|
|
Post by Evil Abed on Aug 3, 2014 12:30:08 GMT -5
I just happened to think of this, what if Lesnar beats Cena at Summerslam which is what everyone is expecting, but also worrying bout how they're going to handle Lesnar and his limited dates afterwords. Then I remember a ways back that it was rumored Batista would be returning either in time for Summerslam or immediately after Summerslam since the promotion for GOTG will be over at that point. What if the scenario plays out like this. - Lesnar beats Cena at Summerslam and wins the WWE World Heavyweight Title - Triple H obviously refuses Cena a rematch and we get either Cena/HHH or HHH/Reigns at NOC (since they're trying to get people to re-sign to the network subscription before NOC) - Batista returns on the Raw after Summerslam and faces Lesnar at NOC - Batista beats Lesnar at NOC for the WWE World Championship. Now I realize the amount of hate I am probably about to receive because of the idea of Batista going over Lesnar, however if Lesnar has not signed up for new dates between now and 2015, then Lesnar is most likely not going to have a long reign as champion. If its going to happen I'd rather see them give us one of the last few big name feuds we have yet to see like Lesnar/Batista. We all know Batista will most likely be getting the WWE World Title at some point in the 2 years of his contract and now's a good a time as any with Daniel Bryan injured and Roman Reigns still working his way up to being champion material. My idea is for Batista to hold the title until Rumble, he can defend against the usual list of folks Cena, Orton, Triple H, maybe even Roman Reigns during that time. Then at Rumble he can return the favor to Lesnar giving Lesnar back the title in time for Mania in which he will probably be facing Roman Reigns (again I can feel the hate coming as I write this but being a realist, face it folks this is probably happening) Also it will give us the opportunity to see Lesnar inside the Elimination Chamber with guys like Batista/Orton/Cena/Cesaro?/  . What do you guys think? |
|
Dante, The Voc
Main Eventer
If I'm not online, I'm on the toilet
Joined on: Dec 5, 2010 9:48:02 GMT -5
Posts: 1,374
|
Post by Dante, The Voc on Aug 3, 2014 12:34:21 GMT -5
That would be best-case scenario: big time matchup, Batista gets the reign he wants. The only problem is who's the face? Brock with Heyman can't be cheered after destroying both UT and the golden boy, and I'm damn sure I don't want to see face Batista any time soon. Maybe it could be heel/heel and HHH-Cena would main?
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Aug 3, 2014 12:38:15 GMT -5
That would be best-case scenario: big time matchup, Batista gets the reign he wants. The only problem is who's the face? Brock with Heyman can't be cheered after destroying both UT and the golden boy, and I'm damn sure I don't want to see face Batista any time soon. Maybe it could be heel/heel and HHH-Cena would main? I believe Batista turned face when he quit. |
|
|
|
Post by Evil Abed on Aug 3, 2014 12:38:13 GMT -5
That would be best-case scenario: big time matchup, Batista gets the reign he wants. The only problem is who's the face? Brock with Heyman can't be cheered after destroying both UT and the golden boy, and I'm damn sure I don't want to see face Batista any time soon. Maybe it could be heel/heel and HHH-Cena would main? Obviously we don't want face Batista but I could easily see them trying to force it on us once again. WWE seems to think Batista will still get over with the fans (much like they did earlier this year) and with the whole Batista at odds with the Authority after quitting, it's the easy storyline plot to have him return and be the anti-villain to Triple H and the Authority. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 3, 2024 17:19:05 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2014 13:06:47 GMT -5
No. Whomever beats Lesnar should be a young and upcoming star being as 45 year old Batista wouldn't gain anything by winning the championship from the only person to ever DEFEAT THE UNDERTAKER AT WRESTLEMANIA!
|
|
|
|
Post by Rule 30 on Aug 3, 2014 13:12:42 GMT -5
That would be best-case scenario: big time matchup, Batista gets the reign he wants. The only problem is who's the face? Brock with Heyman can't be cheered after destroying both UT and the golden boy, and I'm damn sure I don't want to see face Batista any time soon. Maybe it could be heel/heel and HHH-Cena would main? The problems with this is that Lesnar is already getting cheered with in his feud with Cena, and Batista is one of the last guys who should go over the man who ended the Streak. At this point, beating the guy who ended the streak is almost as valuable as ending the streak. |
|
|
|
Post by Sleazyness on Aug 3, 2014 13:28:53 GMT -5
Easy solution: Beat down Lesnar, neutralize Dean, and have Seth cash in.
|
|
|
|
Post by Next Man’s Knowing Rock on Aug 3, 2014 13:29:37 GMT -5
Batista vs Lesnar could be a pretty big money match. I think Batista's the guy to get the belt to Reigns at WrestleMania, but I figure that Cena will be a transitional champion between Lesnar and Batista. But Batista vs Brock as a singles match at Night of Champions could be cool.
