Tylor
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 23, 2008 18:17:08 GMT -5
Posts: 4,437
|
Post by Tylor on Jul 15, 2011 21:42:34 GMT -5
1.2
Last night's 7/14 Impact Wrestling drew a 1.19 cable rating. This is up from last week's 1.11 rating.
tnawrestlingnews.com
|
|
Squatch
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 17, 2010 14:16:53 GMT -5
Posts: 3,597
|
Post by Squatch on Jul 15, 2011 21:49:21 GMT -5
I wonder if Sting's title win helped. Now to really boost the ratings lets put the title on Hulk Hogan. jk
Aries vs. Shelley is gonna be good to see soon. I think we could possibly see Kendrick vs. Shelley vs. Aries for the X Division Championship at No Surrender or Bound For Glory.
|
|
|
|
Post by Triple S on Jul 15, 2011 21:50:26 GMT -5
I just wanna know the buy rate for Destination X! Haha
- Triple S
|
|
|
|
Post by Ministry of Darkness on Jul 16, 2011 0:34:58 GMT -5
I'm getting frustrated with these type of rating even tho the show is superior to the WWE product. My only observation is that WWE has saturated the USA wrestling market with crap for far to long, meaning no one whats to give Impact Wrestling or wrestling in general a chance!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 10, 2024 8:39:34 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2011 2:10:16 GMT -5
The change is coming, brother.  |
|
thespecialone
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 8, 2009 17:48:05 GMT -5
Posts: 2,762
|
Post by thespecialone on Jul 16, 2011 4:11:55 GMT -5
I'm getting frustrated with these type of rating even tho the show is superior to the WWE product. My only observation is that WWE has saturated the USA wrestling market with crap for far to long, meaning no one whats to give Impact Wrestling or wrestling in general a chance! I agree. |
|
|
|
Post by 1992 on Jul 16, 2011 4:47:04 GMT -5
I'm getting frustrated with these type of rating even tho the show is superior to the WWE product. My only observation is that WWE has saturated the USA wrestling market with crap for far to long, meaning no one whats to give Impact Wrestling or wrestling in general a chance! Lol no. The last few weeks of Punk/Cena/McMahon > ANYTHING TNA has done in about 2-3 years. I also find it  ing HILARIOUS that TNA tries to make every single other angle they do out to be a "shoot" or try to make it look "real", while WWE keeps everything kayfabe. And the one time WWE does try a modern shoot angle, it blew the roof off the wrestling world, and every time TNA tries, it just looks completely contrived and ridiculous. |
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hammers on Jul 16, 2011 7:56:40 GMT -5
I think it's a pretty hysterical argument to suggest that WWE's product is so bad, no one wants to give TNA a chance.
|
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jul 16, 2011 8:30:06 GMT -5
I'm getting frustrated with these type of rating even tho the show is superior to the WWE product. My only observation is that WWE has saturated the USA wrestling market with crap for far to long, meaning no one whats to give Impact Wrestling or wrestling in general a chance! Lol no. The last few weeks of Punk/Cena/McMahon > ANYTHING TNA has done in about 2-3 years. I also find it ing HILARIOUS that TNA tries to make every single other angle they do out to be a "shoot" or try to make it look "real", while WWE keeps everything kayfabe. And the one time WWE does try a modern shoot angle, it blew the roof off the wrestling world, and every time TNA tries, it just looks completely contrived and ridiculous. I agree. |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Jul 16, 2011 8:57:49 GMT -5
I'm getting frustrated with these type of rating even tho the show is superior to the WWE product. My only observation is that WWE has saturated the USA wrestling market with crap for far to long, meaning no one whats to give Impact Wrestling or wrestling in general a chance! Everyone is entitled to their opinion but that is just being delusional. Impact is better than it has been recently, but nowhere near the same level as the WWE. |
|
eddie eddie
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 17, 2009 17:54:26 GMT -5
Posts: 2,873
|
Post by eddie eddie on Jul 16, 2011 9:00:02 GMT -5
actually, i believe its better than WWE atm. not better than CM Punk vs. Cena, but better than everything else going on in the WWE. and uhh, i'm not delusional.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Jul 16, 2011 9:18:04 GMT -5
actually, i believe its better than WWE atm. not better than CM Punk vs. Cena, but better than everything else going on in the WWE. and uhh, i'm not delusional. I said it was delusional to say that it was superior to the WWE, not if you personally find it more entertaining. |
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Jul 16, 2011 12:36:34 GMT -5
Sad times, I thought the ratings would spike this week after DX.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jul 16, 2011 13:32:25 GMT -5
I think it's a pretty hysterical argument to suggest that WWE's product is so bad, no one wants to give TNA a chance. Agreed. If they hate WWE so much, they'll look for another wrestling product. They won't just sour on wrestling as a whole. |
|
|
|
Post by No Brokeback on Jul 16, 2011 14:23:21 GMT -5
I think it's sad that people think WWE's show is actually ANY good besides CM Punk and John Cena. For the person that says 'CM Punk and Cena are better than anything TNA has done in 3/4 years" hell, it's better than anything the WWE has put on since 2006.
TNA just needs to get on the road and do live shows. Build an audience around America rather than just in the east. Once that happens, you'll see rating rise a bit more. If it wins people over, that'll be great. But you can't expect a small company that has it's show in the same place every week to out-do the gigantic company known as WWE.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Dude on Jul 16, 2011 15:50:31 GMT -5
Honestly TNA was at it's best when they were on FSN.
|
|
