|
Post by marino13 on Dec 29, 2014 12:01:02 GMT -5
I don't think it's too late at all for others to benefit from Brock before he leaves. WWE needs to assume Brock won't be there for long and build up the guys that will be. Still have Lesnar win if need be, but showing casual viewers that other talent is not that far below him only benefits WWE and their future. IMO... If Sheamus takes Brock out with a Brogue Kick and only loses cause Heyman puts Brock's foot on the rope, then that improves Sheamus' stature. If Ambrose nails Brock with his DDT, but then Heyman jumps in and get Brock DQ'd that would only build Ambrose up. WWE drastically needs to build their talent up and Brock is legit enough to help them do it. Yeah, but assuming Brock is gone after Mania, he's got two matches left, MAYBE three depending on what they do in February. One of those matches is against Cena. He should have been doing what you're talking about over the last two years, which he did once with Punk, but then I could argue that Punk was as big a draw in that match as Brock by that point. When RR is over, Brock will have had 10 matches in his WWE return, 7 of which came against HHH and Cena. It's been a waste imo. I agree his return run hasn't been all that great or beneficial for WWE. But the topic is about if Brock re-signs, and if he does, I'd use him to build up other people than Cena.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Dec 29, 2014 12:08:08 GMT -5
Yeah, but assuming Brock is gone after Mania, he's got two matches left, MAYBE three depending on what they do in February. One of those matches is against Cena. He should have been doing what you're talking about over the last two years, which he did once with Punk, but then I could argue that Punk was as big a draw in that match as Brock by that point. When RR is over, Brock will have had 10 matches in his WWE return, 7 of which came against HHH and Cena. It's been a waste imo. I agree his return run hasn't been all that great or beneficial for WWE. But the topic is about if Brock re-signs, and if he does, I'd use him to build up other people than Cena. His return would have been better if these things happened. 1) He beats John Cena at Extreme Rules 2012. One of the dumbest booking decisions in all of history 2) He doesn't lose. AT ALL. Triple H and John Cena both didn't need to beat him. If he's undefeated and ends the Streak, could you imagine the impact when he does drop the title? 3) Instead of three lame Triple H matches and four ing John Cena matches, he would be used against younger talent. As you said, he doesn't have to lose to them. Dean Ambrose, Seth Rollins and Daniel Bryan could all do well against him, but in losing efforts. Randy Orton comes very close but loses too. This way, we get some never before seen matches, and people look good. Don't give me this nonsense of "those guys are too small to compete with Brock." His single best match since his return was with CM Punk. A guy who, basing off of looks, should rip Punk in half. It's pro wrestling. It can built to be believable. That's the point of wrestling. To suspend our belief and get us enthralled in what's going on.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Dec 29, 2014 12:41:55 GMT -5
I agree his return run hasn't been all that great or beneficial for WWE. But the topic is about if Brock re-signs, and if he does, I'd use him to build up other people than Cena. His return would have been better if these things happened. 1) He beats John Cena at Extreme Rules 2012. One of the dumbest booking decisions in all of history 2) He doesn't lose. AT ALL. Triple H and John Cena both didn't need to beat him. If he's undefeated and ends the Streak, could you imagine the impact when he does drop the title? 3) Instead of three lame Triple H matches and four ing John Cena matches, he would be used against younger talent. As you said, he doesn't have to lose to them. Dean Ambrose, Seth Rollins and Daniel Bryan could all do well against him, but in losing efforts. Randy Orton comes very close but loses too. This way, we get some never before seen matches, and people look good. Don't give me this nonsense of "those guys are too small to compete with Brock." His single best match since his return was with CM Punk. A guy who, basing off of looks, should rip Punk in half. It's pro wrestling. It can built to be believable. That's the point of wrestling. To suspend our belief and get us enthralled in what's going on. I have to admit at the time I did like Cena defeating Brock at ER12. Only because Brock was unreliable and I thought WWE didn't owed him jack. But I didn't know at the time that they would face each other so many more times. And I didn't mind the first of the Brock/Triple H matches either. Since that was a feud many fans wanted but never got. I was okay with those. But the fact that Brock has only faced 5 different opponents in 2 years is unacceptable. Besides the inevitable Roman dethroning him, nothings been gained. No stars have been made.
|
|
|
Post by HHH316 on Dec 29, 2014 13:37:32 GMT -5
If he re-signed, the only big money match he's got left is with the Rock. He'd need something to hold him over until then. Maybe a summerslam match with Bryan.
