|
Post by Chris Hammers on Dec 21, 2012 19:20:17 GMT -5
I've always wanted to see Undertaker in a triple threat match at Wrestlmania, then his streak would be in real jeopardy, don't know why they've never done it I wouldn't have been surprised if Undertaker vs Triple H vs Shawn Michaels was ever talked about, or hinted towards
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 20, 2024 12:18:03 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2012 19:20:41 GMT -5
I had actually thought of Dean Ambrose vs The Undertaker. I think it would be fantastic.
|
|
|
Post by WalterF on Dec 21, 2012 19:22:53 GMT -5
I like building new talent, but The Sheild vs Undertaker isn't a big deal. It sounds like a match thT SHUD BE ON on raw, not WM.
It needs to be a big name.
|
|
|
Post by Planktung on Dec 21, 2012 19:25:18 GMT -5
I don't buy into that argument. Give me The Shield, who have reinvigorated the product, on the card rather than a boring guy who has "paid his dues" like Randy Orton. Also, just because The Shield has only been in WWE for a month doesn't mean they haven't paid their dues. Rollins and Ambrose in particular have put in just as much work as anyone on the roster, but they did it on the Indy scene. They shouldn't be punished for that. It's a matter of entertainment value and The Shield is more entertaining than pretty much anything in the WWE currently. Who cares what they did in the indies? That's completely irrelevant. They haven't contributed more than a few months to WWE's product. And in that time of contribution, they've become one of the most interesting and entertaining aspects of the product. The Shield deserve their spots on the 'Mania card.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 20, 2024 12:18:03 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2012 19:28:12 GMT -5
This would make less sense than when everybody wanted Undertaker vs. The Nexus 2 years ago....and Nexus actually attacked Undertaker TWICE and still that would have been a horrible match and a waste of the ONE Undertaker match we get per year. If the way the Shield was reckless and injured Tommy Dreamer is any indication of their level of protection for their opponents, I want them nowhere near The Undertaker, who is in a fragile condition as it is. They shouldn't be held responsible for what happened to Dreamer at all. It's wrestling, crap happens.
|
|
|
Post by HugoOne on Dec 21, 2012 19:48:28 GMT -5
It's not a bad idea and the logic totally makes sense. I don't think anyone would pick the Shield to win unlike the last few where people thought Shawn or Hunter might win but it would give them a good rub. On that merit, I'd rather they just do Taker and Team Hell No vs. the Shield. It gives Taker a match and preserves him to make it to Wrestlemania 30.
|
|
|
Post by Robert69 on Dec 21, 2012 19:52:02 GMT -5
Taker/Team Hell No vs. The Shield/Lesnar could be awesome. Lesnar on their team would automatically make them a threat, and would make it entertaining.
The only one from Shield that interests me is Reigns anyways so...meh.
|
|
|
Post by wwextreme25 on Dec 21, 2012 20:16:19 GMT -5
Taker/Team Hell No vs. The Shield/Lesnar could be awesome. Lesnar on their team would automatically make them a threat, and would make it entertaining. The only one from Shield that interests me is Reigns anyways so...meh. nahh by having people on the team with taker, it take away the "TAKER STREAK" as kane could get pinned by the shield and thats taker's streak gone. Seems kinda stupid. He should definitely be on his own.
|
|
|
Post by The Undertaker on Dec 21, 2012 20:40:57 GMT -5
Absolutely not. No. No way. No.
|
|
|
Post by JC Motors on Dec 21, 2012 22:15:25 GMT -5
I wouldn't want to see the streak broken
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 20, 2024 12:18:03 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2012 0:18:41 GMT -5
I don't hate the idea but there is no wy its gonna happen.
We are most likely getting CM Punk vs. Undertaker or John Cena vs. Undertaker (which is inevitable).
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Dec 22, 2012 21:40:10 GMT -5
I would schedule The Shield versus Team Hell No and The Undertaker in a Six Man Tag Team Match. Then, just before the match, Daniel Bryan is shown backstage out cold, making it a 3-on-2 Handicap Match between The Shield and the Brothers of Destruction.
|
|
|
Post by cattlemutilation on Dec 22, 2012 21:57:31 GMT -5
Good GOD no. Undertaker only has a few Wrestlemanias left in him. Let's not waste them. "A few"?!?!?
|
|
yinyang
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
We're here...
Joined on: Dec 31, 2002 10:00:22 GMT -5
Posts: 4,110
|
Post by yinyang on Dec 24, 2012 20:56:50 GMT -5
THE STREAK should NOT END!
Undertaker isnt gonna be around to to much longer i'd say 5 more manias making it 25 YEARS. 25-0. So with that said i would like to see Undertaker fight in matches we wanna see against superstars who everybody will wanna see vs. the undertaker at wrestlemania, with Taker only having 5 more,, possibly.
WrestleMANIA 29- Undertaker vs John CENA WrestleMANIA 30- Undertaker vs CM PUNK WrestleMANIA 31- Undertaker vs Dolph ZIGGLER WrestleMANIA 32- Undertake vs Sheamas WrestleMANIA 33- Undertaker vs Kane- Where the BROTHERS OF DESTRUCTION retire together at WrestleMANIA 33. The match ends in a draw by both men being buried alive, or falling off the top of the WrestleMANIA 33 stage....well in some way where they both become FINISHED. I love them, i would liek to see my favorite KANE go out like that with Taker.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 20, 2024 12:18:03 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 25, 2012 10:43:06 GMT -5
I definitely think the Shield should be part of Wrestlemania one way or another be it an assault on the winner of a certain match or in a match of their own.
A match with the Undertaker would certainly be great as it would rocket their careers and put them on the map, even if they lose. A detail that really helps make this match credible is the fact that the Undertaker once said he would only agree to losing his streak to a new talent that would benefit from the push.
The only problem I have with this match is that Kane will most probably interfere and therefore soil the claim that they legit beat the Undertaker or that Undertaker legit beat them.
|
|
Lionheart S.M
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Mar 15, 2012 15:01:33 GMT -5
Posts: 291
|
Post by Lionheart S.M on Dec 26, 2012 19:23:11 GMT -5
Keep them undefeated until Mania, then they lose to Taker.. I'm a big fan of Shield and Taker and I think it would make a GREAT match and Storyline, Ambrose and Taker playing mind games with each other? YES.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 20, 2024 12:18:03 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 26, 2012 19:30:13 GMT -5
I've always wanted to see Undertaker in a triple threat match at Wrestlmania, then his streak would be in real jeopardy, don't know why they've never done it That would be highly interesting. Well he was in a Tag team match that turned as a Handicap Match against Big Show and Albert. Now that's REALLY putting the streak in jeopardy.
|
|
|
Post by Next Man’s Yeeter on Dec 26, 2012 20:13:56 GMT -5
I wouldn't want to see the streak broken I don't think anyone's silly enough to suggest The Shield should WIN the match, some folks just want to see them mix it up with Taker.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 20, 2024 12:18:03 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2012 0:04:24 GMT -5
The Undertaker did say on a few occasions that if he ever chooses to end his streak, he would rather do it against a promising new talent that could benefit greatly from the boost.
Perhaps if the Shield had debuted sooner and that we would know what they are capable of 1 v 1 (in the WWE) one of the shield members could be the guy who beats Taker and gets the push of a lifetime.
|
|
|
Post by AlexWestCollects on Dec 27, 2012 0:09:28 GMT -5
I wish he would just go away for good. I'm tired of seeing him once a yr in the same match where they kick out of 100 finishers.
|
|