Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 5:58:10 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2015 15:26:03 GMT -5
Anything that deters future subscribers, while frustrating current subscribers, is bad business. That's just how it works. That not true in the slightest. If that was the case, every business on the planet would be considered as conducting bad business practices. There is no such thing as a business that is able to please EVERYONE. The amount of subscriptions they will deter vs amount that will increase is beneficial to WWE. That's considered smart business when their pros outweigh their cons. To each their own, I could not disagree with you more.
|
|
|
Post by Bartman on Mar 6, 2015 15:31:42 GMT -5
That not true in the slightest. If that was the case, every business on the planet would be considered as conducting bad business practices. There is no such thing as a business that is able to please EVERYONE. The amount of subscriptions they will deter vs amount that will increase is beneficial to WWE. That's considered smart business when their pros outweigh their cons. To each their own, I could not disagree with you more. Fair enough. I think we're just looking at it from two different perspectives. You're viewing it from a consumer standpoint, whereas I'm looking at it from a business perspective and which way has the best chance at increasing overall revenue for WWE.
|
|