Deleted
Joined on: Apr 28, 2024 9:59:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 18, 2014 9:24:22 GMT -5
I swear, some of the stipulations people come up with are very WCW-esque... but not in a good way. Triple S: Wrestling Fan complaining about something on the WWE board and putting another member down!? I'm shocked!
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Sept 18, 2014 9:27:09 GMT -5
I would make a Traditional 5-on-5 Survivor Series Elimination Match featuring NXT Superstars on the Pre-Show just to give them a taste of the spotlight.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Sept 18, 2014 9:29:53 GMT -5
I swear, some of the stipulations people come up with are very WCW-esque... but not in a good way. I wouldn't call this WCW-esque. It's an interesting stipulation that isn't totally dumb/pointless. That would make it WCW/TNA-esque.
|
|
|
Post by Triple S: POOR on Sept 18, 2014 10:13:27 GMT -5
I swear, some of the stipulations people come up with are very WCW-esque... but not in a good way. Triple S: Wrestling Fan complaining about something on the WWE board and putting another member down!? I'm shocked! Yes. I'm giving my opinion, like everyone else. Don't like it? Tough crap. I never "put down" anyone with my comment. I simply stated that idea of the stipulations aren't a good idea (WCW-esque). I didn't say the OP was stupid and should be tarred and feathered for his idea. Calm down.
|
|
|
Post by Triple S: POOR on Sept 18, 2014 10:14:59 GMT -5
I swear, some of the stipulations people come up with are very WCW-esque... but not in a good way. I wouldn't call this WCW-esque. It's an interesting stipulation that isn't totally dumb/pointless. That would make it WCW/TNA-esque. Having a match and the winner(s) immediately competing in another match, either for a championship or a spot on the main roster isn't TNA/WCW-esque? C'mon.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Sept 18, 2014 10:18:41 GMT -5
I wouldn't call this WCW-esque. It's an interesting stipulation that isn't totally dumb/pointless. That would make it WCW/TNA-esque. Having a match and the winner(s) immediately competing in another match, either for a championship or a spot on the main roster isn't TNA/WCW-esque? C'mon. Is it instantly having another match? I missed that part.
|
|
|
Post by Triple S: POOR on Sept 18, 2014 10:22:11 GMT -5
If Team WWE wins, the survivors immediately go into a match with the IC champ for the title e.g. 2 survivors = triple threat with the champ. If Team NXT wins, then the survivors immediately face off against each other and the winner gets a spot on the main roster. If there is a sole survivor then they go straight to the main roster.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Sept 18, 2014 10:25:18 GMT -5
I did miss it. I don't like the idea of it happening instantly, but overall, I do think it's a cool concept. I always consider WCW/TNA-esque stuff to be "Judy Bagwell on a Pole", "Reverse Battle Royals" or things along those lines.
|
|
|
Post by Triple S: POOR on Sept 18, 2014 10:35:44 GMT -5
I did miss it. I don't like the idea of it happening instantly, but overall, I do think it's a cool concept. I always consider WCW/TNA-esque stuff to be "Judy Bagwell on a Pole", "Reverse Battle Royals" or things along those lines. I've always put over-the-top stipulations in the category, too. Such as the captain tag match that I saw at an MLW show YEARS ago.
|
|