Deleted
Joined on: May 14, 2024 14:49:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2014 0:43:30 GMT -5
With all the rumors of Lesnar going back to UFC we are already seeing plans for Brock dropping the belt before Mania, but what if Brock resigned? What if his contract was not up until 2016? What do you think would happen? How would you book Brock through next year? Would Rollins cash in on Brock?
Personally I would do this...
Brock d. Cena at Rumble
Brock successfully defends in the chamber. Rollins cashes in on Lesnar, but Ambrose interferes costing Rollins the match
Brock d. The Rock at Mania. Cena vs Reigns. Rollins vs Ambrose. Ziggler vs Rusev. HHH/Undertaker vs Sting at Mania
Brock returns at Summerslam to defeat Orton
Brock d. Orton again at Night of Champions
Brock d. Sheamus at Survivor Series
Brock d. Bryan at Rumble '16. Reigns wins rumble. Rollins (who wins MITB for a second year in a row) cashes in successfully on Brock.
Rollins retains inside the Chamber. Ambrose pinned Brock but Rollins get roll up. Ambrose is granted title shot since he pinned Brock
Rollins vs Reigns vs Ambrose for the WWE Title at Mania 32.
Brock helps put over two stars (Rollins and Ambrose)
What do you guys think?
|
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Dec 29, 2014 0:44:57 GMT -5
I would have Seth Rollins be the one to beat Lesnar.
It builds Rollins as a huge star right then and there, and makes Lesnar look like crap because he lost to a guy half his size.
|
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Dec 29, 2014 0:50:18 GMT -5
The same thing that's going to happen now, he's going to lose to Reigns at Mania, then again at whatever PPV he decided to work next. After that, he's going to probably face Big Show again since WWE has no one even in Lesnar's league.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 14, 2024 14:49:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2014 0:52:52 GMT -5
The same thing that's going to happen now, he's going to lose to Reigns at Mania, then again at whatever PPV he decided to work next. After that, he's going to probably face Big Show again since WWE has no one even in Lesnar's league. If WWE is working under the assumption that Brock is gone, you still think Reigns would beat Brock? Even though he is not quite ready? |
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Dec 29, 2014 0:55:36 GMT -5
The same thing that's going to happen now, he's going to lose to Reigns at Mania, then again at whatever PPV he decided to work next. After that, he's going to probably face Big Show again since WWE has no one even in Lesnar's league. If WWE is working under the assumption that Brock is gone, you still think Reigns would beat Brock? Even though he is not quite ready? Yes, WWE have there heart set on pushing Reigns, and they don't care if he's ready, he has a pretty face. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 14, 2024 14:49:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2014 1:03:50 GMT -5
If WWE is working under the assumption that Brock is gone, you still think Reigns would beat Brock? Even though he is not quite ready? Yes, WWE have there heart set on pushing Reigns, and they don't care if he's ready, he has a pretty face. LOL. Sadly you are right. |
|
|
|
Post by IRS on Dec 29, 2014 1:10:29 GMT -5
REIGNSWINSLOL. It's happening no matter what.
|
|
|
|
Post by theMOESIAH on Dec 29, 2014 2:12:22 GMT -5
With all the rumors of Lesnar going back to UFC we are already seeing plans for Brock dropping the belt before Mania, but what if Brock resigned? What if his contract was not up until 2016? What do you think would happen? How would you book Brock through next year? Would Rollins cash in on Brock? Personally I would do this... Brock d. Cena at Rumble Brock successfully defends in the chamber. Rollins cashes in on Lesnar, but Ambrose interferes costing Rollins the match Brock d. The Rock at Mania. Cena vs Reigns. Rollins vs Ambrose. Ziggler vs Rusev. HHH/Undertaker vs Sting at Mania Brock returns at Summerslam to defeat Orton Brock d. Orton again at Night of Champions Brock d. Sheamus at Survivor Series Brock d. Bryan at Rumble '16. Reigns wins rumble. Rollins (who wins MITB for a second year in a row) cashes in successfully on Brock.
Rollins retains inside the Chamber. Ambrose pinned Brock but Rollins get roll up. Ambrose is granted title shot since he pinned Brock Rollins vs Reigns vs Ambrose for the WWE Title at Mania 32. Brock helps put over two stars (Rollins and Ambrose) What do you guys think? You're assuming that the Rock will work WrestleMania and Daniel Bryan will be healthy by January of 2016, those are two pretty big what-if's. |
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Dec 29, 2014 9:19:15 GMT -5
When you said resign, I assumed you meant left or quit, not re-signed. Also, if you think that Brock would be working all of those dates, you're sorely mistaken.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Dec 29, 2014 9:25:58 GMT -5
RE-SIGN.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Dec 29, 2014 9:35:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by sitruC on Dec 29, 2014 9:40:45 GMT -5
He'd give less of a crap then he does now and get paid for 2 years when he only appears twice, then go to UFC and get paid there for 4 fights before he goes to American football and bombs there and returns to WWE.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 14, 2024 14:49:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2014 9:43:31 GMT -5
If Brock re-signed with the WWE I would keep him as champ until I had a Superstar ready to carry the company positioned to defeat him.
|
|
becks007
Main Eventer
BELT MARK
Joined on: Aug 14, 2011 9:11:57 GMT -5
Posts: 2,185
|
Post by becks007 on Dec 29, 2014 10:10:12 GMT -5
I seriously hope he loses it at Royal Rumble. Cena wins it, then Seth cashes in his MITB on Cena. Roman Reigns wins the Royal Rumble event, and it will somehow lead to Seth Rollins vs Roman Reigns at Wrestlemania for the title. As for Brock, he will probably be facing The Undertaker again at Mania...
|
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Dec 29, 2014 10:12:30 GMT -5
I just want Brock to face and put over younger talent. And by "put over" I don't mean lose constantly. I mean make others look strong even if Brock wins.
