thekaniac
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Apr 10, 2011 8:54:58 GMT -5
Posts: 262
|
Post by thekaniac on Aug 15, 2011 16:11:29 GMT -5
So an "internet Billionare" buys Charlies house but Alan and Jake live there?? They shoul've said it was Charlies new found son
|
|
|
Post by Suckasays on Aug 15, 2011 16:15:43 GMT -5
So an "internet Billionare" buys Charlies house but Alan and Jake live there?? They shoul've said it was Charlies new found son I still think an interesting thing they could do on the show is have someone drop a kid off and say that it's Charlie's son. I mean, the whole 1/2 of the 2 1/2 men thing is kind of illogical now that Jake is older. then again, there would then be 3 1/2 men. Or maybe they could bring in Charlie's remains since he got smashed by a train or whatever. I'm sure they wouldn't be able to scrape up 100 % of him. So it could be 3 1/10 men.
|
|
facemeat
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 24, 2011 0:38:10 GMT -5
Posts: 2,891
|
Post by facemeat on Aug 15, 2011 17:14:55 GMT -5
So an "internet Billionare" buys Charlies house but Alan and Jake live there?? They shoul've said it was Charlies new found son I posted this immediately after Kutcher was announced, because I thought it sounded like something the writers would do, not necessarily because it's a good story: 1. After years of booze, drugs, and women, Charlie dies 2. Ashton, a wealthy, bisexual, promiscuous, entrepreneur buys Charlie's house 3. Because he's smitten with Alan, Alan pretends to be gay so he can remain in the house 4. "Comedic" antics ensue I'm beginning to think I was spot on.
|
|
|
Post by Word™ on Aug 15, 2011 17:45:16 GMT -5
They should have said it was Charlies son.. The internet billionaire thing seems like one of the dumbest ideas ever.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 6, 2024 16:45:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2011 20:43:50 GMT -5
So an "internet Billionare" buys Charlies house but Alan and Jake live there?? They shoul've said it was Charlies new found son I posted this immediately after Kutcher was announced, because I thought it sounded like something the writers would do, not necessarily because it's a good story: 1. After years of booze, drugs, and women, Charlie dies 2. Ashton, a wealthy, bisexual, promiscuous, entrepreneur buys Charlie's house 3. Because he's smitten with Alan, Alan pretends to be gay so he can remain in the house 4. "Comedic" antics ensue I'm beginning to think I was spot on. Reminds me of Threes Company.
|
|
|
Post by Mike Bockwinkel on Aug 15, 2011 21:44:04 GMT -5
So an "internet Billionare" buys Charlies house but Alan and Jake live there?? They shoul've said it was Charlies new found son I still think an interesting thing they could do on the show is have someone drop a kid off and say that it's Charlie's son. I mean, the whole 1/2 of the 2 1/2 men thing is kind of illogical now that Jake is older. then again, there would then be 3 1/2 men. Or maybe they could bring in Charlie's remains since he got smashed by a train or whatever. I'm sure they wouldn't be able to scrape up 100 % of him. So it could be 3 1/10 men. They should've written Kutcher as a post-op transsexual. Still call it Two and a half men.
|
|
|
Post by Prophet of Ash on Aug 15, 2011 21:46:36 GMT -5
Reminds me of how South Park killed off Chef because Isaac Hayes didn't like the way they portrayed scientology. if only it was actually funny like that was, and they used random clips in the same way..
|
|
|
Post by xtremeperil on Aug 16, 2011 5:57:09 GMT -5
I'm really excited for the new season. But two things that keep brought up, I don't think Ashton is a show killer. He has over seven million followers on twitter, the ninth most on twitter, so he definitely has a fan-base. Meaning those followers who already like TAAHM will give it a chance, and those who don't will probably give it a shot. Not saying Ashton will bring all those viewers, but I don't think he'll kill it. The people that won't watch because of him will be equaled out by those who will watch because of him. If anyone's the show killer, it's still Charlie. Besides, all the speculation about the premiere, they have a great chance to hook in viewers.
Also, Charlie's death too dark for a sitcom. I hate that. Anybody every watch the short-lived (three seasons) Fox sitcom Titus? That show was pretty damn dark, and was one of the funniest shows during it's time on. It also had good ratings, the only reason it was cancelled was, as Titus put it "If you call your bosses idiots long enough, they will cancel you". Now, TAAHM is nowhere near as funny as Titus, but their is still a chance it will be funny.
I just hope they don't completely bash the character to the point of not even caring about him. I remember watching the first season, back when the show had emotion to it (not much, but enough to let you know that they legitimately care/love each-other). I don't think I have to worry though. I've read that pretty much all of Charlie's exes will be at the funeral, so they can have most of them (some I'd be against) bash Charlie and make those jokes, where Alan and Jake may poke fun, but be generally sadden by his death.
|
|
|
Post by Ben - #6 Munchie on Aug 16, 2011 13:54:40 GMT -5
They should have done something where Charlie had to get an operation because something happened(maybe a fire) and he was disfigured, so then he comes back as Kutcher.
|
|
|
Post by Casalex Isn't Funny on Aug 16, 2011 14:40:41 GMT -5
Man, that's way too gruesome for a comedy.
|
|
|
Post by LeighD on Aug 16, 2011 17:22:32 GMT -5
Sounds like overkill!
|
|
|
Post by Mr. McCluer on Aug 17, 2011 12:39:56 GMT -5
gruesome, wish they would've just resigned Charlie, oh well, im still pumped!
|
|