|
|
|
|
Post by Evil Abed on Aug 3, 2014 13:41:41 GMT -5
That would be best-case scenario: big time matchup, Batista gets the reign he wants. The only problem is who's the face? Brock with Heyman can't be cheered after destroying both UT and the golden boy, and I'm damn sure I don't want to see face Batista any time soon. Maybe it could be heel/heel and HHH-Cena would main? The problems with this is that Lesnar is already getting cheered with in his feud with Cena, and Batista is one of the last guys who should go over the man who ended the Streak. At this point, beating the guy who ended the streak is almost as valuable as ending the streak. The problem I have with the theory of whoever beats Lesnar is just as big as beating the streak is that who would you have defeat Lesnar? I mean no matter who you pick theres going to be an uproar of people on here. You pick Cena/Batista and the internet complains that it should have been an up and coming guy with a big future. If you pick a guy who should have a decent future like Cesaro then you make Lesnar (who's beaten Trips, Punk, Show, and Taker on 4 straight PPVs) look somewhat weak losing to guy who's getting beat by Swagger and Kofi week after week and thus also making the streak pretty look weak to beat. So I don't really think the "Who beats Lesnar is just as big as beating the Streak" argument is valid. Thus why I don't think it matters who beats Lesnar, no one in WWE should look at it that way. If there were two guys who "should" beat Lesnar, its Daniel Bryan (who's probably injured for the rest of the year) or Roman Reigns (who I don't think has enough credibility at this point to beat Lesnar or carry the WWE World Title) That's why again, "if" Lesnar needs time off after NOC, then they need to implement a plan to get the title off of him and having Rollins cash in would make no sense and Rollins is no where near ready to carry the title/main event scene. Giving to Cena for a transitional 16th reign would be stupid as well. Thus why I made the argument to put the title on Batista. He put over the Shield and D-Bry multiple times earlier this year, I think he's deserving of a return investment on some level. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 3, 2024 17:19:05 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2014 14:02:24 GMT -5
Lesnar holds the titles for 21 years, wm 51= Taker vs lesnar for wwe whc, lesnar wins, never ever looses titles, untill sting returns on the night after wrestlemania for a title shot, brock conquers sting, brock conquers everyone, he never looses the titles so hhh needs to make new titles since lesnar is unbeatable, sting wins new titles inna battle royal and must defend against john cena at MITB, lesnar wins MITB briefcase cena wins new titles brock cashes in on cena and wins, brock beats all the other champions too, so brock is WWE,WHC,IC,US,and TAG TEAM champion, as you can see i like brock lesnar
|
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Aug 3, 2014 14:16:44 GMT -5
The only possible outcome for Lesnar vs. Cena at SummerSlam is this....
Cena beats Lesnar to retain the WWE Title.
Then Cena can say "I beat the man who ended the streak, and I did it with all the odds stacked against me."
I know everyone likes to think that Lesnar will win the WWE Title, but I really don't think he will. He only has so many contracted dates with the company, and I really don't think Lesnar cares about being champion, he just wants to keep getting those fat pay checks from Vince McMahon for showing up 20 times a year and wrestling 3 times a year.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Aug 3, 2014 14:23:21 GMT -5
There's going to be an uproar no matter what happens. If Cena retains, the internet will explode. If Lesnar drops it to a guy like Batista, people will say it should've been a young guy. If Lesnar drops it to a young guy, people will say it wasn't the right young guy.
|
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Aug 3, 2014 14:44:15 GMT -5
I would like to see Batista vs Brock. It's definitely a big money match. I would have no problem with Batista winning the titles and holding them until Mania. It makes way more sense than letting Brock hold them hostage. Batista is close enough to that Cena level that he could beat Brock and it would be acceptable. Batista is coming back face after Guardians, absolutely no doubt in my mind about that, and the fans would definitely rally behind him against Brock. Could be great to see.
My ideal scenario is still Seth taking the title from Cena after Cena wins it back, but Batista seems to make more sense big picture if WWE really is committed to mega pushing Roman Reigns.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 3, 2024 17:19:05 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2014 14:52:07 GMT -5
I'd like to see Lesnar hold the belt till Wrestlemania in all honesty.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 3, 2024 17:19:05 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2014 15:36:43 GMT -5
If Lesnar wins the title at Summerslam, he shouldn't hold until wrestlemania if he is going to be part time. Survivor Series at the latest is when he should lose if he is not going to be full time. I read somewhere that Reigns vs Lesnar might be the main event of wrestlemania for the title. I don't think it's a good idea.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 3, 2024 17:19:05 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2014 15:39:54 GMT -5
Batista vs Lesnar should happen at wm 31, but not for a title.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Show on Aug 3, 2014 16:29:33 GMT -5
If his performance as Drax the Destroyer doesnt get Batista massively over as a face, nothing ever will.
|
|
|
|
Post by sitruC on Aug 3, 2014 16:46:00 GMT -5
Or how about this
people stop making complex theories and accept Lesnar holding it until WrestleMania and dropping it to whoever he is against.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 3, 2024 17:19:05 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2014 16:55:12 GMT -5
Not sure the reasoning behind Lesnar not holding the belt long because he's a part timer only for him to drop it to Batista who is also a part timer...
Lesnar should win at Summerslam and be an unstoppable monster who holds the belt hostage until Wrestlemania where he faces Roman Reigns or Daniel Bryan.
|
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Aug 3, 2014 16:59:23 GMT -5
Not sure the reasoning behind Lesnar not holding the belt long because he's a part timer only for him to drop it to Batista who is also a part timer... Lesnar should win at Summerslam and be an unstoppable monster who holds the belt hostage until Wrestlemania where he faces Roman Reigns or Daniel Bryan. How would that work though?? The WWE just stripped Daniel Bryan cause he couldn't defend the Title in 30 days or so, and yet they will be okay with the WWE Champion not defending the belt for 8 months?? It would be cool, but I can't see it happening. Unless the WWE and World Title belts were still separate, but I can't see the WWE not having a WWE World Title defended on a PPV until Wrestlemania. |
|
