|
|
Post by marino13 on Dec 10, 2014 20:00:49 GMT -5
I like the sounds of Bray vs Taker. I never thought I'd say this, but maybe Bray should go over so Taker could pass the torch on his way out.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Dec 10, 2014 20:04:32 GMT -5
Wow, that would suck.
|
|
charliecore
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Sept 28, 2014 13:59:57 GMT -5
Posts: 181 
|
Post by charliecore on Dec 10, 2014 20:10:27 GMT -5
'Taker having any more mania matches seems anti-climatic to me now that the streak has been broken.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr Angry Cena on Dec 10, 2014 20:14:08 GMT -5
Taker needs to redeem himself after WM30.
|
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Dec 10, 2014 20:31:15 GMT -5
Taker needs to redeem himself after WM30. By going over a nice young talent to build that match that should have happened 15 years ago. Brilliant future planning. |
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Dec 10, 2014 20:35:03 GMT -5
Bray vs Taker at 31 and then Cena vs Taker at 32 maybe?
Or maybe WWE is feeding the sheets to take the attention off of Sting vs Taker until they announce it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr Angry Cena on Dec 10, 2014 21:09:29 GMT -5
Taker needs to redeem himself after WM30. By going over a nice young talent to build that match that should have happened 15 years ago. Brilliant future planning. I didn't say that, you did. |
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Dec 10, 2014 21:11:06 GMT -5
By going over a nice young talent to build that match that should have happened 15 years ago. Brilliant future planning. I didn't say that, you did. You didn't say it exactly but the only way for him to redeem himself from that mess of a match is to win so I connected the dots. |
|
|
|
Post by Mr Angry Cena on Dec 10, 2014 21:17:41 GMT -5
I didn't say that, you did. You didn't say it exactly but the only way for him to redeem himself from that mess of a match is to win so I connected the dots. Good for you! You get a cookie. JK All I meant was he needs to end his in ring career with a great performance. I'm sure Taker is still capable of a great match, depending on his opponent. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 11, 2024 15:10:02 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2014 21:17:56 GMT -5
I really hope not, without The Streak his match, no matter who it's against, will have no reason for being...
|
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Dec 10, 2014 21:24:53 GMT -5
You didn't say it exactly but the only way for him to redeem himself from that mess of a match is to win so I connected the dots. Good for you! You get a cookie. JK All I meant was he needs to end his in ring career with a great performance. I'm sure Taker is still capable of a great match, depending on his opponent. I agree he should end it better than what it was. I only want him to come back if he's actually going to try and help the company and not his buddy though. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 11, 2024 15:10:02 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2014 21:35:10 GMT -5
vince: "you want taker vs sting?! Wyatt vs Taker it is!"
|
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Dec 10, 2014 21:35:51 GMT -5
vince: "you want taker vs sting?! Wyatt vs Taker it is!" Well, Wyatt will be around for more than this one match so...Who needs this match more? |
|
Dante, The Voc
Main Eventer
If I'm not online, I'm on the toilet
Joined on: Dec 5, 2010 9:48:02 GMT -5
Posts: 1,374
|
Post by Dante, The Voc on Dec 10, 2014 21:36:57 GMT -5
Just let the man retire and ride off into the sunset. No more convincing way to hang it up than to lose a Streak lasting a quarter-century.
|
|
|
|
Post by CF9™ on Dec 10, 2014 21:38:24 GMT -5
If they do this, it has to be done WELL. 'Taker needs to be coming back on fire. Pissed, wanting to redeem himself. He should be dominant going into the show. Bray should obviously go over, but 'Taker needs to give him HELL. Both should be exhausted by the end, and Bray would eventually pull out the win. That would get Bray over, and that would be an honorable way of having Undertaker go.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Dec 10, 2014 21:42:19 GMT -5
Good for you! You get a cookie. JK All I meant was he needs to end his in ring career with a great performance. I'm sure Taker is still capable of a great match, depending on his opponent. I agree he should end it better than what it was. I only want him to come back if he's actually going to try and help the company and not his buddy though. He didn't make the decision to lose to Brock, Vince did... |
|
|
|
Post by McBlake on Dec 10, 2014 21:42:50 GMT -5
Undertaker has nothing left. Having him come back and lose again would damage him even more than the winner gains. It would only work against the likes of Sting who also is at the end of his career. But then again, I can't see Sting agreeing to lose possibly his only WWE match.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Dec 10, 2014 21:43:13 GMT -5
vince: "you want taker vs sting?! Wyatt vs Taker it is!" You build more stars if you put Taker and Sting against two different opponents... That being said it really looks like we're getting Sting vs. HHH so that wouldn't be a star-builder either. |
|
cmjeff
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Apr 14, 2014 12:56:28 GMT -5
Posts: 406
|
Post by cmjeff on Dec 10, 2014 21:43:42 GMT -5
that'd be cool, but come on you have to give us Taker vs Sting
|
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Dec 10, 2014 21:45:58 GMT -5
now that the streak is over there is literally zero point to Undertaker wrestling at Wrestlemania
|
|