But I don't see him re- signing.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 8, 2024 20:01:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2014 14:38:33 GMT -5
No chamber anymore so idk how that works
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 8, 2024 20:01:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2014 14:49:40 GMT -5
Triple threat vs Bob Holly and Tensai
|
|
snickelodeon
Superstar
Joined on: Nov 27, 2011 9:37:08 GMT -5
Posts: 956
|
Post by snickelodeon on Dec 29, 2014 15:01:10 GMT -5
If it was me working for the WWE I would try and persuade them to hold off for a year if Brock was to re sign with WWE say for another year....
Brock beats Cena at Rumble then retains the title at Mania again over possibly Taker again then at Mania 32 - Reigns takes the title from Lesnar, if not Reigns then Bryan or Ziggler.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Dec 29, 2014 15:18:04 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure Brock Lesnar is done with the WWE after this run. Other than facing The Rock at Wrestlemania, there isn't much else he can accomplish.
|
|
|
Post by Yambag Jones on Dec 29, 2014 15:35:56 GMT -5
Honestly, I don't want him back. Being an absentee champ diminishes the title, especially since the big gold belt was absorbed.
Having him on a UFC-like schedule doesn't work if he's only facing Cena and Big Show. If I'm WWE I suck it up and pay Brock to compete at every PPV. Imagine if he had been competing, we could have seen him face Orton, Sheamus, Rollins, Ambrose, or Ziggler.
Instead he'll have ANOTHER match with Cena, and he'll drop the belt to Reigns. Lame.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 8, 2024 20:01:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2014 15:45:57 GMT -5
Geez lots of negativity towards Brock and creative here, lol, guess I can understand it. I just wanted to see other ideas on how to book Brock if he stayed, I know he is gone most likely.
|
|
|
Post by Sizzle on Dec 29, 2014 16:02:50 GMT -5
I don't want him to resign so I will not think about it. I don't like it when wrestlers sign and make rare appearances because I think if you're not gonna show up, then why keep a deal with the company?
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Dec 29, 2014 16:34:41 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 8, 2024 20:01:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2014 17:53:25 GMT -5
If it was me working for the WWE I would try and persuade them to hold off for a year if Brock was to re sign with WWE say for another year.... Brock beats Cena at Rumble then retains the title at Mania again over possibly Taker again then at Mania 32 - Reigns takes the title from Lesnar, if not Reigns then Bryan or Ziggler. Yeah that's not happening
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Dec 29, 2014 18:39:47 GMT -5
wow...WWE should be a bit worried currently.
if Brock leaves I imagine they'd have reigns beat him early, then have cena win the rumble. all of which makes me feel gross.
ambrose, rollins, ziggler and only a few other guys will be the only reasons to watch...
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Dec 29, 2014 18:45:59 GMT -5
wow...WWE should be a bit worried currently. if Brock leaves I imagine they'd have reigns beat him early, then have cena win the rumble. all of which makes me feel gross. ambrose, rollins, ziggler and only a few other guys will be the only reasons to watch... Cena isn't in the Rumble. Did you mean have Cena beat Brock and Reigns win the Rumble?
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Dec 29, 2014 19:22:29 GMT -5
wow...WWE should be a bit worried currently. if Brock leaves I imagine they'd have reigns beat him early, then have cena win the rumble. all of which makes me feel gross. ambrose, rollins, ziggler and only a few other guys will be the only reasons to watch... Cena isn't in the Rumble. Did you mean have Cena beat Brock and Reigns win the Rumble? yep, i accidentally switched reigns' and cena's roles.
|
|