|
|
Two belts
Mar 12, 2015 17:32:33 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by The Yes Man on Mar 12, 2015 17:32:33 GMT -5
I see it this way. 1 roster, 1 belt. 2 rosters, 2 belts. Even WITH the brand split, there should only be one major title. The WWE Champion should be the champion of WWE, not just half of it. That's preferable, but if they are gonna have two belts then they should at least have two rosters. |
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Mar 12, 2015 18:16:56 GMT -5
I liked the two titles at the time. But one is more than enough nowadays. Unify the IC & US next.
|
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Mar 12, 2015 18:41:08 GMT -5
Having 2 belts is stupid even during the brand split it was a bad idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheNinthCloud on Mar 12, 2015 18:49:32 GMT -5
If there was a second Main Event title surely Cena/Rusev would feud over it, leaving the US title open for more careless booking.
|
|
|
|
Two belts
Mar 12, 2015 19:19:40 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Kanenite on Mar 12, 2015 19:19:40 GMT -5
If there was a second Main Event title surely Cena/Rusev would feud over it, leaving the US title open for Main Event on the WWE Network and left off the Mania card. Fixed. |
|
becks007
Main Eventer
BELT MARK
Joined on: Aug 14, 2011 9:11:57 GMT -5
Posts: 2,185
|
Post by becks007 on Mar 12, 2015 19:38:44 GMT -5
This whole thing with two main titles started ever since WWE acquired WCW. It has always been one main title before that. So yeah. i like it the way it is now, one main title to represent the champion of the company, just like before. And like someone here mentioned, its pretty stupid to have two main titles within the same company.
|
|
|
|
Post by cripplercrossface on Mar 12, 2015 20:25:45 GMT -5
If WWE does another brand split, then yes two World belts should be the norm for them again. As of now if they continue to stay a single company with all superstars on both Raw and Smackdown, one World belt is good enough.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 6, 2024 2:35:02 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Two belts
Mar 12, 2015 20:54:28 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2015 20:54:28 GMT -5
Just one, thanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by kazoosandstreamers on Mar 12, 2015 22:14:37 GMT -5
I like one better.
IC and US titles shine more then. Well..when they want them to shine.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prophet of Ash on Mar 12, 2015 22:20:08 GMT -5
People begged for a single championship and now people are wanting two back. Don't quite understand that. *shrug* because everyone on the internet are actually one person... |
|
|
|
Post by Hendrix83 on Mar 12, 2015 22:26:46 GMT -5
"It gave more superstars a chance to win a belt."
That's the problem with 2 belts. A World Championship is difficult to attain, which makes it more important.
When there was a WHC it was effectively what the Intercontinental title used to be. Very important, just not the top guy in the company.
I think the real issue is - with a guy like Brock Lesnar holding the strap it feels less like there is a World Championship at all. Still, it's good for the title.
|
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Mar 12, 2015 22:36:27 GMT -5
People begged for a single championship and now people are wanting two back. Don't quite understand that. *shrug* because everyone on the internet are actually one person...  |
|
|
|
Two belts
Mar 12, 2015 22:40:40 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Duck Holliday on Mar 12, 2015 22:40:40 GMT -5
There should only be one world title to me.
|
|
|
|
Two belts
Mar 13, 2015 1:07:53 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by A-Rob on Mar 13, 2015 1:07:53 GMT -5
No
|
|
|
|
Post by RKOrton #ThankYouLesnar on Mar 13, 2015 1:12:04 GMT -5
Its not just a no its a ..Hell NO!
|
|
Falconsinclair
Superstar
Joined on: Jun 24, 2012 9:16:24 GMT -5
Posts: 803 
|
Post by Falconsinclair on Mar 13, 2015 2:54:43 GMT -5
No, there shouldn't be two world champions in one company
With that said if the Brand Extension ever does come back there should be a single WWW World Heavyweight Champion. The IC Belt should become exclusive to Raw and the U.S. Title exclusive to Smackdown. You could also create "Raw" & "Smackdown" Championships where those champions could use being the "Brand Champion" as a way to elevate themselves to WWE World Heavyweight Championship status. ie: If Raw or Smackdown was given exclusive PPV's again, the at the Raw only PPV the Raw Champion could challenge for the WWE belt and the same for Smackdown
|
|
|
|
Two belts
Mar 13, 2015 3:19:38 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Jonathan Karate on Mar 13, 2015 3:19:38 GMT -5
Absolutely not.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 6, 2024 2:35:02 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2015 3:52:00 GMT -5
When the strap isn't on someone like Brock who isn't contractually obligated to a specific amount of shows with specific dates, the Heavyweight Championship will seem more prestigious. Also doesn't help that their mid-card is a mess right now and what's left of their upper card is working their own thing right now for WrestleMania. At least we're getting Roman forced down our throats as a contender.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 6, 2024 2:35:02 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2015 10:11:26 GMT -5
No.
I hated the idea of having 2 world titles. I thought it sucked.
Also, they have 2 midcard titles and can't get their stuff together enough to even make those mean something.
|
|
jcjdotcom
Superstar
Joined on: Oct 23, 2005 23:26:04 GMT -5
Posts: 530
|
Post by jcjdotcom on Mar 13, 2015 14:55:48 GMT -5
I like lots of titles. I'd bring back the Euro and maybe the cruiserweight and hardcore titles as well. I'd also consider a women's tag team championship.
The one thing I do like about one title is that the US and Intercontinental titles have become desirable/important again.
|
|
