in Texas, then WWE has nothing but a legacy. BUT, if they use the streak as, say, a way for Cena to turn heel and mercilessly beat Taker before ending the streak with an Attitude Adjustment - thus leading to a ton of attention, publicity, ratings and merchandise for a new, cold hearted Cena (hypothetically) - then you can bet WWE will go for that.
And as a guy who always puts the business first, so would Taker.
There's a belief amongst the old timers that it's better to go out on your back, and I think Taker will adhere to this and pass the torch to someone.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Apr 18, 2011 16:47:12 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure the only reason the Undertaker hasn't even retired yet is because he wants to get that 20-0. I'm certain whoever he faces, he will come out on top. It will pretty much be the most predictable WM match ever. Everyone knows Taker is going to win, and to think otherwise would just be ludicrous.
|
|
|
|
Post by Scott! on Apr 18, 2011 16:55:05 GMT -5
yeah  wait, wait .. no ! |
|
