|
|
Post by BØRNS on Jan 18, 2015 22:00:07 GMT -5
Do you think he will wrestle? Has there ever been an uncertainty in wrestling as big as this?
Also, how awesome are these promos?!
|
|
danielbryanwwe
Superstar
BIGGEST D BRY FAN
Joined on: Feb 1, 2014 15:56:07 GMT -5
Posts: 570 
|
Post by danielbryanwwe on Jan 18, 2015 22:21:45 GMT -5
I say he will. And that's an awesome promo!!!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 8, 2024 6:56:59 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2015 22:23:32 GMT -5
There's no point of taker wrestling anymore with the streak over.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 8, 2024 6:56:59 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2015 22:23:47 GMT -5
I have natural gut feeling he will
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 8, 2024 6:56:59 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2015 22:24:14 GMT -5
My gut feeling is I couldn't care less either way.
|
|
johnnyaustin21
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 21, 2011 14:16:20 GMT -5
Posts: 1,609
|
Post by johnnyaustin21 on Jan 18, 2015 22:25:05 GMT -5
As long as he can pass the physical I say yes.He's still under contract and those Wrestlemania payoffs are pretty big I hear,like six figures for the top guys.I see him face Wyatt this year and then next year going into the HOF and facing Sting in a double retirement match at WM 32.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yambag Jones on Jan 18, 2015 22:28:48 GMT -5
Unless it took place before 2014, I'm not interested in seeing any Undertaker matches.
|
|
|
|
Post by Planktung on Jan 18, 2015 22:29:40 GMT -5
He will, but he shouldn't.
|
|
philleaps
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Dec 13, 2012 20:02:02 GMT -5
Posts: 488
|
Post by philleaps on Jan 18, 2015 22:32:42 GMT -5
If he faces Bray Wyatt, who does it really benefit ?
If taker wins so what, the streak it over. If Wyatt wins, the importance of the win isn't as significant.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 8, 2024 6:56:59 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2015 22:32:45 GMT -5
I don't see it happening.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Jan 18, 2015 22:33:42 GMT -5
My gut feeling is I couldn't care less either way. Pretty much this. Regardless of whatever he does at WrestleMania, I will be here not caring one bit. |
|
|
|
Post by Rule 30 on Jan 18, 2015 22:38:09 GMT -5
I say yes, but that's mainly because I'm hoping for a match with Wyatt.
|
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Jan 18, 2015 22:39:07 GMT -5
I think yes. I see them feeding Bray to him honestly.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Jan 18, 2015 22:41:20 GMT -5
my gut says he shouldnt be wrestling at all.
the streak is over, it's pointless.
UNLESS it was going to be an official retirement match. Then I say go for it. But considering they destroyed his legacy by ending the streak, he should at least win his last match ever.
|
|
|
|
Post by BCizzle on Jan 18, 2015 22:42:52 GMT -5
His last match was so bad I don't want to see it. If he wrestling Sting, it could be terrible. Taker really fell off in just one year.
And it sucks that the Streak was ended in such a lame fashion. It was a really unique thing and ending it did more bad than good. The mystique is gone and it certainly didn't elevate Brock Lesnar. I just wish it had all gone done differently.
Could be worse though, it could have been Cena.
|
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jan 18, 2015 22:43:50 GMT -5
He's old and he has a hot wife... so I say stay at home.
|
|
|
|
Post by theMOESIAH on Jan 18, 2015 22:47:47 GMT -5
Like a few other guys have said, without the streak I really don't see any reason for him to wrestle. Every match for the past several years had been based entirety ok the streak (excluding him match with CM Punk). If you take away the reason for bringing him back, then why continue to bring him back?
However I would like to see him wrestle Bray Wyatt, so if he came back for that match I wouldn't be too upset. I also always wanted to see him wrestle John Cena for some reason and I'm not even a Cena fan. Maybe even one more match with the Rock. Basically what I'm saying is, WrestleMania 30 was not the place and Brock Lesnar was not the guy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Flair Forever on Jan 18, 2015 22:48:08 GMT -5
While the streak may be over - there's nothing (nothing at all) stopping Undertaker from adding to his EPIC Win-Loss record..... why not go for 22-1? It's still a legacy that will not be touched for a long, long time....
The internet gets worked up every year that he's not coming..... and then he shows up anyway.
I'd actually love to see him get some kind of retribution on Brock, but I don't see that happening....
Perhaps Undertaker challenges Brock to One-Last-Match? Assuming Brock leave Royal Rumble with no belt.....
|
|
futureisrollins
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Dec 29, 2014 23:02:17 GMT -5
Posts: 239
|
Post by futureisrollins on Jan 18, 2015 22:53:52 GMT -5
Come on guys, yea I know the importance and magic of the streak is gone, but surely that isn't all Taker had going for him. Would it make sense to end his career with the streak? Yea. But if he does continue, I think he deserves more than a shrug or a "He's pointless now." We don't know how he is in the ring right now, we might even be pleasantly surprised, and his legacy alone means that Taker is still someone to look out for. And more importantly, someone we should enjoy for what he is and the big time feeling he brings to the product.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jonathan Karate on Jan 18, 2015 22:57:52 GMT -5
If he faces Bray Wyatt, who does it really benefit ? If taker wins so what, the streak it over. If Wyatt wins, the importance of the win isn't as significant. Its still a rub from one the greatest of all time. Streak or not going over taker can only benefit whomever he faces. |
|
