|
Post by Mr. Old School™ on Mar 31, 2013 22:42:25 GMT -5
Hey guys,
With 'Takers match and streak on the line against Punk coming up, it got me thinking of other "records" that in my opinion, won't ever be beat.
Some that come to mind right off the bat are Bruno Sammartino's reign as Heavyweight champion. That won't ever be beat. No way. Others are Demolition's reign as Tag Team champions and The Honky Tonk Man's reign as Intercontinental champion. Although I believe Shelton Benjamin came very close to tieing during his reign.
Another would be The Fabulous Moolah's reign as Women's champion, which they say was something like 27 years. Not sure if that is entirely true or what.
Can you guys think of any other WWE "records"??
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 29, 2024 5:02:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2013 22:43:06 GMT -5
santinos royal rumble record
|
|
|
Post by DTP. on Mar 31, 2013 22:45:24 GMT -5
Gregory Helms' thirteen-month long reign of supremacy as WWE Cruiserweight Champion from 2006-2007, I think that's a forgettable title reign (probably with reason).
Another being London and Kendrick's 400-plus day reign as WWE Tag Team Champions. Unless the tag division dies out again to the point of having only one team, there isn't going to be another Tag title reign of any kind that lasts THAT long.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Old School™ on Mar 31, 2013 22:53:59 GMT -5
santinos royal rumble record Ha!! So true. How about quickest match in history?? Who holds the record for quickest match?? Quickest matches I've seen are The Dynamite Kid vs. Nikolai Volkoff and Spike Dudley vs. William Regal for the European title on Raw. Both only lasted seconds and that includes the referees 3-count.
|
|
|
Post by HHH316 on Mar 31, 2013 22:54:31 GMT -5
Backlund's first title run.
His second title loss.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 31, 2013 22:58:05 GMT -5
The longest Moolah held the title was 10 years. The WWE doesn't recognize the times she lost the belt. So they just say she kept it until she lost the WWF women's title even though the original women's title was different than the WWF women's title.
|
|
|
Post by ~*Young $ Money*~ on Mar 31, 2013 22:59:07 GMT -5
Whatever ones they don't want to be broken. I think most of the older ones are safe though like longest reign, Takers streak. You just don't see guys last as long anymore especially just in WWE.
|
|
|
Post by drifter on Mar 31, 2013 23:00:01 GMT -5
Gregory Helms' thirteen-month long reign of supremacy as WWE Cruiserweight Champion from 2006-2007, I think that's a forgettable title reign (probably with reason). Another being London and Kendrick's 400-plus day reign as WWE Tag Team Champions. Unless the tag division dies out again to the point of having only one team, there isn't going to be another Tag title reign of any kind that lasts THAT long. They had a long reign, but it wasn't 400 plus days, it was 331 days.
|
|
weaseltv
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 22, 2013 18:57:55 GMT -5
Posts: 3,672
|
Post by weaseltv on Mar 31, 2013 23:05:23 GMT -5
yea, the longest title reigns won't be broken... the WWE has titles change hands too often. how about Kane eliminating 11 people in the Royal Rumble in 2001, or the longest WWE singles match Michaels vs Hart at WM12.
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Mar 31, 2013 23:27:13 GMT -5
Trish's 7 reigns as WWE Women's Champion won't be broken considering the belt is retired.
If WWE forgets Cesaro is US Champ and doesn't book him much to defend his US Title, he may beat MVP's WWE US Title record for longest reign. He's had it for nearly 8 months so why not let him get to a year+?
|
|
|
Post by Jaz on Mar 31, 2013 23:31:08 GMT -5
Bruno Sammartino's title reign.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 29, 2024 5:02:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2013 23:33:21 GMT -5
kanes most eliminations at royal rumble
|
|
spookytuesday
Superstar
Joined on: Jan 10, 2010 20:14:06 GMT -5
Posts: 848
|
Post by spookytuesday on Mar 31, 2013 23:38:12 GMT -5
The 93,000 attendance record from Wrestlemania III
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 31, 2013 23:43:53 GMT -5
The 93,000 attendance record from Wrestlemania III Not saying he's right but Meltzer says that the number was closer to 78,000. If that is true then SummerSlam 1992 beat that.
|
|
|
Post by Nivro™ on Mar 31, 2013 23:44:13 GMT -5
The 93,000 attendance record from Wrestlemania III It can be broken if they do it right at Cowboys stadium. I still dont buy the 93k is legit though. Flair's "legit" 24 world title reigns probably wont be broken.
|
|
|
Post by DMO™ on Mar 31, 2013 23:44:18 GMT -5
Please put up the honky-tonky-meter....
|
|
spookytuesday
Superstar
Joined on: Jan 10, 2010 20:14:06 GMT -5
Posts: 848
|
Post by spookytuesday on Mar 31, 2013 23:52:06 GMT -5
The 93,000 attendance record from Wrestlemania III It can be broken if they do it right at Cowboys stadium. I still dont buy the 93k is legit though. Legit or not, I don't think it's possible for them to break that amount in any stadium today with the giant stage setups they use that take up a whole end of the stadium.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Old School™ on Mar 31, 2013 23:52:21 GMT -5
The 93,000 attendance record from Wrestlemania III Not saying he's right but Meltzer says that the number was closer to 78,000. If that is true then SummerSlam 1992 beat that. If that's true, then 'Mania 23 in Detroit was the biggest with over 80,000. I was there for that one.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 31, 2013 23:54:38 GMT -5
Not saying he's right but Meltzer says that the number was closer to 78,000. If that is true then SummerSlam 1992 beat that. If that's true, then 'Mania 23 in Detroit was the biggest with over 80,000. I was there for that one. SS92 had 80,355 while WM23 had 80,103 so SummerSlam would be bigger but not by much.
|
|
weaseltv
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 22, 2013 18:57:55 GMT -5
Posts: 3,672
|
Post by weaseltv on Apr 1, 2013 0:25:00 GMT -5
Please put up the honky-tonky-meter.... Santino was so close
|
|