WWE4Life!
Superstar
Joined on: Jan 14, 2003 9:57:51 GMT -5
Posts: 600
|
Post by WWE4Life! on Apr 18, 2011 17:00:04 GMT -5
I would be hugely disappointed if that match ended in any kind of draw. There should never be a draw at WM. As for Taker vs HHH happening again, I'm fine with that. It seems like it could go that way considering how close HHH came this year, especially since Taker didn't walk out. If someone is going to end the streak, it needs to be definitive. I tend to lean toward the pass the torch way of thinking. If that's the case, then I think the one to go with would be CM Punk. He's the most credible of the rising stars that hasn't really cemented a legacy yet. A strong build over the next year and Punk could be a very believable threat to the streak.
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Apr 18, 2011 17:23:36 GMT -5
If HHH couldnt beat him at this WM with what he did. How can anybody beat him now?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 11:33:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2011 17:27:04 GMT -5
Sheamus should face The Undertaker next year.
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Apr 18, 2011 17:38:44 GMT -5
I think HHH should give him the fingerpoke of doom, and end the streak that way.
|
|
|
Post by The Mac on Apr 18, 2011 17:53:02 GMT -5
If that happened most people would feel ripped off
|
|
|
Post by jfinnomore on Apr 18, 2011 18:35:15 GMT -5
lets get undertaker a new opponent, not the same 1 Not a single other person in the WWE is a credible threat to the streak outside of Triple H... Maybe Edge could've been but... seriously who would you put in there that can be built as a credible threat to the streak? Punk Orton Christian there is plenty of guys who if built properly could look like threat however we all know Taker will retain so really doesn't matter if they are credible or not.
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Wrestling on Apr 18, 2011 18:43:08 GMT -5
If HHH couldnt beat him at this WM with what he did. How can anybody beat him now? That's the great thing about someone ending it. If a new star does, they will get extremely over. Shawn Michaels, Batista, Triple H, Kane, Edge, and many others couldn't do it but he was able to. On topic: The streak should always have a clear winner, even if Undertaker loses.
|
|
thekaniac
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Apr 10, 2011 8:54:58 GMT -5
Posts: 262
|
Post by thekaniac on Apr 18, 2011 18:48:12 GMT -5
Not on a biased view but Kane should be the only person to end the streak......okay maybe it was a bit biased.
|
|
GCYUM
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 2, 2004 15:12:45 GMT -5
Posts: 1,870
|
Post by GCYUM on Apr 18, 2011 21:47:45 GMT -5
No thanks. Already seen HHH VS Taker twice. People should only get one shot. ya, I didn't event want to see him fight HHH this year. I would have much preferred Sheamus, Jack Swagger, Alberto Del Rio, or any number of people. I always wanted to see Umaga face Undertaker at wrestlemania. I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but Umaga died a while ago.
|
|
|
Post by ozzytorezwrestling on Apr 18, 2011 21:55:08 GMT -5
There are a couple talents who can be made as a threat to the streak like Punk, Sheamus, Wade, even Jericho. I'm fine with one of those guys going against Taker.
|
|
|
Post by kazoosandstreamers on Apr 19, 2011 1:10:27 GMT -5
New opponent, please.
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Apr 19, 2011 1:11:48 GMT -5
I would HATE that.
So I really hope the wwe doesn't think they can do that.
|
|
threehgame
Main Eventer
Beyond Bored By You and Your Wrestling
Joined on: Sept 22, 2008 19:09:45 GMT -5
Posts: 2,399
|
Post by threehgame on Apr 19, 2011 1:52:11 GMT -5
At this point I don't care anymore. The last time I felt the streak was in anyway in trouble was WM24. Unless someone young and dangerous (Punk, Barret or Sheamus) takes on Taker next year he will roll to 20-0.
|
|
|
Post by DgenerationX092 on Apr 19, 2011 4:09:09 GMT -5
From what I've read and heard about Taker, he's the kind of guy who would like to hand over the streak to somebody worthy and give back to the business. Think of it this way, if Taker retires at 20-0 and takes the streak with him to his ranch in Texas, then WWE has nothing but a legacy. BUT, if they use the streak as, say, a way for Cena to turn heel and mercilessly beat Taker before ending the streak with an Attitude Adjustment - thus leading to a ton of attention, publicity, ratings and merchandise for a new, cold hearted Cena (hypothetically) - then you can bet WWE will go for that. And as a guy who always puts the business first, so would Taker. There's a belief amongst the old timers that it's better to go out on your back, and I think Taker will adhere to this and pass the torch to someone. Cena's facing Rock, so he's out. While I've tried looking at that point of view for a while "Hey, he's going to lose to accelerrate a new superstar", but honestly, its not going to happen. and heres why: Ever since Cena and Orton, there has not been a superstar WWE can wholeheartedly rely on to carry that torch you speak of. 95% (IMO) of the roster has since been misses.. not hits. MVP and Carlito were compared to The Rock and were believed to have the brightest future. Theyre fired. Kennedy.. Fired. Swagger, Dibiase, Sheamus, Morrison..... Miss, miss, miss, miss. Having any young Superstar on the roster beat Undertaker for the benefit of launching their career is too big of a gamble. If they fail to live up to expectations, that then means Undertaker was irreversibly robbed of his greatest feat by someone who will instantly go down as one of the worst Superstars in history, and tarnishing the legacy of one of the greatest Superstars in history. It sounds harsh, but if you can't benefit from what would be the greatest push in Wrestling's history, then you will become the scum of Wrestling's history.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 11:33:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2011 4:16:24 GMT -5
