Deleted
Joined on: May 13, 2024 15:46:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2014 18:22:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Nov 30, 2014 18:31:35 GMT -5
1. Triple H is not going to "knock the tattoos off of Punk" because Triple H has no reason to. Even if he's mad, he's not going to act physically about it.
2. So, Punk says that he confronted Ryback. Ryback says he didn't. You INSTANTLY believe Ryback over Punk. We can't be certain either way.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brad on Nov 30, 2014 18:32:10 GMT -5
Not surprising but as a huge HUGE Punk fan it is very disheartening.
|
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Nov 30, 2014 18:32:17 GMT -5
Truth hurts, don't it Hunter?
I fully expect them to take many side swipes and indirect shots at Punk on RAW tomorrow night because, really, there's nothing else they can do. Punk opened a can of worms about the company and got the last laugh.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnnyb on Nov 30, 2014 18:36:11 GMT -5
Was this post originally written in crayon? |
|
weaseltv
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 22, 2013 18:57:55 GMT -5
Posts: 3,672
|
Post by weaseltv on Nov 30, 2014 18:36:26 GMT -5
someone's gotta say it.... HHH vs Punk WM31  or better yet HHH and Ryback vs CM Punk and Colt Cabana |
|
|
|
Post by @.@ Hempsterdance @.@ on Nov 30, 2014 18:36:48 GMT -5
aww some baby needs a bottle. Seriously man? I cant take you seriously. You are so one sided its not even funny.  |
|
|
|
Post by Planktung on Nov 30, 2014 18:37:14 GMT -5
Hi, Ryback.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Nov 30, 2014 18:37:51 GMT -5
|
|
Infinite
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 27, 2009 13:49:36 GMT -5
Posts: 2,608
|
Post by Infinite on Nov 30, 2014 18:41:53 GMT -5
Ryback's a lock to take the strap off Lesnar in the Mania main event just to piss Punk off.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 13, 2024 15:46:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2014 18:43:59 GMT -5
Never confronted Ryback?
You must have missed the part in the podcast where Punk goes up to Ryback after he gets thrown to the concrete (completely missing the table) and Punk asks if Ryback did it on purpose or if he's just an idiot.
|
|
|
|
Post by Y3RP: LA MARAVILLA!!! on Nov 30, 2014 18:44:40 GMT -5
ok, so what... if Punk says, what he says. especially about Ryback....if he does use roids. its really whatever....if u knows, u don't juice up....theirs nothing to even say. I would laugh at it....if I knows, its not true.
|
|
|
|
Post by Planktung on Nov 30, 2014 18:44:52 GMT -5
Ryback's a lock to take the strap off Lesnar in the Mania main event just to piss Punk off. Raw the following night would be unreal. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 13, 2024 15:46:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2014 18:46:17 GMT -5
One thing you can be sure of about what Punk said, and it's what he said about Triple H. He's not the only one to say it.
It's actually astounding to me that HHH is STILL pulling that same kind of crap, even during semi-retirement.
|
|
Infinite
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 27, 2009 13:49:36 GMT -5
Posts: 2,608
|
Post by Infinite on Nov 30, 2014 18:50:00 GMT -5
One thing you can be sure of about what Punk said, and it's what he said about Triple H. He's not the only one to say it. It's actually astounding to me that HHH is STILL pulling that same kind of crap, even during semi-retirement. I like Triple H as a performer but I thought this. Its pretty absurd; like what the  does he even stand to gain by crippling the momentum of the hottest guy in 2011? |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 13, 2024 15:46:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2014 18:56:15 GMT -5
One thing you can be sure of about what Punk said, and it's what he said about Triple H. He's not the only one to say it. It's actually astounding to me that HHH is STILL pulling that same kind of crap, even during semi-retirement. I like Triple H as a performer but I thought this. Its pretty absurd; like what the does he even stand to gain by crippling the momentum of the hottest guy in 2011? To some extent I can understand doing it to get on top like he did. But he's held a million titles now, and he's heading into a situation where he'll be running the company eventually. The guy doesn't need to be pulling crap anymore. |
|
|
|
Post by Planktung on Nov 30, 2014 19:04:19 GMT -5
I like Triple H as a performer but I thought this. Its pretty absurd; like what the does he even stand to gain by crippling the momentum of the hottest guy in 2011? To some extent I can understand doing it to get on top like he did. But he's held a million titles now, and he's heading into a situation where he'll be running the company eventually. The guy doesn't need to be pulling crap anymore. It's been that way for nearly five years now, dating back to the angle where Sheamus ended his full-time career. Hunter comes back almost a year later and completely destroys him for no ing reason. Hunter then goes over Punk for no ing reason. He went over Brock at WrestleMania for no ing reason. And up until Punk finally got fed up with the company's sh*t, he was not planning on having a match with Daniel Bryan. There was no ing reason for a Hunter/Bryan match to NOT happen at any point. "No ing reason" is basically how I sum up Triple H. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 13, 2024 15:46:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2014 19:04:19 GMT -5
1. Triple H is not going to "knock the tattoos off of Punk" because Triple H has no reason to. Even if he's mad, he's not going to act physically about it. 2. So, Punk says that he confronted Ryback. Ryback says he didn't. You INSTANTLY believe Ryback over Punk. We can't be certain either way. I do believe ryback over punk. Mainly due to punks actions in the past. But hey, I'm normally wrong about most things. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 13, 2024 15:46:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2014 19:06:25 GMT -5
aww some baby needs a bottle. Seriously man? I cant take you seriously. You are so one sided its not even funny. One sided? All I said was I believe punk should stop acting like he has been. |
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Nov 30, 2014 19:06:35 GMT -5
1. Triple H is not going to "knock the tattoos off of Punk" because Triple H has no reason to. Even if he's mad, he's not going to act physically about it. 2. So, Punk says that he confronted Ryback. Ryback says he didn't. You INSTANTLY believe Ryback over Punk. We can't be certain either way. I do believe ryback over punk. Mainly due to punks actions in the past. But hey, I'm normally wrong about most things. What actions? |
|
