|
|
Post by sean™ on Dec 4, 2013 14:09:52 GMT -5
There's a fair chance that by Wrestlemania, we will have one Major Championship instead of two. And since there'd be no point in having an entire PPV created around ONE Ladder Match, am I the only one that hopes Money in the Bank moves back to Wrestlemania?
I feel like ever since the PPV came about, there's been one good case holder and one "ehh" case holder each year. With the match taking place at Wrestlemania, it allows WWE to put the spotlight on about 8 individuals, and even more if you have "qualifying" matches as they have in the past. Make it as special as it has been in the past, while also taking the place of the default "Multi person tag match" that has plagued Wrestlemania for quite a while.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 21:31:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2013 14:23:04 GMT -5
I wish they'd just cancel every PPV that isn't Summerslam, Survivor Series, Royal Rumble and Wrestlemania. Add King of the Ring and we won't have tons of crappy PPVs every year. Match types like Elimination Chamber, HIAC, MITB etc can just happen at any of the aforementioned PPVs.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 21:31:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2013 14:26:16 GMT -5
I wish they'd just cancel every PPV that isn't Summerslam, Survivor Series, Royal Rumble and Wrestlemania. Add King of the Ring and we won't have tons of crappy PPVs every year. Match types like Elimination Chamber, HIAC, MITB etc can just happen at any of the aforementioned PPVs. Knowing Vince, he would do that but then raise the PPV prices to $80 and $100 for Mania. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 21:31:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2013 14:30:11 GMT -5
Sound like a good idea!  |
|
MattelsRule
Main Eventer
JakksRule is dead! Long live MattelsRule!
Joined on: Mar 18, 2005 2:03:07 GMT -5
Posts: 2,468
|
Post by MattelsRule on Dec 4, 2013 14:45:27 GMT -5
I wish they'd just cancel every PPV that isn't Summerslam, Survivor Series, Royal Rumble and Wrestlemania. Add King of the Ring and we won't have tons of crappy PPVs every year. Match types like Elimination Chamber, HIAC, MITB etc can just happen at any of the aforementioned PPVs. Knowing Vince, he would do that but then raise the PPV prices to $80 and $100 for Mania. And I'd fn pay it because it'd be WORTH IT. PPVs would mean something... |
|
WMDman
Main Eventer
Bad times don't last, but bad guys do.
Joined on: Jan 6, 2013 10:18:05 GMT -5
Posts: 4,469
|
Post by WMDman on Dec 4, 2013 14:50:20 GMT -5
I'm down
|
|
|
|
Post by Edge618 on Dec 4, 2013 14:54:14 GMT -5
It'd make sense so no, they probably wouldn't do it
|
|
|
|
Post by Next Man’s Knowing Rock on Dec 4, 2013 14:55:51 GMT -5
I don't mind. It'd get eight guys on the WrestleMania card, but at the same time... I like the Money in the Bank PPV having that hook. In this era of dull writing, that ladder match (even if there was only one) still adds a selling point to what would otherwise be a bland July PPV. Whereas WrestleMania doesn't really need a selling point when it has Lesnar, Undertaker, HHH etc... That said, this is WrestleMania 30 and they don't have Rock or Austin, so a Money in the Bank match could add a lot to it. Knowing Vince, he would do that but then raise the PPV prices to $80 and $100 for Mania. And I'd fn pay it because it'd be WORTH IT. PPVs would mean something... False. Reducing the number of PPVs doesn't make the remaining PPVs special. Proof: TNA. The thing that makes PPVs mean something is good writing. WWE has in the past made PPVs mean something despite running twelve a year, and could do that again if they really put that focus on the writing and developing talent. |
|
|
|
Post by McBlake on Dec 4, 2013 14:59:55 GMT -5
Now's the time. Gives the midcard something to do at the biggest PPV of them all as well.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 21:31:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2013 15:02:34 GMT -5
I can get behind this idea. I can get behind it..................... and do some things.  |
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Dec 4, 2013 15:49:49 GMT -5
I can get behind this idea. I can get behind it..................... and do some things. QFT |
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Dec 4, 2013 15:51:44 GMT -5
