JedsWorld
Main Eventer
45+ Trading refs on classifieds.
Joined on: Apr 20, 2008 8:57:37 GMT -5
Posts: 4,470
|
Post by JedsWorld on Feb 27, 2012 13:11:26 GMT -5
Just watched 'The True Story of WrestleMania' on BluRay (check it out if you haven't watched it before) and Triple H gave his opinion on The Undertaker's streak, saying that "It should never end"
But as we say every year, this could be the year where it actually does end.
So simple question, Should the streak end at WrestleMania 28?
|
|
|
|
Post by kenlarchtin on Feb 27, 2012 13:22:01 GMT -5
I think Undertaker will retire 20-0. I hope it ends for the shock factor and he retires 19-1. Either way I think he is retiring and the streak will not end. It will just be 20-0 and shirts and DVD's will come out about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Feb 27, 2012 13:25:35 GMT -5
I personally don't think so, at least not before 20-0. If he were to face someone next year, say even Cena, then I would be ok with him losing. 19-1 isn't good for marketing imo. 20-0 will see DVDs, t-shirts, etc. and Triple H doesn't gain anything from the win anyway.
That being said, it feels like he will lose this year, at least imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Undertaker on Feb 27, 2012 13:26:53 GMT -5
No. If it was going to end, Orton should've been the one. Nobody in the company is worthy of ending it and having Taker retire 20-0 is perfect.
|
|
|
|
Post by MacReady on Feb 27, 2012 13:34:05 GMT -5
Nope, it's gone this far, why end it now.
|
|
Brankind
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 3, 2006 7:42:42 GMT -5
Posts: 1,364
|
Post by Brankind on Feb 27, 2012 13:38:05 GMT -5
it should never end
|
|
|
|
Post by TheChamp420 on Feb 27, 2012 13:39:06 GMT -5
Nah, I feel like this is his legacy, his greatest accomplishment. Let him retire with the streak intact!
|
|
Infinite
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 27, 2009 13:49:36 GMT -5
Posts: 2,608
|
Post by Infinite on Feb 27, 2012 13:47:11 GMT -5
No way. At this point it just wouldn't be right for it to be broken, it's going to go down as one of WWE's greatest stories. Plus Triple H breaking it would leave a really sour taste in my mouth, as I'm sure it would for many other fans.
|
|
|
|
Post by Turnbuckle Zealot(Phil) on Feb 27, 2012 13:59:01 GMT -5
The Undertaker is the true "Greatest In-Ring Performer" of all time. No gimmick has stood the test of time as his has.
His gifts of HIAC, Casket, Buried Alive, even Inferno Matches, his 7 world championship, his royal rumble victory, they ALL pail in comparison to the streak in terms of the character(talking kafabe). To have it end would in a sense make it worth nothing. It is better to burn out than to fade away. He is the exception to the rule.
I do personally wish it could be 21 & 0 for the sake of the beauty in non-conformity. But I digress.
20-0 is fine by me!
|
|
|
|
Post by thehardys4life on Feb 27, 2012 14:03:32 GMT -5
19-1 HELL NO!
I hope he retires 20-0 or loses at 20-1
|
|
|
|
Post by OverTheEdge on Feb 27, 2012 14:32:49 GMT -5
Seeing as he's facing Triple H, I could go either way. If he was facing someone who could actually gain something (career elevation-wise), then I'd say absolutely. If the Undertaker retires 20-0, then that's that. I mean, yeah, good for him--but if he retires with his streak in tact, then when the Undertaker goes away, so does the legend of the streak. If someone were to beat him, however, even with the Undertaker gone, the streak would still live on in a sense, seeing as that person would, for the rest of their career, be able to claim themselves as the person who beat the Undertaker, as the person who ended the streak.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 2, 2024 22:35:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2012 14:52:03 GMT -5
No but, only to Sting
|
|
|
|
Post by 0,Y on Feb 27, 2012 15:05:20 GMT -5
20-0 and then let that poor mother  er retire |
|
ncw
Superstar
Joined on: Jun 5, 2011 14:33:51 GMT -5
Posts: 846
|
Post by ncw on Feb 27, 2012 15:16:04 GMT -5
It's what makes The Undertaker... The Undertaker. If you took his streak away, it would be like taking Goldusts costume and face paint.
|
|
|
|
Post by orton1994 on Feb 27, 2012 15:17:03 GMT -5
Should it end? No...Will it end? Yes
|
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Feb 27, 2012 15:18:22 GMT -5
It will never end. Doesn't matter of a should or could. It won't.
|
|
TheEdgeHead41
Main Eventer
#1 Mysterio Fan!
Joined on: Dec 2, 2009 15:20:46 GMT -5
Posts: 2,339
|
Post by TheEdgeHead41 on Feb 27, 2012 15:23:59 GMT -5
Not at all.
|
|
Jimex
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 5, 2009 20:11:18 GMT -5
Posts: 2,794
|
Post by Jimex on Feb 27, 2012 15:36:51 GMT -5
I definitely see him losing at Mania. It shouldn't end, but IMO it will. Miz is 2-0 at Mania, maybe he can be the next Taker  lol jk. |
|
|
|
Post by Cammi Oh on Feb 27, 2012 15:46:38 GMT -5
It should end when The Undertaker dies at (20+ NUMBER) to ZERO. As in, Undertaker wins EVERY WM until he can no longer move. They could even be short crappy matches where he choke-slams someone and immediately pins them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Feb 27, 2012 15:54:06 GMT -5
If he's retiring....the streak has to end. It's not like he's gonna get to 20-0 and then retire.
If they book him to win at Wrestlemania, there is no story on earth that makes sense for him to retire. Storyline-wise, as long as he is undefeated at Wrestlemania, his character is going to keep wrestling at Wrestlemania because his character will have proven he's still capable by beating Triple H, and because superstars will still keep challenging him.
The only way to write a story that makes sense for him to retire is to lose and have the streak broken and for Undertaker to see he's not capable anymore.
As a fan, I wouldn't buy him winning and then going "that's it, I'm done".....he just cut this huge promo last week about how he had doubts and he wants to prove he's still the man. So he's going to have one more fight and then quit? I wouldn't buy it.
|
|
