|
|
Post by adzy on Apr 11, 2014 17:36:14 GMT -5
Well RVD is back, expected to be for just a few months. So who do you want him to/think he will feud with? Don't expect him near the main event or to hold any titles so i think the options are reasonable.
|
|
|
|
Post by Duck Holliday on Apr 11, 2014 17:38:02 GMT -5
Good question. I am gonna say Barrett.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Richius on Apr 11, 2014 17:39:46 GMT -5
Rather selfishly, I want to select Cesaro just so we can see some awesome matches. But I think Barrett or Fandango are more likely.
|
|
|
|
Post by Danger10 on Apr 11, 2014 17:42:45 GMT -5
Rather selfishly, I want to select Cesaro just so we can see some awesome matches. But I think Barrett or Fandango are more likely. this |
|
|
|
Post by jayrod2009 on Apr 11, 2014 17:44:07 GMT -5
Cesaro for the sheir excitment of seeing a 5 star frog splash countered with a European uppercut!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 27, 2024 13:53:06 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2014 17:46:24 GMT -5
Cesaro all the way. Its a long time since anything WB did interested me.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 27, 2024 13:53:06 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2014 17:48:38 GMT -5
Maybe a title match with Bryan at a filler PPV, that would be really good.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 27, 2024 13:53:06 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2014 18:05:45 GMT -5
Bryan or Cesaro
|
|
|
|
Post by Jonathan Karate on Apr 11, 2014 18:44:57 GMT -5
Barrett and Cesaro.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 27, 2024 13:53:06 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2014 18:56:49 GMT -5
Cesaro.
Off topic anyone else wonder who Sandow pissed off?
|
|
|
|
Post by CMPUNKISGOOD on Apr 11, 2014 19:45:10 GMT -5
I would like to see him go against Cesaro, Rollins, or Ambrose
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Apr 11, 2014 19:55:49 GMT -5
Hopefully Ziggler, Cesaro or Barrett. Or even Miz.
|
|
Alpha Q Up
Main Eventer
Not gravitas
Joined on: Jun 20, 2010 21:48:13 GMT -5
Posts: 2,691
|
Post by Alpha Q Up on Apr 11, 2014 20:40:30 GMT -5
Barrett needs a nice long feud that he can go over with, but so does Cesaro. Either one will suffice imo, but Cesaro is more likely to get the feud.
|
|
|
|
Post by Next Man’s Knowing Rock on Apr 11, 2014 20:47:59 GMT -5
Cesaro and Barrett are the best options. The Heyman/Cesaro thing could lead naturally to a feud with RVD. Wouldn't be surprised if it ended up being Rusev, though. I'd like to see RVD have a good hardcore match with Titus too - I'd have RVD win, but make sure Titus looks good in the match and gets elevated by it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Midnight on Apr 11, 2014 20:52:41 GMT -5
I said Cesaro because i believe that they'd have a great match.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 27, 2024 13:53:06 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2014 7:59:52 GMT -5
Beat big e for the title
|
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Apr 12, 2014 8:08:46 GMT -5
Have Triple H strip Ambrose of the US title (because he doesn't defend it, and it puts more heat on that storyline) and then start up a tournament for the belt.
Over a couple of weeks, RVD then wins the US title in that tournament the whole while building up to that fact that he's older and can't hang with the new generation....so then a title win is actually good for him.
Then he can feud with whatever heels they want for awhile, after that either Barrett (because he wants to prove he's the best "American" around despite being British) or Sandow (because FFS the guy needs something to do) or Titus O'Neil (wasn't he supposed to get a PUSH???) end up taking that title off him during the mid- summer. With a re-match at Summerslam in some kind of gimmick (Ladder match anyone?) where the title holder retains and RVD will be done for another little while.
You create buzz around the US title. You give it legitimacy because a legend is holding it. You give it purpose because multiple guys are fighting for it over a long period of time. And you build to a BIG match at Summerslam this year. And you end up with a mid-card guy being able to break out and DO SOMETHING instead of just wrestling POINTLESS matches or jobbing to whatever face they want to pop the crowd.
|
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Apr 12, 2014 9:16:36 GMT -5
Have Triple H strip Ambrose of the US title (because he doesn't defend it, and it puts more heat on that storyline) and then start up a tournament for the belt. Over a couple of weeks, RVD then wins the US title in that tournament the whole while building up to that fact that he's older and can't hang with the new generation....so then a title win is actually good for him. Then he can feud with whatever heels they want for awhile, after that either Barrett (because he wants to prove he's the best "American" around despite being British) or Sandow (because FFS the guy needs something to do) or Titus O'Neil (wasn't he supposed to get a PUSH???) end up taking that title off him during the mid- summer. With a re-match at Summerslam in some kind of gimmick (Ladder match anyone?) where the title holder retains and RVD will be done for another little while. You create buzz around the US title. You give it legitimacy because a legend is holding it. You give it purpose because multiple guys are fighting for it over a long period of time. And you build to a BIG match at Summerslam this year. And you end up with a mid-card guy being able to break out and DO SOMETHING instead of just wrestling POINTLESS matches or jobbing to whatever face they want to pop the crowd. This. This is what they need to do. |
|
|
|
Post by philly boi on Apr 12, 2014 9:43:21 GMT -5
I don't give a crap. Dude only wants to hang around for 3 months at a time and leave for another 6. He doesn't deserve a noteworthy feud.
|
|
WMDman
Main Eventer
Bad times don't last, but bad guys do.
Joined on: Jan 6, 2013 10:18:05 GMT -5
Posts: 4,469
|
Post by WMDman on Apr 12, 2014 9:59:24 GMT -5
Have Triple H strip Ambrose of the US title (because he doesn't defend it, and it puts more heat on that storyline) and then start up a tournament for the belt. Over a couple of weeks, RVD then wins the US title in that tournament the whole while building up to that fact that he's older and can't hang with the new generation....so then a title win is actually good for him. Then he can feud with whatever heels they want for awhile, after that either Barrett (because he wants to prove he's the best "American" around despite being British) or Sandow (because FFS the guy needs something to do) or Titus O'Neil (wasn't he supposed to get a PUSH???) end up taking that title off him during the mid- summer. With a re-match at Summerslam in some kind of gimmick (Ladder match anyone?) where the title holder retains and RVD will be done for another little while. You create buzz around the US title. You give it legitimacy because a legend is holding it. You give it purpose because multiple guys are fighting for it over a long period of time. And you build to a BIG match at Summerslam this year. And you end up with a mid-card guy being able to break out and DO SOMETHING instead of just wrestling POINTLESS matches or jobbing to whatever face they want to pop the crowd. Preach it, chip |
|
