becks007
Main Eventer
BELT MARK
Joined on: Aug 14, 2011 9:11:57 GMT -5
Posts: 2,185
|
Post by becks007 on Dec 21, 2013 3:06:49 GMT -5
I like many of the elements of the WWE title, but that f-ing logo is way too big. I love the shape though and I like the ides of the interchangeable side-plate, but I'd love to see the logo just a little smaller and somehow add a globe or eagle or as a nod to the big gold, a crown. The belt is good for publicity. With the logo all big on the main plate, its a marketing tool for the WWE to spread their brand name.
|
|
|
Post by Duck Holliday on Dec 21, 2013 3:28:16 GMT -5
I like many of the elements of the WWE title, but that f-ing logo is way too big. I love the shape though and I like the ides of the interchangeable side-plate, but I'd love to see the logo just a little smaller and somehow add a globe or eagle or as a nod to the big gold, a crown. The belt is good for publicity. With the logo all big on the main plate, its a marketing tool for the WWE to spread their brand name. I understand why it is the way it is. Stylistically/aesthetically it's still just too big. However, I feel like you could shirnk it by 50% (still making it pretty darn big) and throw a cown on top and it would still be great for marketing and be totally visible. Also, during the most popular (and successful) times in WWE history the logo* didn't take up 90% of the faceplate.
|
|
becks007
Main Eventer
BELT MARK
Joined on: Aug 14, 2011 9:11:57 GMT -5
Posts: 2,185
|
Post by becks007 on Dec 21, 2013 10:33:22 GMT -5
The belt is good for publicity. With the logo all big on the main plate, its a marketing tool for the WWE to spread their brand name. I understand why it is the way it is. Stylistically/aesthetically it's still just too big. However, I feel like you could shirnk it by 50% (still making it pretty darn big) and throw a cown on top and it would still be great for marketing and be totally visible. Also, during the most popular (and successful) times in WWE history the logo* didn't take up 90% of the faceplate. That was then. This is now. Clearly, brand recognition is very important to the WWE now. What better way than to have their company logo emblazoned right on the main plate of their top title. Which is why they give out replicas of the belt at events such as the recent Wrestlemania 31 as well as to the winners of the CY Young award...
|
|
|
Post by "The Visionary" Eldniw on Dec 21, 2013 12:31:53 GMT -5
The current one is less than a year old. This. There's no way that they make a new title when the WWE Title belt is 9-10 months old. Those things aren't cheap and they wouldn't have spent all that money to make one if they were gonna change it by the end of the year. Now if they hadn't had Dwayne introduce the new one and theh still have the spinner, then absolutely, I'd say get a new belt for the combined champion.
|
|