wrestlingfan2011
Main Eventer
Lucky lucky
Joined on: Apr 5, 2011 13:21:19 GMT -5
Posts: 2,465
|
Post by wrestlingfan2011 on Jul 13, 2012 23:40:25 GMT -5
I was looking close to the new taker figure and at his neck it doesnt have the tattoo of Sara and have the new other 2 tattoos, i would had prefer the sara cause it goes with that figure like the one i have from jakks
|
|
|
|
Post by AlexWestCollects on Jul 13, 2012 23:55:49 GMT -5
looks like dean is making more decals
|
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Lime Green Jello! on Jul 14, 2012 0:00:52 GMT -5
Considering hes not with her anymore, this comes as no surprise.
|
|
CMPunkSavior
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Feb 4, 2010 18:39:01 GMT -5
Posts: 495
|
Post by CMPunkSavior on Jul 14, 2012 0:16:20 GMT -5
Considering hes not with her anymore, this comes as no surprise. that and he had the tattoo removed also...I know I know the fig isn't true to the era |
|
lestial12
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 23, 2011 21:17:00 GMT -5
Posts: 1,496
|
Post by lestial12 on Jul 14, 2012 2:09:01 GMT -5
Its a "Meh" type thing to me. I still say its my #2 must have from Con after Bad Blood HBK. Speaking of Bad Blood HBK, we have Kane from that event, and now HBK. When are we gonna get an Undertaker in that attire?! I know purple glove Taker is more popular but since we have 2/3 of what made that cell match awesome we need the final piece of the puzzle  |
|
|
|
Post by Captain Charisma on Jul 14, 2012 2:23:10 GMT -5
I agree with the thread starter, figures should be true to their era. that's what makes the figure special.
I hope they fix it.
|
|
BURNING HAMMER
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Oct 30, 2011 5:40:52 GMT -5
Posts: 432
|
Post by BURNING HAMMER on Jul 14, 2012 8:55:23 GMT -5
I agree with the thread starter, figures should be true to their era. that's what makes the figure special. I hope they fix it. There's nothing to 'fix'. I doubt 'Taker or Michelle would be thrilled about the release of a figure of him with a tattoo of his ex-wife's name on it. |
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jul 14, 2012 9:12:32 GMT -5
No big deal to me. Everything else is fantastic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Glovatrix-Brent on Jul 14, 2012 10:11:29 GMT -5
I'm tired of the "revisionist history" thing WWE does. So what if he had the tattoo removed for any reason? It should be on a figure of him that is from the time he had it. Same as him having the gear, hair, ect.
You can't change the past WWE, so stop.
|
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Jul 14, 2012 10:18:22 GMT -5
Haha really? If I had my x-wife's name tattooed on me and then had it removed, I would make WWE airbrush it off in pictures and take it off figures and anything else. WWE clearly has respect for the guys personal life, and his current wife. I can't believe people were actually expecting it to be on the figure. This one is pretty black and white for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Jul 14, 2012 10:29:57 GMT -5
Its not a huge issue really and obviously is a personal one to him. Sure it aint accurate but its understandable why and its also a cost saved on the figure so its win win.
|
|
