mrassbillygunn
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Jul 23, 2011 19:35:48 GMT -5
Posts: 4,267
|
Post by mrassbillygunn on Feb 20, 2013 16:57:58 GMT -5
Whats the chances? I think its a real possibility, both having their last Mania and Rock going over Taker and ending the streak. With Taker already having 20-0 in the bag i dont think hes anything to loose by getting beat if this does happen. You heard it here first folks!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 11, 2024 23:04:27 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2013 17:02:48 GMT -5
It would be great.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Giggs' Munchies on Feb 20, 2013 17:03:05 GMT -5
The match could happen. But Rock going over? No way in hell.
|
|
|
|
Post by T on Feb 20, 2013 17:03:56 GMT -5
Rock's done enough already. He doesn't need to break the streak. Punk's the best suggestion I've heard if it has to be broken.
|
|
|
|
Post by el torro on Feb 20, 2013 17:08:13 GMT -5
Knowing how the WWE loves the Rock so much, it wouldn't surprise me if Rock would go over Taker.
|
|
mrassbillygunn
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Jul 23, 2011 19:35:48 GMT -5
Posts: 4,267
|
Post by mrassbillygunn on Feb 20, 2013 17:08:38 GMT -5
Rock's done enough already. He doesn't need to break the streak. Punk's the best suggestion I've heard if it has to be broken. I dont think Punk has the credentials to take on Taker in a landmark such as WMXXX. Punk is a big name no doubt about it, but what sounds better for WMXXX...Rock vs Taker or Punk vs Taker? |
|
|
|
Post by T on Feb 20, 2013 17:09:27 GMT -5
Rock vs Taker sounds better for a headline match, but I wouldn't want him to go over Taker, even though I'm a huge Rock fan.
The Taker/Punk feud would be brilliant with Punk playing his bad ass heel. He could also carry Taker to a good match.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 11, 2024 23:04:27 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2013 17:09:53 GMT -5
Rock's done enough already. He doesn't need to break the streak. Punk's the best suggestion I've heard if it has to be broken. I dont think Punk has the credentials to take on Taker in a landmark such as WMXXX. Punk is a big name no doubt about it, but what sounds better for WMXXX...Rock vs Taker or Punk vs Taker? I have a feeling it will be Brock vs Taker at WMXXX. |
|
|
|
Post by Brad on Feb 20, 2013 17:13:36 GMT -5
Rock's done enough already. He doesn't need to break the streak. Punk's the best suggestion I've heard if it has to be broken. I dont think Punk has the credentials to take on Taker in a landmark such as WMXXX. Punk is a big name no doubt about it, but what sounds better for WMXXX...Rock vs Taker or Punk vs Taker? But whoever beats taker for the streak should be someone who will really benefit from it. That's the ultimate rub and while I disagree with you about Punk not having the creds to do it, even if you're right....beating taker could be what he needs to get that extra push. Your idea does exactly what WWE doesn't need to do and that's continue to rely on older stars rather than creating new ones. Sorry bad idea. |
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Feb 20, 2013 17:17:30 GMT -5
can't see it...considering neither of them need the gain. a hhh/rock match would do better anyways.
|
|
mrassbillygunn
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Jul 23, 2011 19:35:48 GMT -5
Posts: 4,267
|
Post by mrassbillygunn on Feb 20, 2013 18:41:19 GMT -5
I dont think Punk has the credentials to take on Taker in a landmark such as WMXXX. Punk is a big name no doubt about it, but what sounds better for WMXXX...Rock vs Taker or Punk vs Taker? But whoever beats taker for the streak should be someone who will really benefit from it. That's the ultimate rub and while I disagree with you about Punk not having the creds to do it, even if you're right....beating taker could be what he needs to get that extra push. Your idea does exactly what WWE doesn't need to do and that's continue to rely on older stars rather than creating new ones. Sorry bad idea. Yea fair enough i get that WWE shouldnt rely on older stars BUT the fact is just like Rock vs Hogan was a huge deal the rock vs taker would be massive and draw bejamins a plenty! I disagree about punk needing or getting an extra push by beating Taker because if that year long reign as champ isnt a push that takes him to the next level then i dont know what is! |
|
|
|
Post by Brad on Feb 20, 2013 18:43:09 GMT -5
But whoever beats taker for the streak should be someone who will really benefit from it. That's the ultimate rub and while I disagree with you about Punk not having the creds to do it, even if you're right....beating taker could be what he needs to get that extra push. Your idea does exactly what WWE doesn't need to do and that's continue to rely on older stars rather than creating new ones. Sorry bad idea. Yea fair enough i get that WWE shouldnt rely on older stars BUT the fact is just like Rock vs Hogan was a huge deal the rock vs taker would be massive and draw bejamins a plenty! I disagree about punk needing or getting an extra push by beating Taker because if that year long reign as champ isnt a push that takes him to the next level then i dont know what is! I'm not saying Punk NEEDS it. I was just combating your stance that he doesn't have the creds for it. I disagree. |
|
mrassbillygunn
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Jul 23, 2011 19:35:48 GMT -5
Posts: 4,267
|
Post by mrassbillygunn on Feb 20, 2013 18:47:13 GMT -5
Yea fair enough i get that WWE shouldnt rely on older stars BUT the fact is just like Rock vs Hogan was a huge deal the rock vs taker would be massive and draw bejamins a plenty! I disagree about punk needing or getting an extra push by beating Taker because if that year long reign as champ isnt a push that takes him to the next level then i dont know what is! I'm not saying Punk NEEDS it. I was just combating your stance that he doesn't have the creds for it. I disagree. Yea ill take that back, considering what Punk has done over the last year especially id say he would actually have the creds for a match with Taker. Still, i dont think you can argue that Rock vs Taker would be the bigger draw. |
|
yinyang
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
We're here...
Joined on: Dec 31, 2002 10:00:22 GMT -5
Posts: 4,110
|
Post by yinyang on Feb 20, 2013 18:54:13 GMT -5
i think brock and rock may happen by what heyman said on twitter...saying he has an opponent for the rock.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brad on Feb 20, 2013 18:57:02 GMT -5
I'm not saying Punk NEEDS it. I was just combating your stance that he doesn't have the creds for it. I disagree. Yea ill take that back, considering what Punk has done over the last year especially id say he would actually have the creds for a match with Taker. Still, i dont think you can argue that Rock vs Taker would be the bigger draw. Oh there's no doubt it'd be a bigger draw. |
|
|
|
Post by Lk™ on Feb 20, 2013 19:03:09 GMT -5
...  that. |
|
@BiggAlbowski
Mid-Carder
I'll be comin at ya NODE!
Joined on: Mar 15, 2007 15:53:32 GMT -5
Posts: 368
|
Post by @BiggAlbowski on Feb 20, 2013 19:54:00 GMT -5
Rock is my third favorite wrestler (1. Roddy Piper 2. Sabu) and I wouldn't wanna see Rock end "The Streak" Or Punk. Leave It be!
|
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Feb 21, 2013 0:43:30 GMT -5
The match wouldn't interest me much to be honest. The whole feel of the feud would just be too similar to Undertaker vs. Triple H where it's the last two guys representing an era with each guy needing a victory to be able to ride off into the sunset and call it a career. There would really be no basis for a feud between the two besides that. Plus, you would also have to take into account the fact that the feud would be tough to book with Taker and Rock both working part-time schedules nowadays.
|
|