From what I've read and heard about Taker, he's the kind of guy who would like to hand over the streak to somebody worthy and give back to the business. Think of it this way, if Taker retires at 20-0 and takes the streak with him to his ranch in Texas, then WWE has nothing but a legacy. BUT, if they use the streak as, say, a way for Cena to turn heel and mercilessly beat Taker before ending the streak with an Attitude Adjustment - thus leading to a ton of attention, publicity, ratings and merchandise for a new, cold hearted Cena (hypothetically) - then you can bet WWE will go for that. And as a guy who always puts the business first, so would Taker. There's a belief amongst the old timers that it's better to go out on your back, and I think Taker will adhere to this and pass the torch to someone. Cena's facing Rock, so he's out. While I've tried looking at that point of view for a while "Hey, he's going to lose to accelerrate a new superstar", but honestly, its not going to happen. and heres why: Ever since Cena and Orton, there has not been a superstar WWE can wholeheartedly rely on to carry that torch you speak of. 95% (IMO) of the roster has since been misses.. not hits. MVP and Carlito were compared to The Rock and were believed to have the brightest future. Theyre fired. Kennedy.. Fired. Swagger, Dibiase, Sheamus, Morrison..... Miss, miss, miss, miss. Having any young Superstar on the roster beat Undertaker for the benefit of launching their career is too big of a gamble. If they fail to live up to expectations, that then means Undertaker was irreversibly robbed of his greatest feat by someone who will instantly go down as one of the worst Superstars in history, and tarnishing the legacy of one of the greatest Superstars in history. It sounds harsh, but if you can't benefit from what would be the greatest push in Wrestling's history, then you will become the scum of Wrestling's history. Also, Cena said he agreed to NEVER Face Cena. He recalled it having no happy endings, if Taker wins. The streak lives on, but he loses and fans turn against Taker. If Cena wins then he ends the streak and no one will care about Taker at mania. Also, for those who don´t believe it. Dig up Cenas twitter posts. So Cena´s out of the book to face Taker. I don´t get why everyone wants to see it so bad anyway. Itś not going to happen.
|
|
|
Post by DgenerationX092 on Apr 19, 2011 7:16:54 GMT -5
Cena's facing Rock, so he's out. While I've tried looking at that point of view for a while "Hey, he's going to lose to accelerrate a new superstar", but honestly, its not going to happen. and heres why: Ever since Cena and Orton, there has not been a superstar WWE can wholeheartedly rely on to carry that torch you speak of. 95% (IMO) of the roster has since been misses.. not hits. MVP and Carlito were compared to The Rock and were believed to have the brightest future. Theyre fired. Kennedy.. Fired. Swagger, Dibiase, Sheamus, Morrison..... Miss, miss, miss, miss. Having any young Superstar on the roster beat Undertaker for the benefit of launching their career is too big of a gamble. If they fail to live up to expectations, that then means Undertaker was irreversibly robbed of his greatest feat by someone who will instantly go down as one of the worst Superstars in history, and tarnishing the legacy of one of the greatest Superstars in history. It sounds harsh, but if you can't benefit from what would be the greatest push in Wrestling's history, then you will become the scum of Wrestling's history. Also, Cena said he agreed to NEVER Face Cena. He recalled it having no happy endings, if Taker wins. The streak lives on, but he loses and fans turn against Taker. If Cena wins then he ends the streak and no one will care about Taker at mania. Also, for those who don´t believe it. Dig up Cenas twitter posts. So Cena´s out of the book to face Taker. I don´t get why everyone wants to see it so bad anyway. Itś not going to happen. Well, had Cena not already agreed to face Rock, I'd have been all for the match. Cena doesnt really raise a valid point: First of all, people hate John Cena, so it wont be such a bad thing that he loses. And if they are able to have a good enough match, and Taker wins cleanly, that shouldnt effect fans feelings towards Taker at all. Taker doesnt have to be a heel to work the match. And as far as why people want to see it, its simple: Theyre two completley different men since the last time they faced each other. Theres still story left to be told between them, and its really a shame they havent faced each other since 2003. I think WWE is making a bad move by not having Undertaker last Wrestlemania be with John Cena, they dropped the ball on this one.
|
|
|
Post by Rule 30 on Apr 19, 2011 7:23:36 GMT -5
lets get undertaker a new opponent, not the same 1 Not a single other person in the WWE is a credible threat to the streak outside of Triple H... Maybe Edge could've been but... seriously who would you put in there that can be built as a credible threat to the streak? I hate to say it, but John Cena? EDIT: Forgot about his match versus Rock.
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunterblood5 on Apr 19, 2011 7:31:01 GMT -5
It should be Ted Dieisbie or CM Punk and thats it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 11:33:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2011 10:41:10 GMT -5
Yeah, I used Cena hypothetically. I get what some people are saying that had WWE gone with original plans for guys like Kennedy or Lesnar to break the streak, that history has now shown us that it would be a complete waste. That being said though, I think the following guys could credibly break it, as they are clearly dedicated to the business:
Cena (let Taker beat HHH next year to go 20-0, then lose to Cena at Wrestlemania XXX and retire at 20-1 with the torch well and truly passed)
CM Punk - amazing heel heat. Imagine the promos the next night on Raw. And he's clearly a guy that isn't going anywhere.
Rebuild a guy like Sheamus.
Or give him the poetic ending and have Kane defeat him, before Taker, Kane and Bearer all disappear into the sunset together. That would definitely be a crowd pleaser.
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Apr 19, 2011 11:12:19 GMT -5
I don't like your idea, mister. I don't think they should have a rematch. I want The Undertaker to have a new opponent.
|
|