|
|
Post by Epic Z on Dec 11, 2013 13:20:05 GMT -5
What purpose is the Elimination chamber going to serve after the unification? The winner of the match would always go on to WM to face the champion that didn't get picked by the RR winner but now with champion that can't happen? What purpose is the EC going to serve? Will the EC match now be a for the unified title?
|
|
ewilliams7237
Superstar
Joined on: Oct 30, 2013 6:42:08 GMT -5
Posts: 741
|
Post by ewilliams7237 on Dec 11, 2013 13:23:21 GMT -5
Maybe they can spin to. Put your self through hell at the elimination chamber and earn the right to face the champ at extreme rules in the match you want. Idk just off the top of my head.
|
|
|
|
Post by James on Dec 11, 2013 13:36:31 GMT -5
True, good point.
The winner of the RR could defend his position in the chamber but that would make the RR pointless. Elimination chamber without a match in huge chamber would be so humiliating...
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 19, 2024 16:22:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2013 13:45:36 GMT -5
I would think they just make the Chamber match itself for the title. I could easily see them going that route with it.
|
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Dec 11, 2013 13:48:56 GMT -5
I see them making the Chamber match for the title, but I'd rather see a unique twist. Make someone like Punk or Bryan win the Rumble, and because they are feuding with the Authority, they place the Rumble title shot on the line at EC.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 19, 2024 16:22:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2013 13:54:30 GMT -5
I see them making the Chamber match for the title, but I'd rather see a unique twist. Make someone like Punk or Bryan win the Rumble, and because they are feuding with the Authority, they place the Rumble title shot on the line at EC. That would be unique and I don't think I'd mind it either. Could you imagine how pissed people would be though if Punk or Bryan won the Rumble then lost their spot in the Chamber. People would be so mad on here. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 19, 2024 16:22:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2013 13:56:51 GMT -5
Maybe they'll finally have a tag elimination chamber match like they have in all the games
|
|
raVen™
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
WF 10 Year Member
Joined on: Jul 11, 2003 5:33:22 GMT -5
Posts: 2,920
|
Post by raVen™ on Dec 11, 2013 13:59:05 GMT -5
What purpose is the Elimination chamber going to serve after the unification? The winner of the match would always go on to WM to face the champion that didn't get picked by the RR winner but now with champion that can't happen? What purpose is the EC going to serve? Will the EC match now be a for the unified title? I think they should do away with the thing anyways. They won't let anyone do any cool spots in it anymore so it's just a big Rooster tease in the end. And if I recall, the last 2 have been crap like the last 3 Survivor series matches. On a side note, oh Chocolate Shark, Hurricanes custom belt is sick! |
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Dec 11, 2013 14:02:53 GMT -5
I see them making the Chamber match for the title, but I'd rather see a unique twist. Make someone like Punk or Bryan win the Rumble, and because they are feuding with the Authority, they place the Rumble title shot on the line at EC. That would be unique and I don't think I'd mind it either. Could you imagine how pissed people would be though if Punk or Bryan won the Rumble then lost their spot in the Chamber. People would be so mad on here. That'd be fine with me. I imagine most people would just assume the winner of the Rumble would also hypothetically win the Chamber as well. What a great build up it'd be for someone like Daniel Bryan leading into Wrestlemania. Won at Summerslam, screwed. Won at Night of Champions, screwed. Screwed out of picking up the win at both Battleground and Hell In a Cell. Then to win the Royal Rumble and have to then win an Elimination Chamber all for another shot at the title. But knowing WWE, we'll get something else. |
|
Dr. Mantis Toboggan MD
Main Eventer
I need a monster condom for my magnum sized dong.
Joined on: Nov 25, 2011 16:25:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,713
|
Post by Dr. Mantis Toboggan MD on Dec 11, 2013 14:30:33 GMT -5
Maybe we will finally get a 3 vs 3 Elimination Chamber Match.
|
|
rudyhoneybee
Jobber
Joined on: Dec 29, 2009 0:49:39 GMT -5
Posts: 45 
|
Post by rudyhoneybee on Dec 11, 2013 15:07:37 GMT -5
What purpose is the Elimination chamber going to serve after the unification? The winner of the match would always go on to WM to face the champion that didn't get picked by the RR winner but now with champion that can't happen? What purpose is the EC going to serve? Will the EC match now be a for the unified title? I think they should do away with the thing anyways. They won't let anyone do any cool spots in it anymore so it's just a big Rooster tease in the end. And if I recall, the last 2 have been crap like the last 3 Survivor series matches. On a side note, oh Chocolate Shark, Hurricanes custom belt is sick! I could see winner of the Rumble (Punk or Bryan) with the other and Cody Rhodes vs the Champion, Kane, and Goldust for wrestlemania stipulation. Hell even wargames could work for it. |
|
raVen™
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
WF 10 Year Member
Joined on: Jul 11, 2003 5:33:22 GMT -5
Posts: 2,920
|
Post by raVen™ on Dec 11, 2013 15:23:15 GMT -5
I think they should do away with the thing anyways. They won't let anyone do any cool spots in it anymore so it's just a big Rooster tease in the end. And if I recall, the last 2 have been crap like the last 3 Survivor series matches. On a side note, oh Chocolate Shark, Hurricanes custom belt is sick! I could see winner of the Rumble (Punk or Bryan) with the other and Cody Rhodes vs the Champion, Kane, and Goldust for wrestlemania stipulation. Hell even wargames could work for it. I'd like war games, only prob is those are all team based events with the champinos involved, no way to get a clear main event title match out of it. |
|
|
|
Post by BrIaNMeRcY on Dec 11, 2013 15:49:10 GMT -5
I would think they just make the Chamber match itself for the title. I could easily see them going that route with it. I was thinking the same thing too. Makes sense given you can't do much having a sole champion as opposed to two. |
|
|
|
Post by jordanimal on Dec 11, 2013 16:31:37 GMT -5
I would think they just make the Chamber match itself for the title. I could easily see them going that route with it. this would be the easiest way to keep the EC still going w/ meaning. plus it may make the chamber match have even more value and improtance, like it originally was when it came about in 2002 |
|
|
|
Post by philly boi on Dec 11, 2013 16:49:05 GMT -5
Maybe they'll finally have a tag elimination chamber match like they have in all the games They should have done that this year with The Shield vs. Cena, Ryback & Sheamus. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 19, 2024 16:22:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2013 17:10:10 GMT -5
I would think they just make the Chamber match itself for the title. I could easily see them going that route with it. yep just like the original chamber match was |
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Dec 11, 2013 17:15:06 GMT -5
The Elimination Chamber will probably be for the title now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kanenite on Dec 11, 2013 17:34:03 GMT -5
It (the EC PPV) honestly should be replaced with No Way Out and then Elimination Chamber matches can be used when it's needed like the old days, and on any PPV again.
|
|
Jamie
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 14, 2013 15:54:23 GMT -5
Posts: 3,380
|
Post by Jamie on Dec 11, 2013 17:38:56 GMT -5
They could have a 3-on-3 tag match but I think they will just g with an Undisputed Championship chamber.
|
|
|
|
Post by McBlake on Dec 11, 2013 17:49:44 GMT -5
It will likely be for the title which will hugely devalue the Royal Rumble imo.
|
|
