|
Post by wabarrett on Jun 21, 2011 16:17:19 GMT -5
Sigh... you two are just like WWE Creative. You think that being on the internet and being in the live attendence are two seperate worlds, like people in live attendence don't use the internet. EVERYBODY uses the internet nowadays. If you think otherwise, you're an idiot. Zack Ryder for being a guy that gets on Raw once in a blue moon is incredibly over. Can you imagine what they would translate to if they just listened to the people and just put him on Raw? What harm can it do? He's getting praise from top stars like John Cena, The Miz, even STONE COLD. I'm not asking for a mega push, just use him in some comedy segments. The people are sick of seeing Hornswoggle and Santino Marella, give us some variety. 1. I can't argue with the first point, yes of course there is overlap. 2. No. Just no. Show me an example of Zack Ryder ever getting a reaction that shows he is 'over', other than in his hometown. 10 people trying to chant his name in a unrelated match doesn't count. 3. 'The people' are not sick of Santino Marella though are they? Hence even his tiny segment at Capitol Punishment got something out of the crowd. Translation is 'I'm sick of Santino Marella, I like Zack Ryder and I need a good justification for this, I'll claim that he is sound in the ring, great on the stick and incredibly over'.
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Jun 21, 2011 16:22:21 GMT -5
For someone that spends so much time watching WWE, discussing WWE, and buying WWE merchandise....it sure is interesting that your two "go-to" insults are:
1. WWE related 2. A "sheep", in which the reference you are making is someone who blindly watches WWE and defends it as such.
I love being "people who disagree with you so you lump them into one group". Oh yeah, this also makes 3 different threads over the last 3 months or so where I've asked for either you or you and other members to justify something to me, and it's gone completely unanswered.
Nothing in this thread, or any other thread on WF, has answered the question in a NON BIAS WAY as to why Zack Ryder should be on TV.
|
|
gisles1414
Main Eventer
Let me hear you say OH YEAH!
Joined on: Jul 8, 2008 22:56:51 GMT -5
Posts: 1,691
|
Post by gisles1414 on Jun 21, 2011 16:32:07 GMT -5
I love how some people think that their opinion is the same as the other millions of people who watch WWE and know what they want and what they are/are not sick of. I also love how people know if the ing votes are rigged or aren't rigged like they work for the ing company. Just enjoy the ing show and stop your bitching.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Jun 21, 2011 16:58:36 GMT -5
If it wasn't rigged, then I can't believe more people voted for that idiot Kelly Kelly than Beth Phoenix. Plus the fact that Kelly Kelly actually won, really leads me to believe it was really rigged. I'm telling you, this whole thing was just a setup by the WWE to get people's phone numbers. Am I really the only one that sees this? Of the all the strange anomalies that occurred with last night's voting, you chose the one that made perfect sense to back up your argument? Kelly Kelly didn't need any rigging to win that vote. She would have won, hands down, rigged or not rigged, and WWE knew that. She's the most over diva in the company, bar none. No one else even comes close. It was blatantly obvious and WWE saw that, and a capitalized on the opportunity by setting her up to win the belt. Maybe you're right, it certainly wouldn't surprise my that one of the most worthless and un-charismatic Divas in the company is the most popular. Most WWE fans really are THAT stupid.
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Jun 21, 2011 17:00:02 GMT -5
Of the all the strange anomalies that occurred with last night's voting, you chose the one that made perfect sense to back up your argument? Kelly Kelly didn't need any rigging to win that vote. She would have won, hands down, rigged or not rigged, and WWE knew that. She's the most over diva in the company, bar none. No one else even comes close. It was blatantly obvious and WWE saw that, and a capitalized on the opportunity by setting her up to win the belt. Maybe you're right, it certainly wouldn't surprise my that one of the most worthless and un-charismatic Divas in the company is the most popular. Most WWE fans really are THAT stupid. says the WWE fan....
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Jun 21, 2011 17:03:04 GMT -5
Maybe you're right, it certainly wouldn't surprise my that one of the most worthless and un-charismatic Divas in the company is the most popular. Most WWE fans really are THAT stupid. says the WWE fan....
|
|
|
Post by Scotty on Jun 21, 2011 18:02:38 GMT -5
Knew it was a mess up
|
|
JedsWorld
Main Eventer
45+ Trading refs on classifieds.
Joined on: Apr 20, 2008 8:57:37 GMT -5
Posts: 4,470
|
Post by JedsWorld on Jun 21, 2011 18:51:51 GMT -5
Evan Bourne vs Sin Cara next Week on RAW!!
- WWE.com
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 15, 2024 14:50:56 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2011 20:51:35 GMT -5
People have to remember as well that most people have cell phone plans that have unlimited text for a set price a month, so I dont think that was a problem. Personally, I dont think anything has been rigged since Taboo Tuesday, people just wanna think that because its WWE, the techinal problems are pretty believable, because like mentioned above, I doubt WWE wanted to have Sin Cara look bad.
The one thing I wouldve loved to see last night... They should have had Zack Ryder as a choice for an opponet, just to see how many people would vote for him
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Jun 21, 2011 21:49:44 GMT -5
....so, Sin Cara vs Evan Bourne will happen, next week on Raw. The skeptic in me says, "WWE: Screw you guys that didn't vote Cara!" it's just to bad they don't want to make a similar fight for Zach Ryder.. but, the match was intended to go on to make Cara look impressive. Now will WWE deny us of a Raw Roulette stip? I call for a Scaffold match.
|
|