I don't mind. It'd get eight guys on the WrestleMania card, but at the same time... I like the Money in the Bank PPV having that hook. In this era of dull writing, that ladder match (even if there was only one) still adds a selling point to what would otherwise be a bland July PPV. Whereas WrestleMania doesn't really need a selling point when it has Lesnar, Undertaker, HHH etc... That said, this is WrestleMania 30 and they don't have Rock or Austin, so a Money in the Bank match could add a lot to it. Fair Point. In that case, if they did continue the PPV AND continue to put a spotlight on the tag titles, I'd love to see a Tag Team Money In The Bank Match. WWE seems to have forgotten that "Multi Men Ladder Matches" can't include people on the same team, unless one turns on the other. |
|
|
|
Post by BrIaNMeRcY on Dec 4, 2013 15:58:00 GMT -5
I don't mind. It'd get eight guys on the WrestleMania card, but at the same time... I like the Money in the Bank PPV having that hook. In this era of dull writing, that ladder match (even if there was only one) still adds a selling point to what would otherwise be a bland July PPV. Whereas WrestleMania doesn't really need a selling point when it has Lesnar, Undertaker, HHH etc... That said, this is WrestleMania 30 and they don't have Rock or Austin, so a Money in the Bank match could add a lot to it. And I'd fn pay it because it'd be WORTH IT. PPVs would mean something... False. Reducing the number of PPVs doesn't make the remaining PPVs special. Proof: TNA. The thing that makes PPVs mean something is good writing. WWE has in the past made PPVs mean something despite running twelve a year, and could do that again if they really put that focus on the writing and developing talent. In the past, the July PPV's felt like throw-a-way events. The month placement for Money In The Bank is perfect. You don't need a MITB ladder match to seel WrestleMania. The name WrestleMania has become synonymous with not only casual & hardcore wrestling fans but to the mainstream media. You place big names on the marquee on the biggest show of the year and that's all you need to sell WrestleMania. While it sounds good to do a MITB ladder match at 'Mania, but the MITB match has kinda outgrew WrestleMania. You can agree or disagree with that. I'll leave it up to you. |
|
MattelsRule
Main Eventer
JakksRule is dead! Long live MattelsRule!
Joined on: Mar 18, 2005 2:03:07 GMT -5
Posts: 2,468
|
Post by MattelsRule on Dec 4, 2013 16:24:27 GMT -5
I don't mind. It'd get eight guys on the WrestleMania card, but at the same time... I like the Money in the Bank PPV having that hook. In this era of dull writing, that ladder match (even if there was only one) still adds a selling point to what would otherwise be a bland July PPV. Whereas WrestleMania doesn't really need a selling point when it has Lesnar, Undertaker, HHH etc... That said, this is WrestleMania 30 and they don't have Rock or Austin, so a Money in the Bank match could add a lot to it. And I'd fn pay it because it'd be WORTH IT. PPVs would mean something... False. Reducing the number of PPVs doesn't make the remaining PPVs special. Proof: TNA. The thing that makes PPVs mean something is good writing. WWE has in the past made PPVs mean something despite running twelve a year, and could do that again if they really put that focus on the writing and developing talent. I wholeheartedly agree, however, there would be a bigger feel to the events if they weren't so saturated. |
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Dec 4, 2013 18:15:51 GMT -5
ALL gimmick PPVs should be ended.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 21:31:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2013 18:51:01 GMT -5
Yes, as said most gimmick ppvs should go but I love the chamber and if all matches were held inside it, it would be sweet
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Dec 4, 2013 20:09:30 GMT -5
This is how the year of PPVS should go:
Royal Rumble
No Way Out
Wrestlemania
Judgement Day
King Of The Ring
SummerSlam
No Mercy
Armageddon
|
|
|
|
Post by Duck Holliday on Dec 5, 2013 5:26:52 GMT -5
I guess I want Rumble, Summerslam, Survivor Series and Mania... yes I want King of the Ring back too. and then maybe just one more to bring it to six a year (which I think is reasonable). Honestly get rid of Hell in a Cell and TLC... The cell should just be made available to appropriate matches and appropriate events (same with TLC matches).
|
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Dec 5, 2013 10:57:53 GMT -5
If they replace the MITB PPV with KotR and move the MITB match back to Mania, I'm 100% on board. That means the winner of KOTR would face the WWE Champion at SummerSlam and then the MITB holder can challenge at any point. So it's essentially the same idea, giving two guys the rub, but in two different ways.
I think this would be a good year to bring the match back to Mania just in general. 30 needs something special and I would love to see a bunch of young guys steal the show. Throw in Cody Rhodes, Ziggler, The Shield, Sandow, Kofi, and Wade Barrett, and really let someone feel like the next guy from the match.
|
|
