Lando!
Superstar
"Silverdome"
Joined on: Jul 2, 2009 21:44:54 GMT -5
Posts: 850
|
Post by Lando! on Nov 23, 2012 20:07:20 GMT -5
I just picked up WWF No Mercy, Wrestlemania 2000 and WCW/ nWo Revenge today.
How do you guys think No Mercy and WWE 13 stack up? Or 13 with the other games?
|
|
|
Post by Flava Dave on Nov 23, 2012 20:33:04 GMT -5
Revenge > Wrestlemania > No Mercy > 13
All of them have little quirks, but at the end of the day, on higher difficulties you get competitive matches and they don't suffer from Smackdown's "doing moves just to build up a finisher" feel.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 6, 2024 21:04:00 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2012 0:51:17 GMT -5
Wrestlemania 2000 goes overlooked when talk of great wrestling games come up. WWE '13 is superior to No Mercy. While both great, WWE '13 is simply better: better graphics, better sound quality, better gameplay, online, better roster, full-length entrances, better story mode. Nostalgia is about the only thing that No Mercy ranks higher in. Not to say that I don't aboslutely LOVE No Mercy, I still play it to this day, but at the end of the day WWE '13 is the better of these two gaming goliaths.
|
|
|
Post by ahunter8056 on Nov 24, 2012 6:19:22 GMT -5
You can't compare those games. Those games were made over a decade ago, WWE '13 was produced this year.
|
|
|
Post by Next Man’s Knowing Rock on Nov 24, 2012 11:13:01 GMT -5
In 2012, WWE '13 is a thousand times better. But No Mercy for its time was better than WWE '13 is for its time.
|
|
|
Post by MacReady on Nov 24, 2012 11:26:24 GMT -5
How can you really compare the two; that's like comparing VHS and Bluray.
|
|
|
Post by Lewscher on Nov 24, 2012 17:10:15 GMT -5
agree with pc83uk again. 2nd thread I've done that lol. in any case, the customizability of characters and attires, cloning etc beats any 'features' other games might have. sure newer games have more match types, but that's been progression through the ages. I never count graphics when comparing cameras they always have mad always will improve, the main concerns a game . . . . IS GAMEPLAY! and the AkI series had that, and no mercy kicked it with the character edits, which is something I rarely see in games other than wm x8 on gamecube and the others in the smackdown ps2 but that's very few, and even so I could never view them so I never really knew what attire I chose.
but the free roaming it had was lovely as did the early smackdown series games. so the wrestling gameplay, arena free roam, and editing really made this game rule, same as those early smackdown series.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 6, 2024 21:04:00 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2012 8:14:45 GMT -5
Nothing beats the AKI games, let's be honest.
|
|
|
Post by Lewscher on Nov 29, 2012 6:02:16 GMT -5
Its between aki and multiple attires, And smackdown 1/2 match types Both sucked for entrances but Atleast you saw the arena on no mercy, not just the video on smackdown.
But both have great backstage, although I never have a hardcore match with hhh on no mercy as steph always turns it into a handicap match on no mercy.
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Nov 29, 2012 15:56:53 GMT -5
In 2012, WWE '13 is a thousand times better. But No Mercy for its time was better than WWE '13 is for its time. sums it up well.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 6, 2024 21:04:00 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 29, 2012 16:55:27 GMT -5
In 2012, WWE '13 is a thousand times better. But No Mercy for its time was better than WWE '13 is for its time. sums it up well. No it doesn't, WWE '13 isn't a "thousand times better" when games that are over a decade old have better AI.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 6, 2024 21:04:00 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2012 10:46:41 GMT -5
No mercy is 10 times better than 2000. also its better than WWE 13
|
|
Mr Wrestling Jr.
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 6, 2010 7:07:35 GMT -5
Posts: 3,410
|
Post by Mr Wrestling Jr. on Dec 5, 2012 0:52:23 GMT -5
How can you really compare the two; that's like comparing VHS and Bluray.
|
|
inkboy83
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 1, 2012 20:57:49 GMT -5
Posts: 1,088
|
Post by inkboy83 on Dec 5, 2012 1:15:25 GMT -5
I was considering going to school for game design for the sole purpose of remaking No Mercy on my own with better graphics and roster tweeks
|
|
|
Post by WalterF on Dec 5, 2012 11:37:48 GMT -5
In 2012, WWE '13 is a thousand times better. But No Mercy for its time was better than WWE '13 is for its time.
|
|
Lando!
Superstar
"Silverdome"
Joined on: Jul 2, 2009 21:44:54 GMT -5
Posts: 850
|
Post by Lando! on Dec 5, 2012 14:49:01 GMT -5
I really appreciate all of the feedback.
Obviously WWE 13 beats No Mercy due to advances in games, but what game serves the purpose of a wrestling game?
|
|
|
Post by Lewscher on Dec 6, 2012 6:50:23 GMT -5
Was just playing no mercy, never played ladder match on it, and I must say its the best I've played . But after just putting in wm2000, hands down its the better game. Better wrestlers, better attires, and most attires I was looking for in no mercy are in wm2000!!! Needless to say, looking for something I only had to look back!
Rocks sweat suit, and kanes double sleeve attire I was after something major! Wanted to have taker in kanes gear but it left an un tattood arm on no mercy Haha
But it was having to unlock things in no mercy that bothered me such as dude love hbk and undertaker ministry gear. This was a major bother for me.
But Atleast big show was in wm2000.
|
|
|
Post by pxkgotosleep on Dec 6, 2012 7:36:59 GMT -5
How can you really compare the two; that's like comparing VHS and Bluray. Implying that the disc that it's on, decides the quality of the game.
|
|