Have Sheamus, Ambrose, or Ziggler take the Beast to the limit. Make it where they were so close, but a crucial mistake gets Lesnar the win. They went toe to toe with the man to defeat Undertaker. Then when Brock leaves some of WWE's younger talent looks more legit than they do now.
|
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Dec 29, 2014 10:30:28 GMT -5
I just want Brock to face and put over younger talent. And by "put over" I don't mean lose constantly. I mean make others look strong even if Brock wins. Have Sheamus, Ambrose, or Ziggler take the Beast to the limit. Make it where they were so close, but a crucial mistake gets Lesnar the win. They went toe to toe with the man to defeat Undertaker. Then when Brock leaves some of WWE's younger talent looks more legit than they do now. Kind of too late for that now, and even if he stuck around, history shows us they wouldn't do anything but super matches with Brock. The only guy Brock is in position to put over is the next WWE Champion, be it a young guy in Rollins or Reigns, or Cena, who is likely going to get even before Brock does leave. Brock works too few dates to really get value out of him imo, plus it's the law of diminishing returns. We've seen Brock for awhile now, even though he hasn't been around. It's not a big deal to see Brock in a match anymore, especially against Cena who he has faced over-and-over. I think fresh matches with young guys would have been amazing but you always have that casual viewer drawback where they go "that guy won't ever beat Brock!", and they'll be completely right. |
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Dec 29, 2014 10:47:57 GMT -5
I just want Brock to face and put over younger talent. And by "put over" I don't mean lose constantly. I mean make others look strong even if Brock wins. Have Sheamus, Ambrose, or Ziggler take the Beast to the limit. Make it where they were so close, but a crucial mistake gets Lesnar the win. They went toe to toe with the man to defeat Undertaker. Then when Brock leaves some of WWE's younger talent looks more legit than they do now. Kind of too late for that now, and even if he stuck around, history shows us they wouldn't do anything but super matches with Brock. The only guy Brock is in position to put over is the next WWE Champion, be it a young guy in Rollins or Reigns, or Cena, who is likely going to get even before Brock does leave. Brock works too few dates to really get value out of him imo, plus it's the law of diminishing returns. We've seen Brock for awhile now, even though he hasn't been around. It's not a big deal to see Brock in a match anymore, especially against Cena who he has faced over-and-over. I think fresh matches with young guys would have been amazing but you always have that casual viewer drawback where they go "that guy won't ever beat Brock!", and they'll be completely right. I don't think it's too late at all for others to benefit from Brock before he leaves. WWE needs to assume Brock won't be there for long and build up the guys that will be. Still have Lesnar win if need be, but showing casual viewers that other talent is not that far below him only benefits WWE and their future. IMO... If Sheamus takes Brock out with a Brogue Kick and only loses cause Heyman puts Brock's foot on the rope, then that improves Sheamus' stature. If Ambrose nails Brock with his DDT, but then Heyman jumps in and get Brock DQ'd that would only build Ambrose up. WWE drastically needs to build their talent up and Brock is legit enough to help them do it. |
|
|
|
Post by MacReady on Dec 29, 2014 10:50:29 GMT -5
If he re-signed I'd just NOT want him to fight John Cena or Big Show... ever again...
|
|
|
|
Post by The Yes Man on Dec 29, 2014 11:18:05 GMT -5
I'm gonna be pretty pissed if we never get Brock vs Bryan and Orton.
|
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Dec 29, 2014 11:44:02 GMT -5
Kind of too late for that now, and even if he stuck around, history shows us they wouldn't do anything but super matches with Brock. The only guy Brock is in position to put over is the next WWE Champion, be it a young guy in Rollins or Reigns, or Cena, who is likely going to get even before Brock does leave. Brock works too few dates to really get value out of him imo, plus it's the law of diminishing returns. We've seen Brock for awhile now, even though he hasn't been around. It's not a big deal to see Brock in a match anymore, especially against Cena who he has faced over-and-over. I think fresh matches with young guys would have been amazing but you always have that casual viewer drawback where they go "that guy won't ever beat Brock!", and they'll be completely right. I don't think it's too late at all for others to benefit from Brock before he leaves. WWE needs to assume Brock won't be there for long and build up the guys that will be. Still have Lesnar win if need be, but showing casual viewers that other talent is not that far below him only benefits WWE and their future. IMO... If Sheamus takes Brock out with a Brogue Kick and only loses cause Heyman puts Brock's foot on the rope, then that improves Sheamus' stature. If Ambrose nails Brock with his DDT, but then Heyman jumps in and get Brock DQ'd that would only build Ambrose up. WWE drastically needs to build their talent up and Brock is legit enough to help them do it. Yeah, but assuming Brock is gone after Mania, he's got two matches left, MAYBE three depending on what they do in February. One of those matches is against Cena. He should have been doing what you're talking about over the last two years, which he did once with Punk, but then I could argue that Punk was as big a draw in that match as Brock by that point. When RR is over, Brock will have had 10 matches in his WWE return, 7 of which came against HHH and Cena. It's been a waste imo. |
|
